IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i12p3511-d190998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life-Cycle Cost Minimization of Gas Turbine Power Cycles for Distributed Power Generation Using Sequential Quadratic Programming Method

Author

Listed:
  • Satriya Sulistiyo Aji

    (Department of Environment & Energy Mechanical Engineering, University of Science & Technology (UST), 156 Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

  • Young Sang Kim

    (Department of Clean Fuel & Power Generation, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KIMM), 156 Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

  • Kook Young Ahn

    (Department of Environment & Energy Mechanical Engineering, University of Science & Technology (UST), 156 Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Korea
    Department of Clean Fuel & Power Generation, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KIMM), 156 Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

  • Young Duk Lee

    (Department of Environment & Energy Mechanical Engineering, University of Science & Technology (UST), 156 Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Korea
    Department of Clean Fuel & Power Generation, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KIMM), 156 Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34103, Korea)

Abstract

The life-cycle cost reduction of medium-class gas turbine power plants was investigated using the mathematical optimization technique. Three different types of gas turbine power cycles—a simple cycle, a regenerative cycle, and a combined cycle—were examined, and their optimal design conditions were determined using the sequential quadratic programming (SQP) technique. As a modeling reference, the Siemens SGT-700 gas turbine was chosen and its technical data were used for system simulation and validation. Through optimization using the SQP method, the overall costs of the simple cycle, regenerative cycle, and combined cycle were reduced by 7.4%, 12.0%, and 3.9%, respectively, compared to the cost of the base cases. To examine the effect of economic parameters on the optimal design condition and cost, different values of fuel costs, interest rates, and discount rates were applied to the cost calculation, and the optimization results were analyzed and compared. The values were chosen to reflect different countries’ economic situations: South Korea, China, India, and Indonesia. For South Korea and China, the optimal design condition is proposed near the upper bound of the variation range, implying that the efficiency improvement plays an important role in cost reduction. For India and Indonesia, the optimal condition is proposed in the middle of the variation ranges. Even for India and Indonesia, the fuel cost has the largest contribution to the total cost, accounting for more than 60%.

Suggested Citation

  • Satriya Sulistiyo Aji & Young Sang Kim & Kook Young Ahn & Young Duk Lee, 2018. "Life-Cycle Cost Minimization of Gas Turbine Power Cycles for Distributed Power Generation Using Sequential Quadratic Programming Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3511-:d:190998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Knight & Sai Ding, 2010. "Why Does China Invest So Much?," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 9(3), pages 87-117, Fall.
    2. Kyle Klein & Julian Neira, 2014. "Nelder-Mead Simplex Optimization Routine for Large-Scale Problems: A Distributed Memory Implementation," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 447-461, April.
    3. Paltsev, Sergey & Zhang, Danwei, 2015. "Natural gas pricing reform in China: Getting closer to a market system?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 43-56.
    4. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2011. "Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5886-5898.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morales Sandoval, Daniel A. & Saikia, Pranaynil & De la Cruz-Loredo, Ivan & Zhou, Yue & Ugalde-Loo, Carlos E. & Bastida, Héctor & Abeysekera, Muditha, 2023. "A framework for the assessment of optimal and cost-effective energy decarbonisation pathways of a UK-based healthcare facility11The short version of the paper was presented at ICAE2022, Bochum, German," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    2. Paweł Ocłoń & Maciej Ławryńczuk & Marek Czamara, 2021. "A New Solar Assisted Heat Pump System with Underground Energy Storage: Modelling and Optimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Seyam, Shaimaa & Dincer, Ibrahim & Agelin-Chaab, Martin, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a potential marine engine powered by eco-friendly fuel blends with hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    4. Jung, Sungyup & Kwon, Dohee & Park, Young-Kwon & Lee, Kyun Ho & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2020. "Power generation using rice husk derived fuels from CO2-assisted catalytic pyrolysis over Co/Al2O3," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Seyam, Shaimaa & Dincer, Ibrahim & Agelin-Chaab, Martin, 2022. "Exergetic assessment of a newly designed solid oxide fuel cell-based system combined with a propulsion engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sahu, Mithilesh Kumar & Sanjay,, 2017. "Comparative exergoeconomics of power utilities: Air-cooled gas turbine cycle and combined cycle configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 42-51.
    2. Zhang, Yi & Ji, Qiang & Fan, Ying, 2018. "The price and income elasticity of China's natural gas demand: A multi-sectoral perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 332-341.
    3. Sai Ding & Alessandra Guariglia & John Knight & Junhong Yang, 2021. "Negative Investment in China: Financing Constraints and Restructuring versus Growth," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1411-1449.
    4. Anvari, Simin & Mahian, Omid & Taghavifar, Hadi & Wongwises, Somchai & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "4E analysis of a modified multigeneration system designed for power, heating/cooling, and water desalination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Burke, Paul J. & Yang, Hewen, 2016. "The price and income elasticities of natural gas demand: International evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 466-474.
    6. Wang, Zhen & Duan, Liqiang & Zhang, Zuxian, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of gas turbine combined cycle system considering environmental damage cost of pollution emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    7. Sarmiza Pencea & Iulia Monica Oehler-Sincai, 2015. "Investment-Led Development In China – From Past Accomplishments, To Future Challenges," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 10(2), pages 87-102, June.
    8. Shangfeng Han & Baosheng Zhang & Xiaoyang Sun & Song Han & Mikael Höök, 2017. "China’s Energy Transition in the Power and Transport Sectors from a Substitution Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    10. Sai Ding & John Knight & Xiao Zhang, 2019. "Does China overinvest? Evidence from a panel of Chinese firms," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 489-507, April.
    11. Bakhshmand, Sina Kazemi & Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti & Bahlouli, Keyvan & Eftekhari, Hajar & Ebrahimi, Afshin, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle plant using evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 555-567.
    12. Primabudi, Eko & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant (C3MR) LNG process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 492-504.
    13. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2017. "Optimal design, operation and analytical criteria for determining optimal operating modes of a CCHP with fired HRSG, boiler, electric chiller and absorption chiller," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1052-1065.
    14. Wang, Zuyi & Kim, Man-Keun, 2022. "Price bubbles in oil & gas markets and their transfer," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Gu, Tao, 2019. "Wage determination and fixed capital investment in an imperfect financial market: the case of China," MPRA Paper 95986, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Sanusi, Yinka S. & Mokheimer, Esmail M.A., 2019. "Thermo-economic optimization of hydrogen production in a membrane-SMR integrated to ITM-oxy-combustion plant using genetic algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 164-176.
    17. Alobaid, Falah & Karner, Karl & Belz, Jörg & Epple, Bernd & Kim, Hyun-Gee, 2014. "Numerical and experimental study of a heat recovery steam generator during start-up procedure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1057-1070.
    18. John Knight & Wei Wang, 2011. "China’s Macroeconomic Imbalances: Causes and Consequences," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(9), pages 1476-1506, September.
    19. Zhou, Zhongbing & Qin, Quande, 2020. "Decoding China's natural gas development: A critical discourse analysis of the five-year plans," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Li, Lanlan & Luo, Xuan & Zhou, Kaile & Xu, Tingting, 2018. "Evaluation of increasing block pricing for households' natural gas: A case study of Beijing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 162-172.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3511-:d:190998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.