IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v194y2020ics0360544219324806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Yuhong
  • Li, Shanshan
  • Sun, Lei
  • Zhao, Shupeng
  • Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman

Abstract

Organic Rankine cycle is a power generation system for the widespread use of the medium to low-enthalpy thermal energy. Using the dual-pressure evaporation cycle and zeotropic mixtures are important approaches to increase the efficiency of an organic Rankine cycle system. This work proposes a thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal cycle for power generation aims where the binary cycle used is a dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle in which different mixtures of zeotropic fluids are used as the working fluid. Integration of dual-pressure ORC and zeotropic mixtures presents the remarkable capability to combine their superiority and further enhance the system performance considerably. The superiority of the proposed system, which combines the advantages of zeotropic mixtures with DORC positive aspects, is revealed through the energy and exergy analysis. Also, the particle swarm optimizer (PSO) is employed to optimize the net output power as the objective function. The results reveal some precious facts; for instance, the overall thermal and exergy efficiencies are obtained 18.23% and 62.37%, respectively for the base case. However, the optimized results demonstrate that the Pentane (0.539)/Cis-2-butene (0.461) and Pentane (0.527)/Trans-2-butene (0.473) combinations hold the maximum energetic efficiency of 18.43% and 18.41%, respectively. The net output powers for these combinations are 5983.19kW and 6011.17kW, respectively. Also, a comparative analysis of the presented system with those from literature illustrates that the presented power generation system generates more power and shows higher energetic and exergetic efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Yuhong & Li, Shanshan & Sun, Lei & Zhao, Shupeng & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2020. "Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219324806
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219324806
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Nemati, Arash & ghavimi, Alireza & Yari, Mortaza, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 791-802.
    2. Heberle, Florian & Preißinger, Markus & Brüggemann, Dieter, 2012. "Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 364-370.
    3. Chys, M. & van den Broek, M. & Vanslambrouck, B. & De Paepe, M., 2012. "Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 623-632.
    4. Shortall, Ruth & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Axelsson, Guðni, 2015. "Geothermal energy for sustainable development: A review of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 391-406.
    5. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    6. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    7. Dincer, Ibrahim, 2000. "Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 157-175, June.
    8. Najafi, Gholamhassan & Ghobadian, Barat, 2011. "Geothermal resources in Iran: The sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3946-3951.
    9. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    10. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Effects of heat source temperature and mixture composition on the combined superiority of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 436-449.
    11. Ahmadi, Samareh & Ghaebi, Hadi & Shokri, Afshar, 2019. "A comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a novel CHP system based on SOFC and APC cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    12. Habka, Muhsen & Ajib, Salman, 2015. "Evaluation of mixtures performances in Organic Rankine Cycle when utilizing the geothermal water with and without cogeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 567-576.
    13. Zeyghami, Mehdi, 2015. "Performance analysis and binary working fluid selection of combined flash-binary geothermal cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 765-774.
    14. Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2015. "Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation Using Zeotropic Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-28, March.
    15. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    16. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    17. Yue, Chen & Han, Dong & Pu, Wenhao & He, Weifeng, 2015. "Thermal matching performance of a geothermal ORC system using zeotropic working fluids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 746-754.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Fei & Yang, Changjin & Li, Biao & Silang, Yangji & Zhu, Yuhui & Farkoush, Saeid Gholami, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic sensitivity analyses of a geothermal-based trigeneration system; performance enhancement through determining the best zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Zhang, Hongsheng & Hao, Ruijun & Liu, Xingang & Zhang, Ning & Guo, Wenli & Zhang, Zhenghui & Liu, Chengjun & Liu, Yifeng & Duan, Chenghong & Qin, Jiyun, 2022. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of an improved coal-fired power generation system coupled with geothermal energy based on organic Rankine cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 273-290.
    3. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Grispos, Victoras & Karellas, Sotirios, 2021. "Exergetic efficiency potential of double-stage ORCs with zeotropic mixtures of natural hydrocarbons and CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    5. Mahmoud, Montaser & Alkhedher, Mohammad & Ramadan, Mohamad & Naher, Sumsun & Pullen, Keith, 2022. "An investigation on organic Rankine cycle incorporating a ground-cooled condenser: Working fluid selection and regeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Su, Dawei, 2022. "Comprehensive thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses and multi-objective optimization of a compressed air energy storage hybridized with a parabolic trough solar collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    7. Wanming Pan & Junkang Li & Guotao Zhang & Le Zhou & Ming Tu, 2022. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Tractor Waste Heat Recovery Based on Particle Swarm Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Zhang, Mingming & Timoshin, Anton & Al-Ammar, Essam A. & Sillanpaa, Mika & Zhang, Guiju, 2023. "Power, cooling, freshwater, and hydrogen production system from a new integrated system working with the zeotropic mixture, using a flash-binary geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    9. Wang, Enhua & Zhang, Mengru & Meng, Fanxiao & Zhang, Hongguang, 2022. "Zeotropic working fluid selection for an organic Rankine cycle bottoming with a marine engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Bai, Hao & Luo, ShiHao & Zhao, Xijie & Zhao, Gen & Gao, Yang, 2022. "Comprehensive assessment of a green cogeneration system based on compressed air energy storage (CAES) and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    11. Feili, Milad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2022. "Thermo-mechanical energy level approach integrated with exergoeconomic optimization for realistic cost evaluation of a novel micro-CCHP system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 630-657.
    12. Hai, Tao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Abed, Hooman & Chauhan, Bhupendra Singh & Ahmed, Ahmed Najat, 2023. "Exergy-economic study and multi-objective optimization of a geothermal-based combined organic flash cycle and PEMFC for poly-generation purpose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    13. Zhou, Zongming & Cao, Yan & Anqi, Ali E. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed & Rajhi, Ali A. & Alamri, Sagr, 2022. "Converting a geothermal-driven steam flash cycle into a high-performance polygeneration system by waste heat recovery: 3E analysis and Genetic-Fgoalattain optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 609-627.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Feili, Milad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2022. "Thermo-mechanical energy level approach integrated with exergoeconomic optimization for realistic cost evaluation of a novel micro-CCHP system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 630-657.
    3. Magdalena Santos-Rodriguez, M. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A stochastic optimization approach for the design of organic fluid mixtures for low-temperature heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 145-159.
    4. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    5. Schilling, J. & Entrup, M. & Hopp, M. & Gross, J. & Bardow, A., 2021. "Towards optimal mixtures of working fluids: Integrated design of processes and mixtures for Organic Rankine Cycles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Collings, Peter, 2017. "Dynamic control strategy of a distillation system for a composition-adjustable organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1038-1051.
    8. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    9. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Effects of heat source temperature and mixture composition on the combined superiority of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 436-449.
    10. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    11. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    12. Kajurek, Jakub & Rusowicz, Artur & Grzebielec, Andrzej & Bujalski, Wojciech & Futyma, Kamil & Rudowicz, Zbigniew, 2019. "Selection of refrigerants for a modified organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-8.
    13. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    16. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    17. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Nemati, Arash & ghavimi, Alireza & Yari, Mortaza, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of various ORC (organic Rankine cycle) configurations using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 791-802.
    18. Kolahchian Tabrizi, Mehrshad & Bonalumi, Davide, 2022. "Techno-economic performance of the 2-propanol/1-butanol zeotropic mixture and 2-propanol/water azeotropic mixture as a working fluid in Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    19. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    20. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Preißinger, Markus & Brüggemann, Dieter & Karellas, Sotirios & Panopoulos, Kyriakos, 2015. "Low grade waste heat recovery with subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle based on natural refrigerants and their binary mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 80-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219324806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.