IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i11p3286-d568728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and Water Policies in Chile, Two Different Endings with Implications in the Water-Energy Nexus

Author

Listed:
  • Roxana Bórquez

    (Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2), University of Chile, Blanco Encalada 2002, 4 Piso, DGF, Santiago 8370449, Chile
    Department of Geography, King’s College London, 40 Bush House (North East Wing), Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, UK)

  • Rodrigo Fuster

    (Department of Environmental Sciences and Renewable Natural Resources, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Chile, Avenida Santa Rosa 11316, La Pintana, Santiago 8820808, Chile)

Abstract

Energy and water have faced important levels of conflicts in the last 20–25 years in Chile. However, the way that they have been politically addressed in the last decade differs. These differences emerge from how these fields have been historically configurated, impacting on how the policy problems and policy options have been framed. Using thematic analysis of 93 interviews and documentary analysis, this article analyzes by contrasting two participatory processes which nourish the formulation of the energy and water policies in Chile in 2014–2015. It seeks to understand the factors that may influence why the development, impact and inclusion of new voices in public policies related to water and energy have been different, and how that can impact the water–energy nexus. Five factors emerge as determinants in this difference: structure of use, number of actors, governance and institutional framework, elite conformation, and legal framework. These factors impacted the policy processes and the scope of the policy outcomes, generating two different results: a long-term energy policy, and a water policy that did not survive the presidential period. Thus, the water–energy nexus is under pressure as a result of the tension between power structures, social responses to environmental issues and decision-making, environmental limitations, and climate change stressors, creating greater vulnerability and conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Roxana Bórquez & Rodrigo Fuster, 2021. "Energy and Water Policies in Chile, Two Different Endings with Implications in the Water-Energy Nexus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3286-:d:568728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javier Bustos-Salvagno & Fernando Fuentes H., 2017. "Electricity Interconnection in Chile: Prices versus Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Bauer, Carl J., 1997. "Bringing water markets down to earth: The political economy of water rights in Chile, 1976-1995," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 639-656, May.
    3. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2006. "Electricity market reform: What has the experience taught us thus far?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 63-75, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrés Ortega-Ballesteros & Francisco Iturriaga-Bustos & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno & David Muñoz-Rodríguez, 2022. "Advanced Pressure Management for Sustainable Leakage Reduction and Service Optimization: A Case Study in Central Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Narain, V., 2009. "Water rights system as a demand management option: potentials, constraints and prospects," IWMI Books, Reports H042163, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Palanisami, Kuppannan, 2009. "Water markets as a demand management option: potentials, problems and prospects," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Olave-Rojas, David & Álvarez-Miranda, Eduardo, 2021. "Towards a complex investment evaluation framework for renewable energy systems: A 2-level heuristic approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Cheng, Chuntian & Chen, Fu & Li, Gang & Ristić, Bora & Mirchi, Ali & Qiyu, Tu & Madani, Kaveh, 2018. "Reform and renewables in China: The architecture of Yunnan's hydropower dominated electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 682-693.
    5. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2014. "Investment, security of supply and sustainability in the aftermath of three decades of power sector reform," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-8.
    6. Giannoccaro, Giacomo & Pedraza, Veronica & Berbel, Julio, 2012. "Barriers to water markets in agriculture. Analysis of Southern Spain stakeholder attitudes," 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy 124113, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    7. Heffron, Raphael J. & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Sumarno, Theresia & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2022. "How different electricity pricing systems affect the energy trilemma: Assessing Indonesia's electricity market transition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. El Hage, Fabio S. & Rufín, Carlos, 2016. "Context analysis for a new regulatory model for electric utilities in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 145-154.
    9. Srivastava, S.K. & Kumar, Ranjit & Singh, R.P., 2009. "Extent of Groundwater Extraction and Irrigation Efficiency on Farms under Different Water-market Regimes in Central Uttar Pradesh," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 22(1), January.
    10. Manuschevich, Daniela, 2016. "Neoliberalization of forestry discourses in Chile," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 21-30.
    11. Shi, Tian, 2006. "Simplifying complexity: Rationalising water entitlements in the Southern Connected River Murray System, Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 229-239, December.
    12. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2011. "The impact of power market reforms on electricity price-cost margins and cross-subsidy levels: A cross country panel data analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1080-1092, March.
    13. Chen, Wei-Ming, 2019. "The U.S. electricity market twenty years after restructuring: A review experience in the state of Delaware," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 24-32.
    14. Hakan Çelıkkol & Fatma Köse, 2015. "SWOT analysis of Turkish Energy Market in the context of Electricity Market in the context of electricity market," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 4(2), pages 27-41.
    15. Gencer, Busra & Larsen, Erik Reimer & van Ackere, Ann, 2020. "Understanding the coevolution of electricity markets and regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. Kuppannan, Palanisami, 2009. "Water markets as a demand management option: potentials, problems and prospects," IWMI Books, Reports H042160, International Water Management Institute.
    17. Zhang, Jun-Lian & Zhang, Feng-Rong, 2008. "Mutual monitoring in a tradable water rights system: A case study of Zhangye City in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 331-338, March.
    18. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2013. "Implications of liberalization policies on government support to R&D: Lessons from electricity markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 110-118.
    19. Jacques Pelkmans & Lionel Kapff, 2010. "Interconnector Investment for a Well-functioning Internal Market. What EU regime of regulatory incentives?," Bruges European Economic Research Papers 18, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    20. Hazleen Aris & Iskandar Shah Mohd Zawawi & Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen, 2020. "The Philippines’ and Singapore’s Journeys towards Liberalised Electricity Supply Industries—Takeaways for Malaysia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3286-:d:568728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.