IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v74y2018icp41-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shaping or being shaped? Analysis of the locality of landscapes in China’s farming-pastoral ecotone, considering the effects of land use

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Fang
  • He, Hao
  • Dong, Ying
  • Xiong, Wei
  • Zhu, Xiaohua
  • He, Jing

Abstract

Due to the evolutionary process and cultural context, landscapes in different regions have relevance and heterogeneity. Hence, it is necessary to understand the landscape systematically from a macro perspective. Urbanization in China involves strong land-use policy-making, which further shapes the natural and cultural landscapes of a region. It is constructive to discern the interplay between the landscape and the related land-use policies by examining changes and variations in the regional and trans-regional landscape based on locality. China’s farming-pastoral ecotone is one such region that covers a large area of 15 provincial administrative units, representing diverse forms of land use and landscape combinations. Using a comprehensive, real-time user-generated content dataset, as well as software programs, including Matlab, ArcGIS, NVivo and Octopus Collector, 27,613 photographs were coded, translated, combined, reconstructed and analyzed via spatial and content analysis. The primary conclusions are as follows. Locality elements in the farming-pastoral ecotone include nine types of dendriform nodes containing 52 free nodes, showing that the heterogeneity of the landscape is relatively high and that locality elements are abundant. After comparing the spatial distributions of diverse landscape elements, we determined that most elements related to natural landscape are located in the southern section, which presents a mostly pure locality, while elements of cultural landscape are primarily distributed across the central and northern sections, which show a type of constructed locality. The pure-constructed locality differentiation patterns coincide with policies in the south and north, which differ in terms of elasticity and rigidity. This study’s results indicate that for better or for worse, strong policies can interfere with locality development.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Fang & He, Hao & Dong, Ying & Xiong, Wei & Zhu, Xiaohua & He, Jing, 2018. "Shaping or being shaped? Analysis of the locality of landscapes in China’s farming-pastoral ecotone, considering the effects of land use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:74:y:2018:i:c:p:41-52
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717300431
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhe Cheng & Anni Tang & Jianming Cai & Tao Song, 2022. "Exploring the High-Quality County-Level Development and Governance Response for Farming–Pastoral Ecotone in China: A Case Study of Kulun," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:74:y:2018:i:c:p:41-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.