IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v9y2021i4p154-d656809.html

Moody’s Ratings Statistical Forecasting for Industrial and Retail Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Lorena Caridad y López del Río

    (Department of Statistic, Econometrics, Operational Research, Business Organization and Applied Economics, University of Córdoba, 14002 Córdoba, Spain)

  • María de los Baños García-Moreno García

    (Department of Statistic, Econometrics, Operational Research, Business Organization and Applied Economics, University of Córdoba, 14002 Córdoba, Spain)

  • José Rafael Caro-Barrera

    (Department of Statistic, Econometrics, Operational Research, Business Organization and Applied Economics, University of Córdoba, 14002 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Manuel Adolfo Pérez-Priego

    (Department of Statistic, Econometrics, Operational Research, Business Organization and Applied Economics, University of Córdoba, 14002 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Daniel Caridad y López del Río

    (University Carlos III Spain, 28903 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Long-term ratings of companies are obtained from public data plus some additional nondisclosed information. A model based on data from firms’ public accounts is proposed to directly obtain these ratings, showing fairly close similitude with published results from Credit Rating Agencies. The rating models used to assess the creditworthiness of a firm may involve some possible conflicts of interest, as companies pay for most of the rating process and are, thus, clients of the rating firms. Such loss of faith among investors and criticism toward the rating agencies were especially severe during the financial crisis in 2008. To overcome this issue, several alternatives are addressed; in particular, the focus is on elaborating a rating model for Moody’s long-term companies’ ratings for industrial and retailing firms that could be useful as an external check of published rates. Statistical and artificial intelligence methods are used to obtain direct prediction of awarded rates in these sectors, without aggregating adjacent classes, which is usual in previous literature. This approach achieves an easy-to-replicate methodology for real rating forecasts based only on public available data, without incurring the costs associated with the rating process, while achieving a higher accuracy. With additional sampling information, these models can be extended to other sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorena Caridad y López del Río & María de los Baños García-Moreno García & José Rafael Caro-Barrera & Manuel Adolfo Pérez-Priego & Daniel Caridad y López del Río, 2021. "Moody’s Ratings Statistical Forecasting for Industrial and Retail Firms," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:154-:d:656809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/9/4/154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/9/4/154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doumpos, Michael & Niklis, Dimitrios & Zopounidis, Constantin & Andriosopoulos, Kostas, 2015. "Combining accounting data and a structural model for predicting credit ratings: Empirical evidence from European listed firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 599-607.
    2. Altman, Edward I. & Rijken, Herbert A., 2004. "How rating agencies achieve rating stability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 2679-2714, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goldmann, Leonie & Crook, Jonathan & Calabrese, Raffaella, 2024. "A new ordinal mixed-data sampling model with an application to corporate credit rating levels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 1111-1126.
    2. Yukiko Konno & Yuki Itoh, 2016. "An alternative to the standardized approach for assessing credit risk under the Basel Accords," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1220119-122, December.
    3. Premachandra, I.M. & Bhabra, Gurmeet Singh & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: A comparative study with logistic regression technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 412-424, March.
    4. Hyoung-Joo Lim & Dafydd Mali, 2024. "Does Market Performance (Tobin’s Q) Have A Negative Effect On Credit Ratings? Evidence From South Korea," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 31(1), pages 53-80, March.
    5. Modina, Michele & Pietrovito, Filomena & Gallucci, Carmen & Formisano, Vincenzo, 2023. "Predicting SMEs’ default risk: Evidence from bank-firm relationship data," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 254-268.
    6. Renxiang He & Hongtao Chen & Xiang Zhu, 2025. "Corporate hypocrisy and ESG rating divergence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 1122-1146, January.
    7. Nima Mirzaei & Béla Vizvári, 2015. "A New Approach to Reconstruction of Moody’s Rating System for Countries Investment Risk Rating," Journal of Empirical Economics, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 4(3), pages 167-182.
    8. Alexandr Karminsky & Anatoly Peresetsky, 2009. "Ratings as Measure of Financial Risk: Evolution, Function and Usage," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 1-2, pages 86-102.
    9. Dimitris Andriosopoulos & Michalis Doumpos & Panos M. Pardalos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2019. "Computational approaches and data analytics in financial services: A literature review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(10), pages 1581-1599, October.
    10. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Matousek, Roman & Stewart, Chris, 2012. "Ratings assignments: Lessons from international banks," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1593-1606.
    11. Zhivaikina, A. & Peresetsky, A., 2017. "Russian Bank Credit Ratings and Bank License Withdrawal 2012-2016," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 36(4), pages 49-80.
    12. P. Hammer & A. Kogan & M. Lejeune, 2011. "Reverse-engineering country risk ratings: a combinatorial non-recursive model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 185-213, August.
    13. Lennart Freitag, 2015. "Procyclicality and Path Dependence of Sovereign Credit Ratings: The Example of Europe," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 44(2), pages 309-332, July.
    14. Óscar Arce & Sergio Mayordomo, 2016. "The Impact of the 2011 Short†Sale Ban on Financial Stability: Evidence from the Spanish Stock Market," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 22(5), pages 1001-1022, November.
    15. Shen, Chung-Hua & Huang, Yu-Li & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2012. "Asymmetric benchmarking in bank credit rating," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 171-193.
    16. Gunter Löffler, 2020. "The Systemic Risk Implications of Using Credit Ratings Versus Quantitative Measures to Limit Bond Portfolio Risk," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 58(1), pages 39-57, August.
    17. Loukianova, A. & Smirnova, E., 2015. "Strategic risk-management with the use of market risk indicator: A comparative longitudinal study in the emerging markets," Working Papers 6430, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    18. Lee H. Seltzer & Laura Starks & Qifei Zhu, 2022. "Climate Regulatory Risk and Corporate Bonds," NBER Working Papers 29994, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Abdullah Ash-shu¡¯ayree Al-khawaldeh, 2013. "Determinants and Impacts of Internal Credit Rating," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 120-131, January.
    20. Guanming He, 2021. "Credit rating, post‐earnings‐announcement drift, and arbitrage from transient institutions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(7-8), pages 1434-1467, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:154-:d:656809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.