IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i20p6776-d658517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Efficiency in the Industry 4.0 Era: Attributes of Teal Organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Radosław Miśkiewicz

    (Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, 70-453 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Rzepka

    (Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Ryszard Borowiecki

    (WSB University in Dąbrowa Górnicza, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland)

  • Zbigniew Olesińki

    (Faculty of Business and International Relations, Vistula University, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The rapid development of innovations in the industry 4.0 era led to new or evolved companies. At the same time, the accepted concept of carbon-free development requires building a new philosophy for the company’s management. The paper aims to analyse the key attributes of teal organisations (as a new type of a company) from the energy sector (as a core sector for carbon-free transformation). The paper summarises the core features of teal organisations and their attributes. In the paper, three hypotheses are tested: innovations and technologies are the most used attributes among teal organisations from the energy sector; organisational and corporate culture are the least used attributes among teal organisations from the energy sector; in the energy sector, the companies that have the attributes of teal organisations primarily work in countries with a high level of innovation and information technologies (as a core indicator of Industry 4.0) and economic development. For testing the hypotheses, the following methods are applied: a Friedman test, a paired-samples t -test, the principal components analysis, a correlation analysis, an ANOVA test (analysis of variance), and a regression analysis. The online survey generates the data for analysis. The object of the research is the workers from the energy sector companies from five countries (Poland, Ukraine, Georgia, Slovakia, and Romania). The findings of the statistical analysis confirm the first and second hypotheses. Companies in the energy sector mostly use innovations and technologies as the attributes of teal organisations. The regression analysis results show that an increase of 1% of patent applications leads to an increased energy efficiency of 1.29%. Additionally, the implemented features of teal organisations in the energy sector allow for improving the country’s energy efficiency, which, as a consequence, then boosts carbon-free development.

Suggested Citation

  • Radosław Miśkiewicz & Agnieszka Rzepka & Ryszard Borowiecki & Zbigniew Olesińki, 2021. "Energy Efficiency in the Industry 4.0 Era: Attributes of Teal Organisations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6776-:d:658517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piotr F. Borowski, 2021. "Digitization, Digital Twins, Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Chen, Maozhi & Sinha, Avik & Hu, Kexiang & Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim, 2021. "Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: Moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Azam, Muhammad & Khan, Abdul Qayyum, 2016. "Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 556-567.
    4. Fombrun, Charles J. & Wally, Stefan, 1989. "Structuring small firms for rapid growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 107-122, March.
    5. Apergis, Nicholas & Payne, James E., 2010. "Coal consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1353-1359, March.
    6. Pan, Xiongfeng & Uddin, Md. Kamal & Han, Cuicui & Pan, Xianyou, 2019. "Dynamics of financial development, trade openness, technological innovation and energy intensity: Evidence from Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 456-464.
    7. Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Aleksy Kwilinski & Henryk Dzwigol & Mariola Dzwigol-Barosz & Vladyslav Pavlyk & Piotr Barosz, 2021. "The Impact of the Government Policy on the Energy Efficient Gap: The Evidence from Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Chygryn Olena & Lyulyov Oleksii & Pimonenko Tetyana & Mlaabdal Saad, 2020. "Efficiency of oil-production: the role of institutional factors," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 92-104, December.
    9. Niebel, Thomas, 2018. "ICT and economic growth – Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 197-211.
    10. Ana Moreno Romero & Ángel Uruburu & Ajay K. Jain & Manuel Acevedo Ruiz & Carlos F. Gómez Muñoz, 2020. "The Path towards Evolutionary—Teal Organizations: A Relationship Trigger on Collaborative Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Al-mulali, Usama & Fereidouni, Hassan Gholipour & Lee, Janice Ym & Sab, Che Normee Binti Che, 2013. "Examining the bi-directional long run relationship between renewable energy consumption and GDP growth," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 209-222.
    12. Apergis, Nicholas & Payne, James E., 2010. "Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 656-660, January.
    13. Dehghan Shabani, Zahra & Shahnazi, Rouhollah, 2019. "Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: A panel causality analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1064-1078.
    14. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Raghutla, Chandrashekar & Song, Malin & Zameer, Hashim & Jiao, Zhilun, 2020. "Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: The role of technological innovations in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Radosław Wolniak & Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Identification of Energy Efficiency Trends in the Context of the Development of Industry 4.0 Using the Polish Steel Sector as an Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Meeus, Marius T. H. & Oerlemans, Leon A. G., 2000. "Firm behaviour and innovative performance: An empirical exploration of the selection-adaptation debate," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 41-58, January.
    17. Maldonado, Tiffany & Vera, Dusya & Ramos, Nichelle, 2018. "How humble is your company culture? And, why does it matter?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 745-753.
    18. Ainur O. Ongdash & Amalbek D. Omirtay & Manshuk T. Bayetova & Ernur Ongdashuly, 2020. "Economic Growth Modeling for the Republic of Kazakhstan Based on the Higher Energy Efficiency Level," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 396-403.
    19. Oleksii Lyulyov & Ihor Vakulenko & Tetyana Pimonenko & Aleksy Kwilinski & Henryk Dzwigol & Mariola Dzwigol-Barosz, 2021. "Comprehensive Assessment of Smart Grids: Is There a Universal Approach?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    20. František Simetinger & Zuopeng (Justin) Zhang, 2020. "Deriving secondary traits of industry 4.0: A comparative analysis of significant maturity models," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 663-678, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward Owusu & Jones Lewis Arthur & Kwaku Amofah, 2023. "Cross-Сultural Communication Strategies in the Digital Era: A Bibliometric Analysis," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 6(2), pages 55-71, June.
    2. Radoslaw Miskiewicz, 2022. "Clean and Affordable Energy within Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Governance Digitalization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Yana Us & Tetyana Pimonenko & Oleksii Lyulyov, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Renewable Energy Development for the Green Brand within SDGs: A Meta-Analytic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Henryk Dzwigol & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Regulations, Renewable Energy, and Energy Efficiency in Finding the Path to Green Economic Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Adam Sulich & Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc, 2022. "Changes in Energy Sector Strategies: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Melike E. Bildirici & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Fazıl Kayıkçı & Sema Yılmaz Genç, 2022. "ICT, Energy Intensity, and CO 2 Emission Nexus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Lahouel, Béchir & Taleb, Lotfi & Ben Zaied, Younes & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Does ICT change the relationship between total factor productivity and CO2 emissions? Evidence based on a nonlinear model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Yuriy Bilan & Dalia Streimikiene & Tetyana Vasylieva & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Anatolii Pavlyk, 2019. "Linking between Renewable Energy, CO 2 Emissions, and Economic Growth: Challenges for Candidates and Potential Candidates for the EU Membership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Zafar, Muhammad Wasif & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hou, Fujun & Sinha, Avik, 2018. "¬¬¬¬¬¬From Nonrenewable to Renewable Energy and Its Impact on Economic Growth: Silver Line of Research & Development Expenditures in APEC Countries," MPRA Paper 90611, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Dec 2018.
    4. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Does Renewable Energy Drive Sustainable Economic Growth? Multivariate Panel Data Evidence for EU-28 Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Aslan, Alper, 2016. "The causal relationship between biomass energy use and economic growth in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 362-366.
    6. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Mo, Fei & Wang, Derek D., 2022. "Sustainable development of countries all over the world and the impact of renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 320-331.
    7. Ben Jebli, Mehdi & Ben Youssef, Slim, 2015. "Output, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and international trade: Evidence from a panel of 69 countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 799-808.
    8. Sebri, Maamar, 2015. "Use renewables to be cleaner: Meta-analysis of the renewable energy consumption–economic growth nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 657-665.
    9. Ozcan, Burcu & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2019. "Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in emerging countries: A bootstrap panel causality test," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 30-37.
    10. Koçak, Emrah & Şarkgüneşi, Aykut, 2017. "The renewable energy and economic growth nexus in Black Sea and Balkan countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 51-57.
    11. Abdullah Emre ÇAĞLAR & Çiğdem DEMİR, 2018. "Yenilenebilir Kaynaklı Enerji Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Avrupa Birliğine Ait Yeni Bulgular," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 14(28), pages 9-30, December.
    12. Seong-Hoon Lee & Yonghun Jung, 2018. "Causal dynamics between renewable energy consumption and economic growth in South Korea: Empirical analysis and policy implications," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(7), pages 1298-1315, November.
    13. Naveed Razzaq & Faqeer Muhammad & Rehmat Karim & Muhammad Tariq & Khair Muhammad, 2021. "The Nexus between Energy, Environment and Growth: Evidence from Latin-American Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 82-87.
    14. Yeboah Asuamah, Samuel, 2015. "Government activities and fossil fuel consumption in Ghana," MPRA Paper 89549, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Aug 2018.
    15. Jin, Taeyoung & Kim, Jinsoo, 2018. "What is better for mitigating carbon emissions – Renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 464-471.
    16. Fangming Xie & Chuanzhe Liu & Huiying Chen & Ning Wang, 2018. "Threshold Effects of New Energy Consumption Transformation on Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Abbas Rizvi, Syed Kumail & Dong, Kangyin & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Fiscal decentralization as new determinant of renewable energy demand in China: The role of income inequality and urbanization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 68-80.
    18. Caraiani, Chirața & Lungu, Camelia I. & Dascălu, Cornelia, 2015. "Energy consumption and GDP causality: A three-step analysis for emerging European countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 198-210.
    19. Su, Chi-Wei & Pang, Li-Dong & Tao, Ran & Shao, Xuefeng & Umar, Muhammad, 2022. "Renewable energy and technological innovation: Which one is the winner in promoting net-zero emissions?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Lin, Boqiang & Moubarak, Mohamed, 2014. "Renewable energy consumption – Economic growth nexus for China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 111-117.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6776-:d:658517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.