IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v9y2019i1p12-d202623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Relational Approach to Leadership for Multi-Actor Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Craps

    (Centre for Corporate Sustainability, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Cycloop, Network for Action Research on Multi-actor Collaboration, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium)

  • Inge Vermeesch

    (Centre for Corporate Sustainability, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Art Dewulf

    (Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
    Cycloop, Network for Action Research on Multi-actor Collaboration, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium)

  • Koen Sips

    (Point Consulting Group, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium
    Cycloop, Network for Action Research on Multi-actor Collaboration, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium)

  • Katrien Termeer

    (Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • René Bouwen

    (Centre for Organizational Psychology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

Multi-actor governance, in which a broad mix of actors collaborates to deal with complex societal problems, requires a leadership approach that can take into account the dynamic interdependencies between the involved actors. A relational approach to leadership, focusing on processes and practices, is more adequate for that purpose than approaches focusing on individuals and positions. Complexity leadership theory offers such a relational approach to leadership within organizations. In this article, we use complexity leadership theory to capture the emergent leadership processes between organizations. We focus on the characteristics of the informal relations between representatives of different organizations that enable dealing with the often-conflicting goals and values in multi-actor governance. The case of a landfill mining initiative for sustainable materials governance is used as an illustration to clarify the main concepts and arguments.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Craps & Inge Vermeesch & Art Dewulf & Koen Sips & Katrien Termeer & René Bouwen, 2019. "A Relational Approach to Leadership for Multi-Actor Governance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:12-:d:202623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/1/12/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/1/12/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen P. Osborne, 2006. "The New Public Governance?-super-1," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 377-387, September.
    2. Sibout G. Nooteboom & Catrien J.A.M. Termeer, 2013. "Strategies of Complexity Leadership in Governance Systems," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 25-40, April.
    3. Crevani, Lucia & Lindgren, Monica & Packendorff, Johann, 2010. "Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 77-86, March.
    4. Hilary Bradbury & Benyamin M. Bergmann Lichtenstein, 2000. "Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 551-564, October.
    5. Raelin, Joseph A., 2011. "From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 195-211.
    6. Johnson, Hazel & Wilson, Gordon, 2000. "Biting the Bullet: Civil Society, Social Learning and the Transformation of Local Governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 1891-1906, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murale Venugopalan & Bettina Lynda Bastian & P. K. Viswanathan, 2021. "The Role of Multi-Actor Engagement for Women’s Empowerment and Entrepreneurship in Kerala, India," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Santos, Íris & Pekkola, Elias, 2023. "Policy entrepreneurs in the global education complex: The case of Finnish education experts working in international organisations," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Clara Medina-García & Rosa de la Fuente & Pieter Van den Broeck, 2021. "Exploring the Emergence of Innovative Multi-Actor Collaborations toward a Progressive Urban Regime in Madrid (2015–2019)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Sandra Schruijer, 2020. "The Dynamics of Interorganizational Collaborative Relationships: Introduction," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-9, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lehtonen, Salla & Seeck, Hannele, 2022. "Multilevel and multisite leadership development from a leadership-as-practice perspective: an integrative literature review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118462, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Perttu Salovaara, 2015. "What can the coworking movement tell us about the future of workplaces?," Chapters, in: Leadership in Spaces and Places, chapter 1, pages 27-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Sorin-George Toma & Ștefan Catană & Cătălin Grădinaru, 2020. "Leadership an overview," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 32(1), pages 51-59, December.
    4. Aleksandra Maksimovska & Aleksandar Stojkov, 2019. "Composite Indicator of Social Responsiveness of Local Governments: An Empirical Mapping of the Networked Community Governance Paradigm," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 669-706, July.
    5. Olga I. Timofeeva, 2022. "Methodology and Results of Measuring the Transparency of Russian Regional Budgets," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 44-58, December.
    6. Akram Hatami & Jan Hermes & Anne Keränen & Pauliina Ulkuniemi, 2023. "Creating Social Sustainability Through Distributing Leadership and Co-Responsibility in Corporate Volunteering," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(1), pages 81-96, April.
    7. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2015. "Vers des écosystèmes de services gérontologiques ?," Post-Print hal-01164391, HAL.
    8. Laura Carmouze & Christophe Alaux & Fouchet Robert, 2021. "Co-construire les services publics locaux : une approche stratégique de la participation des parties prenantes externes. Cas de l’analyse des besoins sociaux dans des centres communaux d’action social," Post-Print hal-04188705, HAL.
    9. Nicola Mario Iacovino & Sara Barsanti & Lino Cinquini, 2017. "Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: the Case of the Tuscany Region," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 61-82, March.
    10. Lalin Anik & Lara B Aknin & Michael I Norton & Elizabeth W Dunn & Jordi Quoidbach, 2013. "Prosocial Bonuses Increase Employee Satisfaction and Team Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    11. Dimitriadis, Nikolaos & Psychogios, Alexandros, 2020. "Social Brain-Constructed Relational Leadership:A Neuroscience View of the Leader-Follower Duality," CAFE Working Papers 1, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    12. Yuka Fujimoto & Jasim Uddin, 2022. "Inclusive Leadership for Reduced Inequality: Economic–Social–Economic Cycle of Inclusion," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 563-582, December.
    13. Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo & Guccio, Calogero & Rizzo, Ilde, 2023. "How "one-size-fits-all" public works contract does it better? An assessment of infrastructure provision in Italy," EconStor Preprints 270729, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. ter Bogt, Henk & Tillema, Sandra, 2016. "Accounting for trust and control: Public sector partnerships in the arts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 5-23.
    15. Mihajla Gavin & Scott Fitzgerald & Susan McGrath-Champ, 2022. "From marketising to empowering: Evaluating union responses to devolutionary policies in education," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 80-99, March.
    16. Yuriy V. Belousov, 2022. "Transparent Budget in the System of Public Administration," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 79-91, August.
    17. Suze Wilson & Hugh Lee & Jackie Ford & Nancy Harding, 2021. "On the Ethics of Psychometric Instruments Used in Leadership Development Programmes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 211-227, August.
    18. Nunkoo, Robin & Smith, Stephen L.J., 2013. "Political economy of tourism: Trust in government actors, political support, and their determinants," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 120-132.
    19. Christopher Kummelstedt, 2023. "The Role of Hierarchy in Realizing Collective Leadership in a Self-Managing Organization," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 355-375, June.
    20. Diederik de Boer & Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2016. "Success Factors for Community Business Wildlife Tourism Partnerships in Tanzania," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(4), pages 555-570, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:12-:d:202623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.