IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i12p2042-d987475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the High-Quality County-Level Development and Governance Response for Farming–Pastoral Ecotone in China: A Case Study of Kulun

Author

Listed:
  • Zhe Cheng

    (School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Anni Tang

    (School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Jianming Cai

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Tao Song

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

As a special territory type, the farming–pastoral ecotone is facing challenges surrounding path creation and high-quality and sustainable development. Counties are not only an important spatial unit to promote high-quality development, but also an important part of the modernization of the national governance system. County-level development is the critical driving force of sustainable development and the breakthrough of governance modernization in the farming-pastoral ecotone. First, this study systematically reviews the progress of the farming–pastoral ecotone and high-quality development. Then, this study adopts the “Driving Forces-Pressure-State-Impact-Responses” (DPSIR) model and entropy method to construct an analysis framework. Third, taking Kulun county as a typical case, this study diagnoses the state of high-quality county-level development in the farming–pastoral ecotone. Finally, a governance mechanism of “idea-space-industry-people’s livelihood-governance” has been proposed. This study provides theoretical guidance for the high-quality development of the farming–pastoral ecotone and enriches the body of knowledge regarding high-quality development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhe Cheng & Anni Tang & Jianming Cai & Tao Song, 2022. "Exploring the High-Quality County-Level Development and Governance Response for Farming–Pastoral Ecotone in China: A Case Study of Kulun," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2042-:d:987475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Burdon, Daryl & Elliott, Michael, 2013. "A problem structuring method for ecosystem-based management: The DPSIR modelling process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 558-569.
    2. Shaolong Zeng & Xianfan Shu & Wenxian Ye, 2022. "Total Factor Productivity and High-Quality Economic Development: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Zhen Liu, 2022. "Rural Population Decline, Cultivated Land Expansion, and the Role of Land Transfers in the Farming-Pastoral Ecotone: A Case Study of Taibus, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Yan Xue & Caidong Jiang & Yunxia Guo & Jianmin Liu & Haitao Wu & Yu Hao, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and High-quality Development: Do Green Innovation, Environmental Investment and Corporate Governance Matter?," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(11), pages 3191-3214, September.
    5. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H. & O'Connor, Martin, 2009. "An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 12-23, November.
    6. Jianguo Du & Jing Zhang & Xingwei Li, 2020. "What Is the Mechanism of Resource Dependence and High-Quality Economic Development? An Empirical Test from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Shi, Wenjiao & Liu, Yiting & Shi, Xiaoli, 2018. "Contributions of climate change to the boundary shifts in the farming-pastoral ecotone in northern China since 1970," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 16-27.
    8. Xuanzhi Yang & Zhaofang Zhang & Wei Luo & Zhen Tang & Xin Gao & Zhongchi Wan & Xin Zhang, 2019. "The Impact of Government Role on High-Quality Innovation Development in Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Wang, Fang & He, Hao & Dong, Ying & Xiong, Wei & Zhu, Xiaohua & He, Jing, 2018. "Shaping or being shaped? Analysis of the locality of landscapes in China’s farming-pastoral ecotone, considering the effects of land use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-52.
    10. Qionghuan Liu & Xiuhong Wang & Yili Zhang & Huamin Zhang & Lanhui Li, 2019. "Vegetation Degradation and Its Driving Factors in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone over the Countries along Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Tan, Sieting & Yang, Jin & Yan, Jinyue & Lee, Chewtin & Hashim, Haslenda & Chen, Bin, 2017. "A holistic low carbon city indicator framework for sustainable development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1919-1930.
    12. Yu, Danlin & Zhang, Yaojun & Wu, Xiwei & Li, Ding & Li, Guangdong, 2021. "The varying effects of accessing high-speed rail system on China’s county development: A geographically weighted panel regression analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhongwu Zhang & Jinyuan Zhang & Liping Liu & Jian Gong & Jinqiang Li & Lei Kang, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Heterogeneity of Urbanization and Ecosystem Services in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kun Chen & Yinrong Chen & Min Liu & Yi Chen, 2023. "Research on the Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Influence Path of High-Quality Economic Development from the Perspective of Urban Land Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Wenyan Pan & Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Waseem Hassan, 2020. "Synthetic Evaluation of China’s Regional Low-Carbon Economy Challenges by Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Song Wang & Caizhi Sun & Xin Li & Wei Zou, 2016. "Sustainable Development in China’s Coastal Area: Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Welfare-Response Framework and the Data Envelopment Analysis Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Stella Apostolaki & Phoebe Koundouri & Nikitas Pittis, 2019. "Using a systemic approach to address the requirement for Integrated Water Resource Management within the Water Framework Directive," DEOS Working Papers 1910, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    5. Cheng He & Liguo Zhou & Weichun Ma & Yuan Wang, 2019. "Spatial Assessment of Urban Climate Change Vulnerability during Different Urbanization Phases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Xiaochi Qu & Haozhe Zhang & Guohua Bi & Kangchuan Su & Zhongxun Zhang & Yao Qian & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Spatial Effects of the Land Supply Scale of Different Industrial Sectors on High-Quality Development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Guillaume Lhermie, 2021. "Shaping Agricultural Policies in the Anthropocene Era: What Can We Learn from the DPSIR Framework?," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(25), October.
    8. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    9. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Tianjiao Zhao & Xiang Xiao & Qinghui Dai, 2021. "Transportation Infrastructure Construction and High-Quality Development of Enterprises: Evidence from the Quasi-Natural Experiment of High-Speed Railway Opening in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    12. Hongwei Liu & Ronglu Yang & Zhixiang Zhou & Dacheng Huang, 2020. "Regional Green Eco-Efficiency in China: Considering Energy Saving, Pollution Treatment, and External Environmental Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Du, Xiaoyun & Meng, Conghui & Guo, Zhenhua & Yan, Hang, 2023. "An improved approach for measuring the efficiency of low carbon city practice in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Lin, Boqiang & Zhu, Junpeng, 2019. "Impact of energy saving and emission reduction policy on urban sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 12-22.
    15. Guorong Chen & Changyan Liu, 2023. "Can Low–Carbon City Development Stimulate Population Growth? Insights from China’s Low–Carbon Pilot Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Shuting Bai & Jiuchun Yang & Yubo Zhang & Fengqin Yan & Lingxue Yu & Shuwen Zhang, 2022. "Evaluating Ecosystem Services and Trade-Offs Based on Land-Use Simulation: A Case Study in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Kim, Yeon-Su & Rodrigues, Marcos & Robinne, François-Nicolas, 2021. "Economic drivers of global fire activity: A critical review using the DPSIR framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Hongtao Jiang & Jian Yin & Yuanhong Qiu & Bin Zhang & Yi Ding & Ruici Xia, 2022. "Industrial Carbon Emission Efficiency of Cities in the Pearl River Basin: Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Longyu Shi & Xueqin Xiang & Wei Zhu & Lijie Gao, 2018. "Standardization of the Evaluation Index System for Low-Carbon Cities in China: A Case Study of Xiamen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Zhuoxi Yu & Yu Wu & Zhichuan Zhu, 2023. "Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2042-:d:987475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.