IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v7y2022i10p139-d942293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Transfer from Nordic Capital Parenting Companies to Lithuanian and Estonian Subsidiaries or Joint Capital Companies: The Analysis of the Obtained Primary Data

Author

Listed:
  • Agnė Šimelytė

    (Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), LT-01223 Vilnius, Lithuania
    General Jonas Zemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, LT-10332 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Manuela Tvaronavičienė

    (Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), LT-01223 Vilnius, Lithuania
    General Jonas Zemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, LT-10332 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Scientific literature describes various factors that influence knowledge transfer and successful adoption, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation. These four components are mostly related to the absorptive capacity of the company. However, more factors influence both developments of innovations or patents and the lack of ability to use external and internal information (knowledge). Using external knowledge is often associated with previous experience, or even a point of view towards investment in innovation or developing patents. Thus, the companies might be divided into innovators and imitators. The research addresses several problems (questions). What external factors are influencing knowledge transfer and further development of innovation? What factors are influencing absorptive capacity? What factors are essential in cooperation and knowledge transfer to switch from a linear to a circular economy? To collect data, a computer-assisted telephone interviewing method was used. The survey was addressed to subsidiaries, joint companies, Lithuanian-Nordic, Estonian-Nordic capital companies, or companies in close collaboration with the Nordic countries. A total of 158 companies from Estonia and Lithuania agreed to answer all the questions. The survey involves companies of various sizes and ages from different business sectors. Reliability was denoted, as Cronbach’s Alpha was estimated. The KMO test was used to measure whether the data were suitable for principal component analysis. Additionally, PCA was performed. PCA reduced the number of variables into an extracted number of components. The separate row of the component defined a linear composite of the component score that would be the expected value of the associated variable. The dataset may be used to develop interlinkages among the research mentioned above questions, and the results of introducing innovation, the company’s size, and age might be used as control variables. The article aims to analyze the factors that determine innovation development and their interlinkages while technology is transferred from Nordic parenting companies to the subsidiaries. The article’s results contribute to the interdisciplinary knowledge transfer, innovations, and internationalization field.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnė Šimelytė & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2022. "Technology Transfer from Nordic Capital Parenting Companies to Lithuanian and Estonian Subsidiaries or Joint Capital Companies: The Analysis of the Obtained Primary Data," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:7:y:2022:i:10:p:139-:d:942293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/7/10/139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/7/10/139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flor, M. Luisa & Cooper, Sarah Y. & Oltra, María J., 2018. "External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 183-194.
    2. José Albors-Garrigos & José L. Hervas-Oliver, 2011. "Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: a forgotten lesson for policymakers," Working Papers. Serie EC 2011-06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    3. Tang, Yingkai & Zhang, Kevin H., 2016. "Absorptive capacity and benefits from FDI: Evidence from Chinese manufactured exports," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 423-429.
    4. Zahler, Andrés & Goya, Daniel & Caamaño, Matías, 2022. "The primacy of demand and financial obstacles in hindering innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Knockaert, Mirjam & Spithoven, André & Clarysse, Bart, 2014. "The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 376-387.
    6. Aija Leiponen & Constance E. Helfat, 2011. "Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 641-658, June.
    7. Nooteboom, Bart & Van Haverbeke, Wim & Duysters, Geert & Gilsing, Victor & van den Oord, Ad, 2007. "Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1016-1034, September.
    8. Olena Vartanova & Olena Kolomytseva & Victoriia Bilyk & Iryna Budnikevich & Lidiia Vasylchenko & Tetiana Burtseva, 2021. "Enterprise competitive positioning based on knowledge resources identification," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(1), pages 529-541, September.
    9. Duong, Phuong-Anh Nguyen & Voordeckers, Wim & Huybrechts, Jolien & Lambrechts, Frank, 2022. "On external knowledge sources and innovation performance: Family versus non-family firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Holmström Lind, Christine & Kang, Olivia & Ljung, Anna & Rosenbaum, Paul, 2022. "Involvement of multinational corporations in social innovation: Exploring an emerging phenomenon," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 207-221.
    11. Cuevas-Vargas, Héctor & Aguirre, Joao & Parga-Montoya, Neftalí, 2022. "Impact of ICT adoption on absorptive capacity and open innovation for greater firm performance. The mediating role of ACAP," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 11-24.
    12. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    13. Rodríguez, Alicia & Hernández, Virginia & Nieto, María Jesús, 2022. "International and domestic external knowledge in the innovation performance of firms from transition economies: The role of institutions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Arūnas Burinskas & Rasmus Bøgh Holmen & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Agnė Šimelytė & Kristina Razminienė, 2021. "FDI, technology & knowledge transfer from Nordic to Baltic countries," Post-Print hal-03583969, HAL.
    15. Davide Antonioli & Davide Antonioli & Elisa Chioatto & Massimiliano Mazzanti, 2022. "Innovations and the circular economy: a national and regional perspective," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(1), pages 57-70, March.
    16. Julius Paulikas & BirutÄ— PaulikienÄ—, 2022. "Impact of the communicated information content on employee resistance to change," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(3), pages 61-75, September.
    17. Merlin-Brogniart, Céline & Fuglsang, Lars & Magnussen, Siv & Peralta, Alberto & Révész, Éva & Rønning, Rolf & Rubalcaba, Luis & Scupola, Ada, 2022. "Social innovation and public service: A literature review of multi-actor collaborative approaches in five European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Cecile Nieuwenhuizen, 2022. "Female social entrepreneurs in Africa creating social value through innovation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(4), pages 225-242, June.
    19. Fursov, Konstantin & Linton, Jonathan, 2022. "Social innovation: Integrating product and user innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Gasparin, Marta & Green, William & Lilley, Simon & Quinn, Martin & Saren, Mike & Schinckus, Christophe, 2021. "Business as unusual: A business model for social innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 698-709.
    21. Barrett, Gillian & Tsekouras, George, 2022. "A tango with a gorilla: An exploration of the microfoundations of open innovation partnerships between young innovative companies and multi-national enterprises," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    22. Rodríguez Fernández-Blanco, Carmen & Górriz-Mifsud, Elena & Prokofieva, Irina & Muys, Bart & Parra, Constanza, 2022. "Blazing the trail: Social innovation supporting wildfire-resilient territories in Catalonia (Spain)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    23. Arza, Valeria & López, Emanuel, 2021. "Obstacles affecting innovation in small and medium enterprises: Quantitative analysis of the Argentinean manufacturing sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    24. Cloodt, Myriam & Hagedoorn, John & Van Kranenburg, Hans, 2006. "Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 642-654, June.
    25. Marta Peris-Ortiz & José-Luis Hervás-Oliver, 2014. "Management Innovation and Technological Innovation: Friends or Foes?," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: José-Luis Hervás-Oliver & Marta Peris-Ortiz (ed.), Management Innovation, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 1-17, Springer.
    26. Dionisio, Marcelo & de Vargas, Eduardo Raupp, 2020. "Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    27. ArÅ«nas Burinskas & ArÅ«nas Burinskas & Rasmus Bøgh Holmen & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ— & AgnÄ— Å imelytÄ— & Kristina RazminienÄ—, 2021. "FDI, technology & knowledge transfer from Nordic to Baltic countries," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(3), pages 31-55, September.
    28. Mirvis, Philip & Herrera, Maria Elena Baltazar & Googins, Bradley & Albareda, Laura, 2016. "Corporate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5014-5021.
    29. Ritter-Hayashi, Daniela & Knoben, Joris & Vermeulen, Patrick A.M., 2021. "Temporary employment: Curse or blessing for a firm's absorptive capacity?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    30. Eugine Tafadzwa Maziriri & Miston Mapuranga & Tafadzwa Clementine Maramura & Ogochukwu I. Nzewi, 2019. "Navigating on the key drivers for a transition to a green economy: evidence from women entrepreneurs in South Africa," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1686-1703, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asimakopoulos, Grigorios & Revilla, Antonio & Rodríguez, Alicia, 2023. "International R&D sourcing, innovation and firm age: The advantage of ‘born-international sourcers’," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Lu, Xiaowei & Wang, Jiexiang, 2024. "Is innovation strategy a catalyst to solve social problems? The impact of R&D and non-R&D innovation strategies on the performance of social innovation-oriented firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Saka-Helmhout, Ayse & Álamos-Concha, Priscilla & López, Mabel Machado & Hagan, Julie & Murray, Gregor & Edwards, Tony & Kern, Philipp & Martin, Isabelle & Zhang, Ling Eleanor, 2024. "Stakeholder engagement strategies for impactful corporate social innovation initiatives by multinational enterprises," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    4. Dian Prihadyanti & Subkhi Abdul Aziz & Karlina Sari, 2024. "Diffusion of Social Innovation: the Innovation Provider’s Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4516-4570, March.
    5. Avimanyu Datta, 2016. "Antecedents To Radical Innovations: A Longitudinal Look At Firms In The Information Technology Industry By Aggregation Of Patents," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-31, October.
    6. Jacob, Jojo & Belderbos, René & Lokshin, Boris, 2023. "Entangled modes: Boundaries to effective international knowledge sourcing through technology alliances and technology-based acquisitions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Héctor Cuevas-Vargas & Héctor Abraham Cortés-Palacios & Cid Leana-Morales & Eduardo Huerta-Mascotte, 2022. "Absorptive Capacity and Its Dual Effect on Technological Innovation: A Structural Equations Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Roberto Alvarez & Miguel A. Gonzalez, 2023. "Obstacles to Green Innovation: Evidence from Chilean Firms," Working Papers wp550, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    9. Villani, Elisa & Rasmussen, Einar & Grimaldi, Rosa, 2017. "How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 86-102.
    10. Zeeshan Ullah & Ahmad Arslan & Vesa Puhakka, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility strategy, sustainable product attributes, and export performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1840-1853, November.
    11. Ayse Saka-Helmhout & Maryse M. H. Chappin & Suzana B. Rodrigues, 2022. "Corporate Social Innovation in Developing Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 589-605, December.
    12. Nazari, Mohsen, 2022. "The journey from Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Innovation: The Whys and the Hows," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 2(2), pages 27-39.
    13. Nan Wang & Baolian Chen & Liya Wang & Zhenzhong Ma & Shan Pan, 2024. "Big data analytics capability and social innovation: the mediating role of knowledge exploration and exploitation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Cuesta-Valiño, Pedro & Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, Pablo & Núnez-Barriopedro, Estela & García-Henche, Blanca, 2023. "Strategic orientation towards digitization to improve supermarket loyalty in an omnichannel context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara DiGuardo, 2017. "Sustainability of patent-based competitive advantage in the U.S. communications services industry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1334-1361, December.
    16. Claudia Bitencourt & Gabriela Zanandrea & Cristiane Froehlich & Manuela Rösing Agostini & Roselei Haag, 2024. "Rethinking the company's role: Creating shared value from corporate social innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2865-2877, July.
    17. Lau, Antonio K.W. & Lo, William, 2015. "Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 99-114.
    18. Shufeng Xiao & Taewoo Roh & Pervez N. Ghauri & Moon Hwan Cho & Byung Il Park, 2024. "MNCs’ Social Innovation in Emerging Markets: A Stakeholder Perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 633-670, August.
    19. Sergio Cuéllar & Maria Teresa Fernandez-Bajón & Felix Moya Anegón, 2024. "A New Approach to Measure Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability: a Case of Study in Emerging Markets," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15418-15446, September.
    20. Shafique, Muhammad & Hagedoorn, John, 2022. "Look at U: Technological scope of the acquirer, technological complementarity with the target, and post-acquisition R&D output," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:7:y:2022:i:10:p:139-:d:942293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.