IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v163y2018icp88-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergoeconomic investigation of flue gas driven ejector absorption power system integrated with PEM electrolyser for hydrogen generation

Author

Listed:
  • Yosaf, Salem
  • Ozcan, Hasan

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the thermodynamic and economic aspects of a low temperature flue gas driven advanced absorption power cycle (AAPC) integrated to PEM electrolyser (PEME) for hydrogen and oxygen production. Flue gases from a small-scale coal fired power plant are utilized to energize the generator of the AAPC system. Produced power drives the PEME for primarily hydrogen generation, and oxygen as a byproduct. Use of ejector enhances the power production in the turbine favoring plant performance. The present integrated system produces daily amounts of ∼1.15 kg H2 and ∼4.59 kg O2 at 140 °C maximum cycle temperature with a capacity factor of 85%, 30 years of plant life and 5% annual interest rate. Cost of electricity and hydrogen are found to be 0.049 $/kWh and 2.43 $/kg, with overall energy and exergy efficiencies of 5.9% and 17.8%, respectively. The highest cost contributors are the APC turbine and the PEM electrolyser where these two accounts for almost 94% of total plant cost. Total cost of the plant is found to be ∼$61200. Cost of produced hydrogen shows promising results compared to those of electrolysis-based hydrogen production systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yosaf, Salem & Ozcan, Hasan, 2018. "Exergoeconomic investigation of flue gas driven ejector absorption power system integrated with PEM electrolyser for hydrogen generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 88-99.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:163:y:2018:i:c:p:88-99
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218315536
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Ayanoglu, Abdulkadir & Abusoglu, Aysegul, 2011. "Exergoeconomic assessment of a geothermal assisted high temperature steam electrolysis system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4422-4433.
    2. Kannan, Nadarajah & Vakeesan, Divagar, 2016. "Solar energy for future world: - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1092-1105.
    3. Garousi Farshi, L. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2013. "Exergoeconomic comparison of double effect and combined ejector-double effect absorption refrigeration systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 700-711.
    4. Besagni, Giorgio & Mereu, Riccardo & Inzoli, Fabio, 2016. "Ejector refrigeration: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 373-407.
    5. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    6. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    7. Parikhani, Towhid & Ghaebi, Hadi & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2018. "A novel geothermal combined cooling and power cycle based on the absorption power cycle: Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 265-277.
    8. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 592-602.
    9. Miró, Laia & Gasia, Jaume & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2016. "Thermal energy storage (TES) for industrial waste heat (IWH) recovery: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 284-301.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alla Ali Ibrahim & Muhammet Kayfeci & Aleksandar G. Georgiev & Gülşah Karaca Dolgun & Ali Keçebaş, 2022. "Performance Assessment of a Novel Solar and Biomass-Based Multi-Generation System Equipped with Nanofluid-Based Compound Parabolic Collectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Cao, Yan & Rostamian, Fateme & Ebadollahi, Mohammad & Bezaatpour, Mojtaba & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2022. "Advanced exergy assessment of a solar absorption power cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 561-574.
    3. Tozlu, Alperen & Gençaslan, Betül & Özcan, Hasan, 2021. "Thermoeconomic analysis of a hybrid cogeneration plant with use of near-surface geothermal sources in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 237-250.
    4. Besagni, Giorgio, 2019. "Ejectors on the cutting edge: The past, the present and the perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 998-1003.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    4. Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    6. Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    7. Fidelis. I. Abam & Ogheneruona E. Diemuodeke & Ekwe. B. Ekwe & Mohammed Alghassab & Olusegun D. Samuel & Zafar A. Khan & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Farooq, 2020. "Exergoeconomic and Environmental Modeling of Integrated Polygeneration Power Plant with Biomass-Based Syngas Supplemental Firing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Mohammad Mehdi Parivazh & Milad Mousavi & Mansoor Naderi & Amir Rostami & Mahdieh Dibaj & Mohammad Akrami, 2022. "The Feasibility Study, Exergy, and Exergoeconomic Analyses of a Novel Flare Gas Recovery System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Pirmohamadi, Alireza & Ghazi, Mehrangiz & Nikian, Mohammad, 2019. "Optimal design of cogeneration systems in total site using exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1291-1302.
    10. Agudelo, Andrés & Valero, Antonio & Torres, César, 2012. "Allocation of waste cost in thermoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 634-643.
    11. Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Seyed Ali Banihashem & Mahyar Ghazvini & Milad Sadeghzadeh, 2018. "Thermo-economic and exergy assessment and optimization of performance of a hydrogen production system by using geothermal energy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(8), pages 1373-1392, December.
    12. Adriano da S. Marques & Monica Carvalho & Álvaro A. V. Ochoa & Ronelly J. Souza & Carlos A. C. dos Santos, 2020. "Exergoeconomic Assessment of a Compact Electricity-Cooling Cogeneration Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Wang, Shun-sen & Wu, Chuang & Li, Jun, 2018. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single-stage and multi-stage CO2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 559-577.
    14. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "ExRET-Opt: An automated exergy/exergoeconomic simulation framework for building energy retrofit analysis and design optimisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 33-58.
    15. Mohammadi, Amin & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2018. "A comprehensive review on coupling different types of electrolyzer to renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 632-655.
    16. Taleghani, S. Taslimi & Sorin, M. & Gaboury, S., 2021. "Thermo-economic analysis of heat-driven ejector system for cooling smelting process exhaust gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    17. Ligang Wang & Zhiping Yang & Shivom Sharma & Alberto Mian & Tzu-En Lin & George Tsatsaronis & François Maréchal & Yongping Yang, 2018. "A Review of Evaluation, Optimization and Synthesis of Energy Systems: Methodology and Application to Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-53, December.
    18. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    19. Alkan, Mehmet Ali & Keçebaş, Ali & Yamankaradeniz, Nurettin, 2013. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a district heating system for geothermal energy using specific exergy cost method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 426-434.
    20. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Fierro, José J. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Potential savings in the cement industry using waste heat recovery technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:163:y:2018:i:c:p:88-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.