IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i12p1316-d1682760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongping Wang

    (Economics and Management School of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiaoying Tian

    (Economics and Management School of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

This study analyses the impact of agricultural greenwashing on financial performance via green innovation. To this end, it employs data from Chinese A-share agribusinesses from 2012 to 2022. The study indicates the following results: (1) the practice of greenwashing (ESG disclosure–performance gap, GW) has a significant negative impact on ROA, particularly in non-state firms; (2) green innovation (patents, GI) partially mediates this relationship, with a percentage of 9.09%, as GW diverts research and development resources toward image management. Robustness checks are employed to confirm the results obtained using ROE and lagged models. Property rights moderate the effects: non-state firms are more adversely affected by innovation dependency, while state firms are protected by policies. The “double-edged” mechanism elucidates GW’s short-term legitimacy gains in contrast to long-term innovation suppression and financial decline. The report calls for the establishment of standardised ESG metrics (for example, the disclosure of pesticide residue) and targeted green incentives (for example, SME R&D subsidies) to be aligned with UN SDGs 9.4 (green tech) and 12.6 (responsible production). The present study offers insights into the governance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters within the context of agriculture in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongping Wang & Xiaoying Tian, 2025. "From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:1316-:d:1682760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1316/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1316/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:1316-:d:1682760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.