IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i5p158-d1642189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Effects of Economic Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization on the Export Performance of Ethiopian Privatized Manufacturing Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Ahmed Endris

    (Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch P.O. Box 21, Ethiopia)

  • Abebe Ejigu Alemu

    (Department of Logistics and Transport Management, International Maritime College Oman, National University of Science and Technology, Sohar P.O. Box 532, Oman)

  • Abiot Tsegaye Kibret

    (Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch P.O. Box 21, Ethiopia)

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic effect of economic liberalization, privatization, and globalization on the export performance of Ethiopian manufacturing firms. We use structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the direct and indirect influences between these macroeconomic reforms and export performance, which are mediated by firms’ competitive priorities in the global market, using cross-sectional data from 114 manufacturing privatized manufacturing firms by using key informant techniques. The study looks into how firms’ export competitiveness and export performance are affected by economic liberalization, privatization, and global market integration since 1991 national economic reform. This model identified liberalization, privatization, and globalization as independent variables that mediated export performance under competitive priority. The findings of the proposed framework showed that all of the predictive variables (LPG) were significant at p < 0.05, indicating that liberalization, privatization, and economic globalization influence export performance across all competitive priorities. The result further revealed that by expanding access to international markets and promoting competitive efficiency, economic globalization/integration, privatization incentives, and economic liberalization changes all significantly improve export performance. The results also infer that LPG provides an intervening role in boosting export performance under firms’ competitive priorities (cost, flexibility, and quality). However, resolving issues, including inefficient regulations and inconsistent incentives, is important to realize these advantages. To optimize the advantages of these dynamics, policymakers must concentrate on establishing a business environment that encourages firms to partake in export, innovation, and competition. The study contributes to the literature by offering sector-specific insights for policymakers aiming to optimize privatization strategies and trade reforms to boost Ethiopia’s manufacturing exports. The results underscore the need for targeted policy interventions to mitigate short-term disruptions while maximizing long-term export gains in a liberalized economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Ahmed Endris & Abebe Ejigu Alemu & Abiot Tsegaye Kibret, 2025. "Dynamic Effects of Economic Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization on the Export Performance of Ethiopian Privatized Manufacturing Firms," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:158-:d:1642189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/5/158/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/5/158/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. ALAN WINTERS & NEIL McCULLOCH & ANDREW McKAY, 2015. "Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence So Far," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Non-Tariff Barriers, Regionalism and Poverty Essays in Applied International Trade Analysis, chapter 14, pages 271-314, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    3. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josh Lerner & Joacim Tåg, 2013. "Institutions and venture capital," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(1), pages 153-182, February.
    2. Fryges, Helmut & Kohn, Karsten & Ullrich, Katrin, 2011. "The Interdependence of R&D Activity and Debt Financing of Young Firms," IZA Discussion Papers 6217, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Samuel Orekoya, Phd, . "Impact Of Mobile Money On Prices And Output In Nigeria," Journal of Economic and Sustainable Growth 1, Office Of The Chief Economist, Development Bank of Nigeria.
    4. A. Ashwin & Rishikesha Krishnan & Rejie George, 2015. "Family firms in India: family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 869-900, December.
    5. Kuzman Tanja & Bellos Sotirios K. & Đulić Katarina, 2018. "Determinants of Innovation-based Sustainability in Transition and Developing Economies," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(3), pages 413-438, September.
    6. Russell Smyth & Dic Lo, 2000. "Theories of the Firm and the Relationship between Different Perspectives on the Division of Labour," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 333-349.
    7. Murat Alp Celik & Xu Tian, 2023. "Agency Frictions, Managerial Compensation, and Disruptive Innovations," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 16-38, December.
    8. Bettina Peters, 2009. "Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 226-243, April.
    9. Zhang, Haiyan & Lu, Fangwen & Wang, Dehua, 2024. "Delayed tax rebates, cash flow, and corporate spending: A quasi-experiment from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Ha-Joon Chang & Ali Cheema & L. Mises, 2002. "Conditions For Successful Technology Policy In Developing Countries—Learning Rents, State Structures, And Institutions," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4-5), pages 369-398.
    11. Forssbaeck, Jens & Oxel, Lars, 2014. "The Multi-Faceted Concept of Transparency," Working Paper Series 1013, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    12. Castelnovo, Paolo, 2022. "Innovation in private and state-owned enterprises: A cross-industry analysis of patenting activity," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 98-113.
    13. Xiao, Gang, 2013. "Legal shareholder protection and corporate R&D investment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 240-266.
    14. Ross Levine & Yona Rubinstein, 2017. "Smart and Illicit: Who Becomes an Entrepreneur and Do They Earn More?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(2), pages 963-1018.
    15. Hyuna Kim & Sun-Young Park, 2012. "The Relation between Cash Holdings and R&D Expenditures According to Ownership Structure," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 2(2), pages 25-42, December.
    16. Dalila Nicet-Chenaf, 2012. "Model of financial development: a cluster analysis," Post-Print hal-00798462, HAL.
    17. Bernard Paulré, 2001. "Enjeux et dilemmes de l'économie cognitive," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00135486, HAL.
    18. Wen Chen & Yufeng Zhu & Chenyu Wang, 2023. "Executives' overseas background and corporate green innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 165-179, January.
    19. Szarzec, Katarzyna & Dombi, Ákos & Matuszak, Piotr, 2021. "State-owned enterprises and economic growth: Evidence from the post-Lehman period," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Ross Levine & Yona Rubinstein, 2013. "Smart and Illicit: Who Becomes an Entrepreneur and Does it Pay?," CEP Discussion Papers dp1237, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:158-:d:1642189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.