IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v12y2021i1p13-d554556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SMARTIES Project: The Survey of Needs for Municipalities and Trainers for Smart Cities

Author

Listed:
  • George Xydis

    (Department of Business Development and Technology, Centre for Energy Technologies, Aarhus University, Birk Centerpark 15, 7400 Herning, Denmark)

  • Luca Pagliaricci

    (European Grants International Academy Srl, Via Delle Industrie 9, 06034 Foligno, Italy)

  • Živilė Paužaitė

    (Kaunas Science and Technology Park, K.Petrausko g. 26, LT-44156 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Vygintas Grinis

    (Kaunas Science and Technology Park, K.Petrausko g. 26, LT-44156 Kaunas, Lithuania
    The author Vygintas Grinis has Changed to a New Affiliation since 11 January 2021: Center for Hydrogen Energy Technologies, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos st. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania.)

  • Gyula Sallai

    (Federated Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Muegyetem Rakpart 3, 1111 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Peter Bakonyi

    (Federated Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Muegyetem Rakpart 3, 1111 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Radoslav Vician

    (E-CODE, Slnecna 11647, 96301 Krupina, Slovakia)

Abstract

In an aim to contribute to already existing knowledge upon the subject of smart cities and the public sector’s wider knowledge in Europe, this study investigates the perception by the municipalities and the wider public sector, responsible for implementing smart solutions in the environment. The understanding of the concept of smart cities/villages by municipalities is on a low level due to the fact that the problem is too wide, not well described, solutions even wider, accompanied by the lack of experts able to offer comprehensive solutions to municipalities. The study presents factors according to the current municipalities’ knowledge (environmental awareness, knowledge and prior experience) and the existing market, of whether these factors can be said that affect the acceptance of smart cities. The public is already aware of the smart cities as a general concept, however, the study sheds light upon the established knowledge that the decision makers have in five countries, Hungary, Slovakia, Italy, Lithuania, and Denmark.

Suggested Citation

  • George Xydis & Luca Pagliaricci & Živilė Paužaitė & Vygintas Grinis & Gyula Sallai & Peter Bakonyi & Radoslav Vician, 2021. "SMARTIES Project: The Survey of Needs for Municipalities and Trainers for Smart Cities," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:13-:d:554556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/12/1/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/12/1/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paskaleva, Krassimira & Cooper, Ian, 2018. "Open innovation and the evaluation of internet-enabled public services in smart cities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 4-14.
    2. Anastasia Stratigea & Chrysaida-Aliki Papadopoulou & Maria Panagiotopoulou, 2015. "Tools and Technologies for Planning the Development of Smart Cities," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 43-62, April.
    3. André Luis Azevedo Guedes & Jeferson Carvalho Alvarenga & Maurício Dos Santos Sgarbi Goulart & Martius Vicente Rodriguez y Rodriguez & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2018. "Smart Cities: The Main Drivers for Increasing the Intelligence of Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Nanaki, E.A. & Koroneos, C.J. & Xydis, G.A. & Rovas, D., 2014. "Comparative environmental assessment of Athens urban buses—Diesel, CNG and biofuel powered," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 311-318.
    5. William Hatcher & Wesley L. Meares & John Heslen, 2020. "The cybersecurity of municipalities in the United States: an exploratory survey of policies and practices," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 302-325, May.
    6. Saptarshi Das & Ashok Sekar & Roger Chen & Hyung Chul Kim & Timothy J. Wallington & Eric Williams, 2017. "Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles on Consumers Time-Use Patterns," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Xydis, George A. & Nanaki, Evanthia A. & Koroneos, Christopher J., 2013. "Low-enthalpy geothermal resources for electricity production: A demand-side management study for intelligent communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 118-123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Maria Papoui-Evangelou & Bogdana Nosova & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Smart ‘Tourist Cities’ Revisited: Culture-Led Urban Sustainability and the Global Real Estate Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Secinaro, Silvana & Brescia, Valerio & Lanzalonga, Federico & Santoro, Gabriele, 2022. "Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    2. Fromhold-Eisebith, Martina & Eisebith, Günter, 2019. "What can Smart City policies in emerging economies actually achieve? Conceptual considerations and empirical insights from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Mora, Luca & Gerli, Paolo & Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2023. "Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    4. Lill Sarv & Ralf-Martin Soe, 2021. "Transition towards Smart City: The Case of Tallinn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Cai, Meng & Kotval-Karamchandani, Zeenat & Decaminada, Travis, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles and mobility for people with special needs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 385-397.
    6. Zhang, Tao & Li, Yiteng & Chen, Yin & Feng, Xiaoyu & Zhu, Xingyu & Chen, Zhangxing & Yao, Jun & Zheng, Yongchun & Cai, Jianchao & Song, Hongqing & Sun, Shuyu, 2021. "Review on space energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Santamarta, Juan C. & García-Gil, Alejandro & Expósito, María del Cristo & Casañas, Elías & Cruz-Pérez, Noelia & Rodríguez-Martín, Jesica & Mejías-Moreno, Miguel & Götzl, Gregor & Gemeni, Vasiliki, 2021. "The clean energy transition of heating and cooling in touristic infrastructures using shallow geothermal energy in the Canary Islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 505-515.
    9. Zamparini, Luca & Vergori, Anna Serena, 2021. "Sustainable mobility at tourist destinations: The relevance of habits and the role of policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Heidrich, Oliver, 2019. "Emissions from urban bus fleets running on biodiesel blends under real-world operating conditions: Implications for designing future case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 276-292.
    11. Justyna Żywiołek & Francesco Schiavone, 2021. "Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Konstantinos Kourtzanidis & Komninos Angelakoglou & Vasilis Apostolopoulos & Paraskevi Giourka & Nikolaos Nikolopoulos, 2021. "Assessing Impact, Performance and Sustainability Potential of Smart City Projects: Towards a Case Agnostic Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-38, July.
    13. Ioan RADU & Alexandra Irina PÃDUREAN (BADEA) & Mihai Ludovic DEMETER & Daniel ALEXANDRU, 2019. "Smart City Evolution, From Early Concept To International Standards. Small Vs. Big Cities Study Case," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 521-534, November.
    14. Aldona Fraczkiewicz-Wronka & Anna Kozak, 2021. "Facilitating Co-production in Health Promotion: Study of Senior Councils in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 182-201.
    15. Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Patrick Witte, 2020. "Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1343-1360, October.
    16. Nimesha Sahani Jayasena & Daniel W. M. Chan & Mohan M. Kumaraswamy, 2022. "Is Public–Private Partnership (PPP) a Preferred Strategy for Procuring Smart Infrastructure in Developed Countries: An Empirical Study of the Perceived Benefits, Barriers and Recommended Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Marcos Lima, 2020. "Smarter organizations: insights from a smart city hybrid framework," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1281-1300, December.
    18. De Clercq, Djavan & Wen, Zongguo & Fan, Fei & Caicedo, Luis, 2016. "Biomethane production potential from restaurant food waste in megacities and project level-bottlenecks: A case study in Beijing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1676-1685.
    19. Pudāne, Baiba, 2019. "Departure Time Choice and Bottleneck Congestion with Automated Vehicles: Role of On-board Activities," MPRA Paper 96328, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Gaurav Vyas & Pooneh Famili & Peter Vovsha & Daniel Fay & Ashish Kulshrestha & Greg Giaimo & Rebekah Anderson, 2019. "Incorporating features of autonomous vehicles in activity-based travel demand model for Columbus, OH," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2081-2102, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:13-:d:554556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.