IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i2p45-d1584022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology-Enabled Learning for Green and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Education

Author

Listed:
  • Adina Cocu

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

  • Emilia Pecheanu

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

  • Ioan Susnea

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

  • Sandra Dingli

    (The Edward de Bono Institute for Creative Thinking and Innovation, University of Malta, 2080 Msida, Malta)

  • Adrian Istrate

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

  • Cornelia Tudorie

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

Abstract

(1) Background and objectives: Global crises such as climate change, pandemics, and resource depletion present unprecedented challenges that require coordinated and innovative responses. This study advocates for a bottom-up strategy by proposing and developing tools that empower individuals and organizations to embrace green and sustainable entrepreneurship, fostering localized solutions with global impact. In this context, the research explored the integration of technology-enabled entrepreneurship education (EE) into engineering curricula, with a focus on sustainable and green entrepreneurship. Leveraging insights from European projects, the research developed a cloud-based entrepreneurship educational system featuring three e-learning platforms. Particularly, one e-learning platform was specifically designed to support green and sustainable entrepreneurship education. (2) Methods: the study involved literature reviews, stakeholder surveys, interviews with green entrepreneurs, and iterative platform design. (3) Results: Key outcomes of the research include a methodology for designing pedagogical strategies and learning content for green and sustainable EE. Additionally, digital tools such as the green business innovation canvas, TRIZ-inspired matrices, and AI-driven recommendation systems were created to equip learners with the skills to develop sustainable business models. (4) Originality: The study’s novelty lies in its integration of advanced digital tools with original pedagogical strategies, providing a scalable framework for incorporating sustainability into entrepreneurship education. These findings have practical implications for educators and policymakers working to promote eco-friendly business practices. Future research should investigate the scalability of these tools across diverse educational contexts and evaluate their long-term impact on fostering sustainable entrepreneurial mindsets.

Suggested Citation

  • Adina Cocu & Emilia Pecheanu & Ioan Susnea & Sandra Dingli & Adrian Istrate & Cornelia Tudorie, 2025. "Technology-Enabled Learning for Green and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Education," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:45-:d:1584022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/2/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/2/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    2. Katz, Jerome A., 2003. "The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876-1999," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 283-300, March.
    3. Lythreatis, Sophie & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2022. "The digital divide: A review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    5. Sichu Liu & Hongyi Sun & Jiahao Zhuang & Rui Xiong, 2023. "The Impact of E-Learning Technologies on Entrepreneurial and Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Elaine C. Rideout & Denis O. Gray, 2013. "Does Entrepreneurship Education Really Work? A Review and Methodological Critique of the Empirical Literature on the Effects of University‐Based Entrepreneurship Education," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 329-351, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kusetogullari & Huseyin Kusetogullari & Martin Andersson & Tony Gorschek, 2025. "GenAI in Entrepreneurship: a systematic review of generative artificial intelligence in entrepreneurship research: current issues and future directions," Papers 2505.05523, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gutierrez, I. & Alcaraz, J.M. & Susaeta, L. & Suarez, E. & Pin , José Ramón, 2015. "Managing Sustainability for Competitive Advantage: Evidence From the Hospitality Industry," IESE Research Papers D/1115, IESE Business School.
    2. Olufunke P. Adebayo & Rowland E. Worlu & Chinonye L. Moses & Olaleke O. Ogunnaike, 2020. "An Integrated Organisational Culture for Sustainable Environmental Performance in the Nigerian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Ponzoa, José M. & Gómez, Andrés & Mas, José M., 2023. "EU27 and USA institutions in the digital ecosystem: Proposal for a digital presence measurement index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Magnus Hoppe, 2016. "Policy and entrepreneurship education," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 13-29, January.
    5. Ikramul Hasan & M. Nazmul Islam, 2022. "Leadership instills organizational effectiveness: a viewpoint on business organizations," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Landström, Hans & Harirchi, Gouya & Åström, Fredrik, 2012. "Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1154-1181.
    7. Haifeng Qian, 2013. "Diversity Versus Tolerance: The Social Drivers of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in US Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2718-2735, October.
    8. Adijati Utaminingsih & Sony Heru Priyanto & John J.O.I. Ihalauw & Linda Kusuma, 2020. "Green Business Behaviour, Green Technologies, and Sustainability in SMEs," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 417-424.
    9. Sahar E-Vahdati & Nor Azila Mohd Noor & Pei Yew Mah & Francis Chuah & Filzah Md Isa, 2023. "Social and Environmental Sustainability, Workers’ Well-Being, and Affective Organizational Commitment in Palm Oil Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Anike Sult & Janice Wobst & Rainer Lueg, 2024. "The role of training in implementing corporate sustainability: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Anabela Dinis, 2024. "The impact of entrepreneurship education on students’ desirability and intentions to pursue an entrepreneurial career: a study in general and vocational secondary schools of Cabo Verde," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Gaëlle Angelergues, 2021. "L'engagement "idéologique" : nouvelles voies conceptuelles de la théorie du contrat psychologique et enjeux pour la RSE," Post-Print hal-03390281, HAL.
    13. João J. M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Sascha Kraus, 2019. "Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 181-205, February.
    14. Oughton, Edward J. & Amaglobeli, David & Moszoro, Marian, 2023. "What would it cost to connect the unconnected? Estimating global universal broadband infrastructure investment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    15. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    16. Johan Graafland & Niels Noorderhaven, 2020. "Culture and institutions: How economic freedom and long-term orientation interactively influence corporate social responsibility," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(6), pages 1034-1043, August.
    17. Honig, Benson & Samuelsson, Mikael, 2014. "Data replication and extension: A study of business planning and venture-level performance," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 1, pages 18-25.
    18. Christopher Durugbo & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2019. "Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1500-1516, November.
    19. Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Deniz Efendioğlu & Serol Bulkan, 2021. "Assessing the social sustainable supply chain indicators using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: a case study of Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4285-4320, March.
    20. Ariyono Setiawan & Munoto Munoto & Luthfiyah Nurlaela & Ekohariadi Ekohariadi, 2021. "Analysis Of The Effect Of Knowledge On Entrepreneurship Readiness Using Random Forest Classification Machine Learning," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 134-149, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:45-:d:1584022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.