IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i11p1914-d119617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Interval Fuzzy-Stochastic Chance-Constrained Programming Based Energy-Water Nexus Model for Planning Electric Power Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Liu

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

  • Yongping Li

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
    School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainability Research, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Guohe Huang

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
    School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainability Research, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada)

  • Cai Suo

    (Sino-Canada Energy and Environmental Research Center, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shuo Yin

    (State Grid Henan Economic Research Institute; No. 87 South Songshan Road, Zhengzhou 450052, China)

Abstract

In this study, an interval fuzzy-stochastic chance-constrained programming based energy-water nexus (IFSCP-WEN) model is developed for planning electric power system (EPS). The IFSCP-WEN model can tackle uncertainties expressed as possibility and probability distributions, as well as interval values. Different credibility (i.e., γ ) levels and probability (i.e., q i ) levels are set to reflect relationships among water supply, electricity generation, system cost, and constraint-violation risk. Results reveal that different γ and q i levels can lead to a changed system cost, imported electricity, electricity generation, and water supply. Results also disclose that the study EPS would tend to the transition from coal-dominated into clean energy-dominated. Gas-fired would be the main electric utility to supply electricity at the end of the planning horizon, occupying [28.47, 30.34]% (where 28.47% and 30.34% present the lower bound and the upper bound of interval value, respectively) of the total electricity generation. Correspondingly, water allocated to gas-fired would reach the highest, occupying [33.92, 34.72]% of total water supply. Surface water would be the main water source, accounting for more than [40.96, 43.44]% of the total water supply. The ratio of recycled water to total water supply would increase by about [11.37, 14.85]%. Results of the IFSCP-WEN model present its potential for sustainable EPS planning by co-optimizing energy and water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Liu & Yongping Li & Guohe Huang & Cai Suo & Shuo Yin, 2017. "An Interval Fuzzy-Stochastic Chance-Constrained Programming Based Energy-Water Nexus Model for Planning Electric Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1914-:d:119617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/11/1914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rob J Hyndman & Shu Fan, 2008. "Density forecasting for long-term peak electricity demand," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 6/08, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    2. Seddighi, Amir Hossein & Ahmadi-Javid, Amir, 2015. "Integrated multiperiod power generation and transmission expansion planning with sustainability aspects in a stochastic environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 9-18.
    3. Hamiche, Ait Mimoune & Stambouli, Amine Boudghene & Flazi, Samir, 2016. "A review of the water-energy nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 319-331.
    4. Nie, S. & Li, Y.P. & Liu, J. & Huang, Charley Z., 2017. "Risk management of energy system for identifying optimal power mix with financial-cost minimization and environmental-impact mitigation under uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 313-329.
    5. Ozturk, Ilhan, 2015. "Sustainability in the food-energy-water nexus: Evidence from BRICS (Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China, and South Africa) countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 999-1010.
    6. Dubreuil, Aurelie & Assoumou, Edi & Bouckaert, Stephanie & Selosse, Sandrine & Maı¨zi, Nadia, 2013. "Water modeling in an energy optimization framework – The water-scarce middle east context," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 268-279.
    7. Yu, L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2016. "A fuzzy-stochastic simulation-optimization model for planning electric power systems with considering peak-electricity demand: A case study of Qingdao, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 190-203.
    8. Sung-Guk Yoon & Seok-Gu Kang, 2017. "Economic Microgrid Planning Algorithm with Electric Vehicle Charging Demands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Lubega, William N. & Farid, Amro M., 2014. "Quantitative engineering systems modeling and analysis of the energy–water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 142-157.
    10. DeNooyer, Tyler A. & Peschel, Joshua M. & Zhang, Zhenxing & Stillwell, Ashlynn S., 2016. "Integrating water resources and power generation: The energy–water nexus in Illinois," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 363-371.
    11. Nogueira Vilanova, Mateus Ricardo & Perrella Balestieri, José Antônio, 2015. "Exploring the water-energy nexus in Brazil: The electricity use for water supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 415-432.
    12. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Mohammad Rozali, Nor Erniza & Ho, Wai Shin & Abdul-Manan, Zainuddin, 2016. "An MILP model for cost-optimal planning of an on-grid hybrid power system for an eco-industrial park," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1423-1441.
    13. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2016. "Energy–water nexus of wind power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Khan, Zarrar & Linares, Pedro & García-González, Javier, 2017. "Integrating water and energy models for policy driven applications. A review of contemporary work and recommendations for future developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1123-1138.
    15. Yunna Wu & Chao Xie & Chuanbo Xu & Fang Li, 2017. "A Decision Framework for Electric Vehicle Charging Station Site Selection for Residential Communities under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Beijing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Bazilian, Morgan & Rogner, Holger & Howells, Mark & Hermann, Sebastian & Arent, Douglas & Gielen, Dolf & Steduto, Pasquale & Mueller, Alexander & Komor, Paul & Tol, Richard S.J. & Yumkella, Kandeh K., 2011. "Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7896-7906.
    17. Santhosh, Apoorva & Farid, Amro M. & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2014. "Real-time economic dispatch for the supply side of the energy-water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 42-52.
    18. Soares, Murilo Pereira & Street, Alexandre & Valladão, Davi Michel, 2017. "On the solution variability reduction of Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming applied to energy planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 743-760.
    19. Qinliang Tan & Yihong Ding & Yimei Zhang, 2017. "Optimization Model of an Efficient Collaborative Power Dispatching System for Carbon Emissions Trading in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Liu, Lu & Hejazi, Mohamad & Patel, Pralit & Kyle, Page & Davies, Evan & Zhou, Yuyu & Clarke, Leon & Edmonds, James, 2015. "Water demands for electricity generation in the U.S.: Modeling different scenarios for the water–energy nexus," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 318-334.
    21. Dai, C. & Cai, Y.P. & Ren, W. & Xie, Y.F. & Guo, H.C., 2016. "Identification of optimal placements of best management practices through an interval-fuzzy possibilistic programming model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 108-121.
    22. Li, Y.F. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Chen, X., 2010. "Energy and environmental systems planning under uncertainty--An inexact fuzzy-stochastic programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(10), pages 3189-3211, October.
    23. Santhosh, Apoorva & Farid, Amro M. & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2014. "The impact of storage facility capacity and ramping capabilities on the supply side economic dispatch of the energy–water nexus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 363-377.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lv, J. & Li, Y.P. & Shan, B.G. & Jin, S.W. & Suo, C., 2018. "Planning energy-water nexus system under multiple uncertainties – A case study of Hebei province," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 389-403.
    2. Liu, J. & Nie, S. & Shan, B.G. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Liu, Z.P., 2019. "Development of an interval-credibility-chance constrained energy-water nexus system planning model—a case study of Xiamen, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 677-693.
    3. Yu, L. & Xiao, Y. & Jiang, S. & Li, Y.P. & Fan, Y.R. & Huang, G.H. & Lv, J. & Zuo, Q.T. & Wang, F.Q., 2020. "A copula-based fuzzy interval-random programming approach for planning water-energy nexus system under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xiaodong & Vesselinov, Velimir V., 2016. "Energy-water nexus: Balancing the tradeoffs between two-level decision makers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 77-87.
    2. Dai, Jiangyu & Wu, Shiqiang & Han, Guoyi & Weinberg, Josh & Xie, Xinghua & Wu, Xiufeng & Song, Xingqiang & Jia, Benyou & Xue, Wanyun & Yang, Qianqian, 2018. "Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 393-408.
    3. Zhang, Xiaohong & Qi, Yan & Wang, Yanqing & Wu, Jun & Lin, Lili & Peng, Hong & Qi, Hui & Yu, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Yanzong, 2016. "Effect of the tap water supply system on China's economy and energy consumption, and its emissions’ impact," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 660-671.
    4. Duan, Cuncun & Chen, Bin, 2017. "Energy–water nexus of international energy trade of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 725-734.
    5. Wakeel, Muhammad & Chen, Bin & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2016. "Energy consumption for water use cycles in different countries: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 868-885.
    6. Lv, J. & Li, Y.P. & Shan, B.G. & Jin, S.W. & Suo, C., 2018. "Planning energy-water nexus system under multiple uncertainties – A case study of Hebei province," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 389-403.
    7. Guerra, Omar J. & Reklaitis, Gintaras V., 2018. "Advances and challenges in water management within energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4009-4019.
    8. Jin, Yi & Tang, Xu & Feng, Cuiyang & Höök, Mikael, 2017. "Energy and water conservation synergy in China: 2007–2012," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 206-215.
    9. Khan, Zarrar & Linares, Pedro & García-González, Javier, 2017. "Integrating water and energy models for policy driven applications. A review of contemporary work and recommendations for future developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1123-1138.
    10. Nogueira Vilanova, Mateus Ricardo & Perrella Balestieri, José Antônio, 2015. "Exploring the water-energy nexus in Brazil: The electricity use for water supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 415-432.
    11. Logan, Lauren H. & Stillwell, Ashlynn S., 2018. "Probabilistic assessment of aquatic species risk from thermoelectric power plant effluent: Incorporating biology into the energy-water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 434-450.
    12. Muhanji, Steffi Olesi & Barrows, Clayton & Macknick, Jordan & Farid, Amro M., 2021. "An enterprise control assessment case study of the energy–water nexus for the ISO New England system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Khan, Zarrar & Linares, Pedro & Rutten, Martine & Parkinson, Simon & Johnson, Nils & García-González, Javier, 2018. "Spatial and temporal synchronization of water and energy systems: Towards a single integrated optimization model for long-term resource planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 499-517.
    14. Liu, J. & Nie, S. & Shan, B.G. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Liu, Z.P., 2019. "Development of an interval-credibility-chance constrained energy-water nexus system planning model—a case study of Xiamen, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 677-693.
    15. Sandra Venghaus & Carolin Märker & Sophia Dieken & Florian Siekmann, 2019. "Linking Environmental Policy Integration and the Water-Energy-Land-(Food-)Nexus: A Review of the European Union’s Energy, Water, and Agricultural Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Fernández-Blanco, R. & Kavvadias, K. & Hidalgo González, I., 2017. "Quantifying the water-power linkage on hydrothermal power systems: A Greek case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 240-253.
    17. Wu, X.D. & Chen, G.Q., 2017. "Energy and water nexus in power generation: The surprisingly high amount of industrial water use induced by solar power infrastructure in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 125-136.
    18. Bieber, Niclas & Ker, Jen Ho & Wang, Xiaonan & Triantafyllidis, Charalampos & van Dam, Koen H. & Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M. & Shah, Nilay, 2018. "Sustainable planning of the energy-water-food nexus using decision making tools," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 584-607.
    19. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á & Casey, Eoin & Bertsch, Valentin, 2019. "Demand response within the energy-for-water-nexus: A review," Papers WP637, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    20. Zhai, Haibo & Rubin, Edward S. & Grol, Eric J. & O'Connell, Andrew C. & Wu, Zitao & Lewis, Eric G., 2022. "Dry cooling retrofits at existing fossil fuel-fired power plants in a water-stressed region: Tradeoffs in water savings, cost, and capacity shortfalls," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:11:p:1914-:d:119617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.