IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v109y2016icp791-802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures

Author

Listed:
  • Sadeghi, Mohsen
  • Nemati, Arash
  • ghavimi, Alireza
  • Yari, Mortaza

Abstract

In this paper, the performance of the ORC (organic Rankine cycle) powered by geothermal water, in three different configurations, including the simple ORC, PTORC (parallel two-stage ORC) and STORC (series two-stage ORC), using zeotrpoic working fluids is investigated from the viewpoints of the energy and exergy. In addition, considering the net power output and TSP (turbine size parameter) as the two objective functions, the multi-objective optimization with the aim of maximizing the first function and minimizing the second one, is performed to determine the optimal values of decision variables including evaporators 1 and 2 pressure, the pinch point temperature difference and the superheating degree. The results show that using zeotropic mixtures as the working fluid instead of a pure fluid such as R245fa, leads to 27.76%, 24.98% and 24.79% improvement in power generation in the simple ORC, PTORC and STORC, respectively and also lower values of TSP.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadeghi, Mohsen & Nemati, Arash & ghavimi, Alireza & Yari, Mortaza, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 791-802.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:791-802
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216305746
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heberle, Florian & Preißinger, Markus & Brüggemann, Dieter, 2012. "Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 364-370.
    2. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    3. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Chitsaz, Ata & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Thermoeconomic optimization using an evolutionary algorithm of a trigeneration system driven by a solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 191-204.
    4. Liu, Bo-Tau & Chien, Kuo-Hsiang & Wang, Chi-Chuan, 2004. "Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1207-1217.
    5. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    6. Bianchi, M. & De Pascale, A., 2011. "Bottoming cycles for electric energy generation: Parametric investigation of available and innovative solutions for the exploitation of low and medium temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1500-1509, May.
    7. Habka, Muhsen & Ajib, Salman, 2015. "Evaluation of mixtures performances in Organic Rankine Cycle when utilizing the geothermal water with and without cogeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 567-576.
    8. Ho, Tony & Mao, Samuel S. & Greif, Ralph, 2012. "Increased power production through enhancements to the Organic Flash Cycle (OFC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 686-695.
    9. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    10. Zhang, H.G. & Wang, E.H. & Fan, B.Y., 2013. "A performance analysis of a novel system of a dual loop bottoming organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with a light-duty diesel engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1504-1513.
    11. Konak, Abdullah & Coit, David W. & Smith, Alice E., 2006. "Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(9), pages 992-1007.
    12. Li, Tailu & Zhang, Zhigang & Lu, Jian & Yang, Junlan & Hu, Yujie, 2015. "Two-stage evaporation strategy to improve system performance for organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 323-334.
    13. Yue, Chen & Han, Dong & Pu, Wenhao & He, Weifeng, 2015. "Thermal matching performance of a geothermal ORC system using zeotropic working fluids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 746-754.
    14. Li, You-Rong & Du, Mei-Tang & Wu, Chun-Mei & Wu, Shuang-Ying & Liu, Chao, 2014. "Potential of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures as working fluids for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 509-519.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Collings, Peter, 2017. "Dynamic control strategy of a distillation system for a composition-adjustable organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1038-1051.
    2. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    3. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Zhou, Yuhong & Li, Shanshan & Sun, Lei & Zhao, Shupeng & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2020. "Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    6. Li, Tailu & Zhang, Zhigang & Lu, Jian & Yang, Junlan & Hu, Yujie, 2015. "Two-stage evaporation strategy to improve system performance for organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 323-334.
    7. Collings, Peter & Yu, Zhibin & Wang, Enhua, 2016. "A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-591.
    8. Li, Tailu & Wang, Qiulin & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Fu, Wencheng, 2015. "Thermodynamic optimization of organic Rankine cycle using two-stage evaporation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 654-664.
    9. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    10. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    11. Wang, Zhiqi & Zhao, Yabin & Xia, Xiaoxia & Pan, Huihui & Zhang, Sifeng & Liu, Zhipeng, 2023. "Experimental evaluation of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture under different operation conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    12. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Yun, Eunkoo & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2015. "Experimental study of a 1 kw organic Rankine cycle with a zeotropic mixture of R245fa/R134a," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2363-2373.
    13. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Michał Kaczmarczyk & Barbara Tomaszewska & Leszek Pająk, 2020. "Geological and Thermodynamic Analysis of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation Using ORC and Kalina Cycle Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Lee, Ung & Jeon, Jeongwoo & Han, Chonghun & Lim, Youngsub, 2017. "Superstructure based techno-economic optimization of the organic rankine cycle using LNG cryogenic energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 83-94.
    16. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    17. Hærvig, J. & Sørensen, K. & Condra, T.J., 2016. "Guidelines for optimal selection of working fluid for an organic Rankine cycle in relation to waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 592-602.
    18. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    19. Ziviani, Davide & Beyene, Asfaw & Venturini, Mauro, 2014. "Advances and challenges in ORC systems modeling for low grade thermal energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 79-95.
    20. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng & Cao, Liyan & Wang, Yu, 2016. "Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 470-487.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:791-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.