IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i10p1951-d233190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintenance Strategy Optimization of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Cooling Tower through Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur H.A. Melani

    (Mechatronics and Mechanical System Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil)

  • Carlos A. Murad

    (Mechatronics and Mechanical System Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil)

  • Adherbal Caminada Netto

    (Mechatronics and Mechanical System Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil)

  • Gilberto F.M. Souza

    (Mechatronics and Mechanical System Engineering Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil)

  • Silvio I. Nabeta

    (Energy and Electrical Automation Department, Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

Abstract

Determining the ideal size of maintenance staff is a daunting task, especially in the operation of large and complex mechanical systems such as thermal power plants. On the one hand, a significant investment in maintenance is necessary to maintain the availability of the system. On the other hand, it can significantly affect the profit of the plant. Several mathematical modeling techniques have been used in many different ways to predict and improve the availability and reliability of such systems. This work uses a modeling tool called generalized stochastic Petri net (GSPN) in a new way, aiming to determine the effect that the number of maintenance teams has on the availability and performance of a coal-fired power plant cooling tower. The results obtained through the model are confronted with a thermodynamic analysis of the cooling tower that shows the influence of this system’s performance on the efficiency of the power plant. Thus, it is possible to determine the optimal size of the repair team in order to maximize the plant’s performance with the least possible investment in maintenance personnel.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur H.A. Melani & Carlos A. Murad & Adherbal Caminada Netto & Gilberto F.M. Souza & Silvio I. Nabeta, 2019. "Maintenance Strategy Optimization of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Cooling Tower through Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:10:p:1951-:d:233190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/10/1951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/10/1951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Y.G. & Nilkitsaranont, P., 2009. "Gas turbine performance prognostic for condition-based maintenance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 2152-2161, October.
    2. Nývlt, Ondřej & Rausand, Marvin, 2012. "Dependencies in event trees analyzed by Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 45-57.
    3. Carazas, F.G. & Souza, G.F.M., 2010. "Risk-based decision making method for maintenance policy selection of thermal power plant equipment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 964-975.
    4. Faisal Khan & Mahmoud Haddara & Mohamed Khalifa, 2012. "Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance (RBIM) of Power Plants," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza (ed.), Thermal Power Plant Performance Analysis, edition 127, pages 249-279, Springer.
    5. Wang, Wenbin, 2007. "A two-stage prognosis model in condition based maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1177-1187, November.
    6. N.S. Bhangu & R. Singh & G.L. Pahuja, 2011. "Reliability centred maintenance in a thermal power plant: a case study," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 209-228.
    7. Carazas, F.J.G. & Salazar, C.H. & Souza, G.F.M., 2011. "Availability analysis of heat recovery steam generators used in thermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3855-3870.
    8. Niu, Gang & Yang, Bo-Suk & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 786-796.
    9. Yianni, Panayioti C. & Neves, Luis C. & Rama, Dovile & Andrews, John D., 2018. "Accelerating Petri-Net simulations using NVIDIA Graphics Processing Units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 361-371.
    10. Selvik, J.T. & Aven, T., 2011. "A framework for reliability and risk centered maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 324-331.
    11. Balakrishnan, N. & Kateri, M., 2008. "On the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of Weibull distribution based on complete and censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(17), pages 2971-2975, December.
    12. Andrews, John & Prescott, Darren & De Rozières, Florian, 2014. "A stochastic model for railway track asset management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 76-84.
    13. Melani, Arthur Henrique Andrade & Murad, Carlos Alberto & Caminada Netto, Adherbal & Souza, Gilberto Francisco Martha de & Nabeta, Silvio Ikuyo, 2018. "Criticality-based maintenance of a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 767-781.
    14. García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Tobias, Andrew Mark & Pinar Pérez, Jesús María & Papaelias, Mayorkinos, 2012. "Condition monitoring of wind turbines: Techniques and methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 169-178.
    15. Ayang, Albert & Wamkeue, René & Ouhrouche, Mohand & Djongyang, Noël & Essiane Salomé, Ndjakomo & Pombe, Joseph Kessel & Ekemb, Gabriel, 2019. "Maximum likelihood parameters estimation of single-diode model of photovoltaic generator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 111-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tae-Woo Kim & Yenjae Chang & Dae-Wook Kim & Man-Keun Kim, 2020. "Preventive Maintenance and Forced Outages in Power Plants in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Jakov Batelić & Karlo Griparić & Dario Matika, 2021. "Impact of Remediation-Based Maintenance on the Reliability of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Using Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Arthur Henrique de Andrade Melani & Miguel Angelo de Carvalho Michalski & Carlos Alberto Murad & Adherbal Caminada Netto & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza, 2022. "Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets for Planning and Optimizing Maintenance Logistics of Small Hydroelectric Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Emil Cazacu & Lucian-Gabriel Petrescu & Valentin Ioniță, 2022. "Smart Predictive Maintenance Device for Critical In-Service Motors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Renan Favarão da Silva & Marjorie Maria Bellinello & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza & Sara Antomarioni & Maurizio Bevilacqua & Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica, 2021. "Deciding a Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Method to Prioritize Maintenance Work Orders of Hydroelectric Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Yamano, Shuhei & Nakaya, Takashi & Ikegami, Takashi & Nakayama, Masayuki & Akisawa, Atsushi, 2021. "Optimization modeling of mixed gas engine types with different maintenance spans and costs: Case study OF CCHP to evaluate optimal gas engine operations and combination of the types," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Yang & Liu, Qingyou & Jing, Jiajia & Yang, Yan & Zou, Zhengwei, 2017. "A framework for identification of maintenance significant items in reliability centered maintenance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1295-1303.
    2. Navneet Singh Bhangu & G. L. Pahuja & Rupinder Singh, 2017. "Enhancing reliability of thermal power plant by implementing RCM policy and developing reliability prediction model: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1923-1936, November.
    3. Martyna Tomala & Andrzej Rusin & Adam Wojaczek, 2020. "Risk-Based Planning of Diagnostic Testing of Turbines Operating with Increased Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Zhou, Dengji & Zhang, Huisheng & Weng, Shilie, 2014. "A novel prognostic model of performance degradation trend for power machinery maintenance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 740-746.
    5. Adherbal Caminada Netto & Arthur Henrique de Andrade Melani & Carlos Alberto Murad & Miguel Angelo de Carvalho Michalski & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza & Silvio Ikuyo Nabeta, 2020. "A Novel Approach to Defining Maintenance Significant Items: A Hydro Generator Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Afzali, Peyman & Keynia, Farshid & Rashidinejad, Masoud, 2019. "A new model for reliability-centered maintenance prioritisation of distribution feeders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 701-709.
    7. Zhou, Dengji & Yu, Ziqiang & Zhang, Huisheng & Weng, Shilie, 2016. "A novel grey prognostic model based on Markov process and grey incidence analysis for energy conversion equipment degradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 420-429.
    8. Cha, Guesik & Park, Junseok & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2023. "Military aircraft flight and maintenance planning model considering heterogeneous maintenance tasks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    9. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Rusin, Andrzej & Wojaczek, Adam, 2019. "Improving the availability and lengthening the life of power unit elements through the use of risk-based maintenance planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 28-35.
    11. Zhang, Haoyuan & Marsh, D. William R, 2021. "Managing infrastructure asset: Bayesian networks for inspection and maintenance decisions reasoning and planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    12. Chen, Xuejun & Yang, Yongming & Cui, Zhixin & Shen, Jun, 2019. "Vibration fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on variational mode decomposition and energy entropy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1100-1109.
    13. Beganovic, Nejra & Söffker, Dirk, 2016. "Structural health management utilization for lifetime prognosis and advanced control strategy deployment of wind turbines: An overview and outlook concerning actual methods, tools, and obtained result," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 68-83.
    14. Segovia Ramírez, Isaac & Pliego Marugán, Alberto & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2022. "A novel approach to optimize the positioning and measurement parameters in photovoltaic aerial inspections," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 371-389.
    15. Quintanilha, Igor M. & Elias, Vitor R.M. & da Silva, Felipe B. & Fonini, Pedro A.M. & da Silva, Eduardo A.B. & Netto, Sergio L. & Apolinário, José A. & de Campos, Marcello L.R. & Martins, Wallace A., 2021. "A fault detector/classifier for closed-ring power generators using machine learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    16. Marcus Johnen & Stefan Bedbur & Udo Kamps, 2020. "A note on multiple roots of a likelihood equation for Weibull sequential order statistics," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 519-525, May.
    17. Benjamin Laumen & Erhard Cramer, 2021. "k‐step stage life testing," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 75(2), pages 203-233, May.
    18. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    19. Bon-Yong Koo & Dae-Yi Jung, 2019. "A Comparative Study on Primary Bearing Rating Life of a 5-MW Two-Blade Wind Turbine System Based on Two Different Control Domains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:10:p:1951-:d:233190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.