IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i15p4464-d600318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Moein Shamoushaki

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Mehdi Aliehyaei

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pardis Branch, Islamic Azad University, Pardis New City 1468995513, Iran)

  • Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary

    (Social Science Research Institute, Tokai University, 4-1-1 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka-shi 259-1292, Japan)

Abstract

This research presents the energy, exergy, economic, and environmental assessment, and multi-objective optimization of a flash-binary geothermal CCHP cycle. A sensitivity analysis of production well inlet temperature and cooling to power flow ratio on exergetic, economic, and environmental parameters was conducted. Furthermore, the effects of the inflation rate and plant working hours on economic parameters were investigated. Results showed that increasing the production well inlet temperature harms exergy efficiency and exergetic performance criteria and results in a gain in exergo-environmental impact index and heating capacity. In addition, the total plant cost increased by raising the production well temperature. Furthermore, increasing the cooling to power flow ratio caused a reduction in exergy efficiency, exergetic performance criteria, and produced net power and an enhancement in exergy destruction, cooling capacity, and total plant cost. The exergy efficiency and total cost rate in the base case were 58% and 0.1764, respectively. Optimization results showed that at the selected optimum point, exergy efficiency was 4.5% higher, and the total cost rate was 10.3% lower than the base case. Levelized cost of energy and the pay-back period at the optimum point was obtained as 6.22 c$/kWh, 3.43 years, which were 5.14% and 6.7% lower than the base case.

Suggested Citation

  • Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4464-:d:600318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    2. Leveni, Martina & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Cozzolino, Raffaello & Mendecka, Barbara, 2019. "Energy and exergy analysis of cold and power production from the geothermal reservoir of Torre Alfina," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 807-818.
    3. Parikhani, Towhid & Azariyan, Hossein & Behrad, Reza & Ghaebi, Hadi & Jannatkhah, Javad, 2020. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a novel ammonia-water mixture combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1158-1175.
    4. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    5. Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farideh Atabi & Mohammad Khorshidvand & Marc A. Rosen, 2015. "Exergy, Economic and Environmental Analysis for Simple and Combined Heat and Power IC Engines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Parikhani, Towhid & Ghaebi, Hadi & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2018. "A novel geothermal combined cooling and power cycle based on the absorption power cycle: Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 265-277.
    7. Mamdouh El Haj Assad & Yashar Aryanfar & Salar Radman & Bashria Yousef & Mohammadreza Pakatchian, 2021. "Energy and exergy analyses of single flash geothermal power plant at optimum separator temperature," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 873-881.
    8. Kamyar Darvish & Mehdi A. Ehyaei & Farideh Atabi & Marc A. Rosen, 2015. "Selection of Optimum Working Fluid for Organic Rankine Cycles by Exergy and Exergy-Economic Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    10. Chaiyat, Nattaporn & Kiatsiriroat, Tanongkiat, 2015. "Analysis of combined cooling heating and power generation from organic Rankine cycle and absorption system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 363-370.
    11. Gholizadeh, Towhid & Vajdi, Mohammad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2020. "A new trigeneration system for power, cooling, and freshwater production driven by a flash-binary geothermal heat source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 31-43.
    12. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    13. Shamoushaki, Moein & Ehyaei, M.A. & Ghanatir, Farrokh, 2017. "Exergy, economic and environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a SOFC-GT power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 515-531.
    14. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Magiri-Skouloudi, Despina & Grimekis, Dimitrios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Εnergy-exergy analysis of ultra-supercritical biomass-fuelled steam power plants for industrial CHP, district heating and cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 252-269.
    15. Cao, Yan & Mihardjo, Leonardus WW. & Dahari, Mahidzal & Ghaebi, Hadi & Parikhani, Towhid & Mohamed, Abdeliazim Mustafa, 2021. "An innovative double-flash binary cogeneration cooling and power (CCP) system: Thermodynamic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    16. Imran, Muhammad & Usman, Muhammad & Park, Byung-Sik & Yang, Youngmin, 2016. "Comparative assessment of Organic Rankine Cycle integration for low temperature geothermal heat source applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 473-490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Athanasios G. Vallis & Theodoros C. Zannis & Evangelos V. Hristoforou & Elias A. Yfantis & Efthimios G. Pariotis & Dimitrios T. Hountalas & John S. Katsanis, 2022. "Design of Container Ship Main Engine Waste Heat Recovery Supercritical CO 2 Cycles, Optimum Cycle Selection through Thermo-Economic Optimization with Genetic Algorithm and Its Exergo-Economic and Exer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Jinke Tao & Huitao Wang & Jianjun Wang & Chaojun Feng, 2022. "Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Analysis of a Novel Power and Cooling Cogeneration System Based on Organic Rankine Cycle and Ejector Refrigeration Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Caliskan, Hakan & Açıkkalp, Emin & Rostamnejad Takleh, H. & Zare, V., 2023. "Advanced, extended and combined extended-advanced exergy analyses of a novel geothermal powered combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 125-134.
    4. Zhang, Mingming & Timoshin, Anton & Al-Ammar, Essam A. & Sillanpaa, Mika & Zhang, Guiju, 2023. "Power, cooling, freshwater, and hydrogen production system from a new integrated system working with the zeotropic mixture, using a flash-binary geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    5. Shamoushaki, Moein & Fiaschi, Daniele & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Talluri, Lorenzo, 2022. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analyses of a geothermal power plant with NCGs reinjection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shamoushaki, Moein & Fiaschi, Daniele & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Talluri, Lorenzo, 2022. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analyses of a geothermal power plant with NCGs reinjection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    2. Moein Shamoushaki & Giampaolo Manfrida & Lorenzo Talluri & Pouriya H. Niknam & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Different Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations Cost Estimation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Zhang, Feng & Lei, Fang & Liao, Gaoliang & Jiaqiang, E., 2022. "Performance assessment and optimization on a novel geothermal combined cooling and power system integrating an absorption power cycle with an absorption-compression hybrid refrigeration cycle in paral," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 1061-1075.
    4. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    5. Mahmoudan, Alireza & Samadof, Parviz & Hosseinzadeh, Siamak & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2021. "A multigeneration cascade system using ground-source energy with cold recovery: 3E analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Vaclav Novotny & David J. Szucs & Jan Špale & Hung-Yin Tsai & Michal Kolovratnik, 2021. "Absorption Power and Cooling Combined Cycle with an Aqueous Salt Solution as a Working Fluid and a Technically Feasible Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    7. M. Ehyaei & M. Kasaeian & Stéphane Abanades & Armin Razmjoo & Hamed Afshari & Marc Rosen & Biplab Das, 2023. "Natural gas‐fueled multigeneration for reducing environmental effects of brine and increasing product diversity: Thermodynamic and economic analyses," Post-Print hal-04113893, HAL.
    8. Kazemiani-Najafabadi, Parisa & Amiri Rad, Ehsan & Simonson, Carey James, 2022. "Designing and thermodynamic optimization of a novel combined absorption cooling and power cycle based on a water-ammonia mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    9. Yang, Fubin & Cho, Heejin & Zhang, Hongguang & Zhang, Jian, 2017. "Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1100-1118.
    10. Hashemian, Nasim & Noorpoor, Alireza, 2022. "A geothermal-biomass powered multi-generation plant with freshwater and hydrogen generation options: Thermo-economic-environmental appraisals and multi-criteria optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 254-266.
    11. Yosaf, Salem & Ozcan, Hasan, 2018. "Exergoeconomic investigation of flue gas driven ejector absorption power system integrated with PEM electrolyser for hydrogen generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 88-99.
    12. Kazemi, Shabnam & Nor, Mohamad Iskandr Mohamad & Teoh, Wen Hui, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an ionic liquid as a new proposed geothermal fluid in different organic Rankine cycles for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Jiansheng, Wang & Lide, Su & Qiang, Zhu & Jintao, Niu, 2022. "Numerical investigation on power generation performance of enhanced geothermal system with horizontal well," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    14. Fan, Guangli & Ahmadi, A. & Ehyaei, M.A. & Das, Biplab, 2021. "Energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental analyses of polygeneration system integrated gas cycle, absorption chiller, and Copper-Chlorine thermochemical cycle to produce power, cooling, and hyd," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Hai, Tao & Ashraf Ali, Masood & Alizadeh, As'ad & Sharma, Aman & Sayed Mohammed Metwally, Ahmed & Ullah, Mirzat & Tavasoli, Masoumeh, 2023. "Enhancing the performance of a Novel multigeneration system with electricity, heating, cooling, and freshwater products using genetic algorithm optimization and analysis of energy, exergy, and entrans," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 184-205.
    16. Abdolalipouradl, Mehran & Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Khalilarya, Shahram, 2020. "A comparative analysis of novel combined flash-binary cycles for Sabalan geothermal wells: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    17. Tariq, Shahzeb & Safder, Usman & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "Exergy-based weighted optimization and smart decision-making for renewable energy systems considering economics, reliability, risk, and environmental assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari, 2017. "Energy, economic and environmental (3E) aspects of internal heat exchanger for ORC geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1096-1106.
    19. Altun, A.F. & Kilic, M., 2020. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of a geothermal ORC power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 261-274.
    20. Moein Shamoushaki & Pouriya H. Niknam & Lorenzo Talluri & Giampaolo Manfrida & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Development of Cost Correlations for the Economic Assessment of Power Plant Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:15:p:4464-:d:600318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.