IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8769-d865288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Ramin Ghiami Sardroud

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Mohsen Sadeghi

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Marc A. Rosen

    (Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada)

Abstract

The use of the organic Rankine cycle (ORC), organic flash cycle (OFC) and Kalina cycle (KC) is proposed to enhance the electricity generated by a supercritical CO 2 recompression Brayton (SCRB) cycle. Novel comparisons of the SCRB/ORC, SCRB/OFC and SCRB/KC integrated plants from thermodynamic, exergoeconomic and sustainability perspectives are performed to choose the most appropriate bottoming cycle for waste heat recovery for the SCRB cycle. For comprehensiveness, the performance of the SCRB/OFC and SCRB/ORC layouts are examined using ten working fluids. The influence of design parameters such as pressure ratio in the supercritical CO 2 (S-CO 2 ) cycle, pinch point temperature difference in heater and pre-cooler 1, turbine inlet temperature and pressure ratio for the ORC/OFC/Kalina cycles are examined for the main system indicators including the net output power, energy and exergy efficiencies, and unit cost of power production. The order of the exergy efficiencies for the proposed systems from highest to lowest is: SCRB/ORC, SCRB/OFC and SCRB/KC. The minimum unit cost of power production for the SCRB/ORC system is lower than that for the SCRB/KC and SCRB/OFC systems, by 1.97% and 0.75%, respectively. Additionally, the highest exergy efficiencies for the SCRB/OFC and SCRB/ORC systems are achieved when n-nonane and R134a are employed as working fluids for the OFC and ORC, respectively. According to thermodynamic optimization design, the SCRB/ORC, SCRB/OFC and SCRB/KC systems exhibit sustainability indexes of 3.55, 3.47 and 3.39, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8769-:d:865288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8769/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8769/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nemati, Arash & Nami, Hossein & Yari, Mortaza, 2018. "Assessment of different configurations of solar energy driven organic flash cycles (OFCs) via exergy and exergoeconomic methodologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1231-1248.
    2. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    3. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Song, Jian & Wang, Yaxiong & Wang, Kai & Wang, Jiangfeng & Markides, Christos N., 2021. "Combined supercritical CO2 (SCO2) cycle and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for hybrid solar and geothermal power generation: Thermoeconomic assessment of various configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1020-1035.
    5. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    6. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Nemati, Arash & ghavimi, Alireza & Yari, Mortaza, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 791-802.
    7. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    8. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    9. Alireza Javanshir & Nenad Sarunac & Zahra Razzaghpanah, 2017. "Thermodynamic Analysis of ORC and Its Application for Waste Heat Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Sarkar, Jahar, 2009. "Second law analysis of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1172-1178.
    11. Roy, J.P. & Mishra, M.K. & Misra, Ashok, 2010. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5049-5062.
    12. Aljundi, Isam H., 2011. "Effect of dry hydrocarbons and critical point temperature on the efficiencies of organic Rankine cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1196-1202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Zhang, Yuan & Liang, Tianyang & Yang, Ke, 2022. "An integrated energy storage system consisting of Compressed Carbon dioxide energy storage and Organic Rankine Cycle: Exergoeconomic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Fan, Gang & Lu, Xiaochen & Chen, Kang & Zhang, Yicen & Han, Zihao & Yu, Haibin & Dai, Yiping, 2022. "Comparative analysis on design and off-design performance of novel cascade CO2 combined cycles for gas turbine waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    5. Kang, Lixia & Tang, Jianping & Liu, Yongzhong, 2021. "Optimal design of organic Rankine cycle system for multi-source waste heat recovery involving multi-period operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Alharbi, Sattam & Elsayed, Mohamed L. & Chow, Louis C., 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an integrated system of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and multi-effect desalination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Wang, Shun-sen & Wu, Chuang & Li, Jun, 2018. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single-stage and multi-stage CO2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 559-577.
    8. Karimi, Shahram & Mansouri, Sima, 2018. "A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 600-619.
    9. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    10. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Tang, Junrong & Li, Qibin & Wang, Shukun & Yu, Haoshui, 2023. "Thermo-economic optimization and comparative analysis of different organic flash cycles for the supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    12. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.
    13. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    14. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    15. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    16. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    18. Daniarta, Sindu & Nemś, Magdalena & Kolasiński, Piotr, 2023. "A review on thermal energy storage applicable for low- and medium-temperature organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    19. Al Jubori, Ayad M. & Al-Dadah, Raya & Mahmoud, Saad, 2017. "Performance enhancement of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle radial-inflow turbine through multi-objective optimization algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 297-311.
    20. Xie, Yingchun & Nie, Yutai & Li, Tailu & Zhang, Yao & Wang, Jingyi, 2023. "Flash evaporation strategy of organic Rankine cycle for geothermal power performance enhancement: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 57-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8769-:d:865288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.