IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v317y2025ics0360544225002750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive 4E (energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental) analysis and optimization of wastewater sludge gasification: A case study in a resource-constrained area

Author

Listed:
  • Bayat, Delaram
  • Sharifian, Mohammad
  • Khajehpour, Hossein

Abstract

Global population growth has driven increased energy demand and waste generation, particularly in industrial sectors. This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of wastewater sludge gasification (WSG) as a waste-to-energy solution for resource-constrained areas. Comprehensive energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental (4E) analyses were conducted to assess and optimize the WSG process, identifying inefficiencies, costs, and environmental impacts. Sensitivity analyses of key gasification parameters further refined performance, economic viability, and environmental outcomes. In a case study in Kerman, Iranan, the results reveal an overall exergy efficiency of 22.61 %, limited by inefficiencies in the boiler and gasification components, with exergy destruction rates of 47.4 %, 22 %, and 20.9 %, respectively. Optimization of these components is recommended to enhance system efficiency. The study also demonstrates WSG's lower carbon footprint compared to conventional sludge treatment methods (incineration and landfill) and highlights its potential for cost reduction in industrial symbiosis scenarios. Moreover, syngas production was optimized to achieve an ideal hydrogen-to-carbon monoxide ratio for direct reduction iron production, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional steam methane reforming. The findings suggest that integrating WSG with steel production not only addresses local resource constraints but also provides a scalable, cost-effective approach to syngas generation, advancing industrial energy efficiency and waste management in similar regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayat, Delaram & Sharifian, Mohammad & Khajehpour, Hossein, 2025. "Comprehensive 4E (energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental) analysis and optimization of wastewater sludge gasification: A case study in a resource-constrained area," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225002750
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225002750
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Fu, Qizi & Wang, Dongbo & Li, Xiaoming & Yang, Qi & Xu, Qiuxiang & Ni, Bing-Jie & Wang, Qilin & Liu, Xuran, 2021. "Towards hydrogen production from waste activated sludge: Principles, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Schakel, Wouter & Hung, Christine Roxanne & Tokheim, Lars-Andre & Strømman, Anders Hammer & Worrell, Ernst & Ramírez, Andrea, 2018. "Impact of fuel selection on the environmental performance of post-combustion calcium looping applied to a cement plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 75-87.
    4. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Soltanian, Salman & Ghanavati, Hossein, 2019. "Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 64-76.
    5. Meyer, Lutz & Tsatsaronis, George & Buchgeister, Jens & Schebek, Liselotte, 2009. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 75-89.
    6. Chen, Yunan & Yi, Lei & Wei, Wenwen & Jin, Hui & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Hydrogen production by sewage sludge gasification in supercritical water with high heating rate batch reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    7. Nipattummakul, Nimit & Ahmed, Islam & Kerdsuwan, Somrat & Gupta, Ashwani K., 2010. "High temperature steam gasification of wastewater sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3729-3734, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rocha, Danilo H.D. & Siqueira, Diana S. & Silva, Rogério J., 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluating coal-fired power plants technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Carvalho, Monica & B. Azevedo, Jonathan L., 2019. "Exergoenvironmental results of a eucalyptus biomass-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Marques, Adriano S. & Carvalho, Monica & Ochoa, Alvaro A.V. & Abrahão, Raphael & Santos, Carlos A.C., 2021. "Life cycle assessment and comparative exergoenvironmental evaluation of a micro-trigeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Balli, Ozgur & Kale, Utku & Rohács, Dániel & Hikmet Karakoc, T., 2022. "Environmental damage cost and exergoenvironmental evaluations of piston prop aviation engines for the landing and take-off flight phases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    5. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Khounani, Zahra & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Amiri, Hamid & Lam, Su Shiung & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2021. "Exergoenvironmental analysis of bioenergy systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Eduardo J. C. Cavalcanti & João Victor M. Ferreira & Monica Carvalho, 2021. "Research on a Solar Hybrid Trigeneration System Based on Exergy and Exergoenvironmental Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Cheng, Yoke Wang & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Peng, Wanxi & Park, Young-Kwon & Sonne, Christian & Kong, Sieng Huat & Tabatabaei, 2021. "Progress in the torrefaction technology for upgrading oil palm wastes to energy-dense biochar: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Amro Hassanein & Freddy Witarsa & Stephanie Lansing & Ling Qiu & Yong Liang, 2020. "Bio-Electrochemical Enhancement of Hydrogen and Methane Production in a Combined Anaerobic Digester (AD) and Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC) from Dairy Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    10. Gürbüz, Emine Yağız & Güler, Onur Vahip & Keçebaş, Ali, 2022. "Environmental impact assessment of a real geothermal driven power plant with two-stage ORC using enhanced exergo-environmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1110-1123.
    11. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2011. "Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5886-5898.
    12. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ansarinasab, Hojat & Mousavi, Seyed Ali, 2021. "Life cycle assessment and exergoeconomic analysis of the multi-generation system based on fuel cell for methanol, power, and heat production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1314-1332.
    13. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    15. Marco F. Torchio, 2013. "Energy-Exergy, Environmental and Economic Criteria in Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Plants: Indexes for the Evaluation of the Cogeneration Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Mehrabian, M.J. & Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H., 2023. "4E, risk, diagnosis, and availability evaluation for optimal design of a novel biomass-solar-wind driven polygeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    17. Zhang, Huan & Liu, Tao & Liu, Wang & Zhou, Jianzhao & Zhang, Quanguo & Ren, Jingzheng, 2025. "An interpretable deep learning framework for photofermentation biological hydrogen production and process optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    18. Andrea Aquino & Pietro Poesio, 2021. "Off-Design Exergy Analysis of Convective Drying Using a Two-Phase Multispecies Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-36, January.
    19. Ibrahim Yildiz & Hakan Caliskan & Kazutoshi Mori, 2020. "Exergy analysis and nanoparticle assessment of cooking oil biodiesel and standard diesel fueled internal combustion engine," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(8), pages 1303-1317, December.
    20. Yıldız Koç, 2019. "Parametric Optimisation of an ORC in a Wood Chipboard Production Facility to Recover Waste Heat Produced from the Drying and Steam Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225002750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.