IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i2p45-d1584022.html

Technology-Enabled Learning for Green and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Education

Author

Listed:
  • Adina Cocu

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

  • Emilia Pecheanu

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

  • Ioan Susnea

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

  • Sandra Dingli

    (The Edward de Bono Institute for Creative Thinking and Innovation, University of Malta, 2080 Msida, Malta)

  • Adrian Istrate

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

  • Cornelia Tudorie

    (Department of Computers and Information Technology, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, 800210 Galaţi, Romania)

Abstract

(1) Background and objectives: Global crises such as climate change, pandemics, and resource depletion present unprecedented challenges that require coordinated and innovative responses. This study advocates for a bottom-up strategy by proposing and developing tools that empower individuals and organizations to embrace green and sustainable entrepreneurship, fostering localized solutions with global impact. In this context, the research explored the integration of technology-enabled entrepreneurship education (EE) into engineering curricula, with a focus on sustainable and green entrepreneurship. Leveraging insights from European projects, the research developed a cloud-based entrepreneurship educational system featuring three e-learning platforms. Particularly, one e-learning platform was specifically designed to support green and sustainable entrepreneurship education. (2) Methods: the study involved literature reviews, stakeholder surveys, interviews with green entrepreneurs, and iterative platform design. (3) Results: Key outcomes of the research include a methodology for designing pedagogical strategies and learning content for green and sustainable EE. Additionally, digital tools such as the green business innovation canvas, TRIZ-inspired matrices, and AI-driven recommendation systems were created to equip learners with the skills to develop sustainable business models. (4) Originality: The study’s novelty lies in its integration of advanced digital tools with original pedagogical strategies, providing a scalable framework for incorporating sustainability into entrepreneurship education. These findings have practical implications for educators and policymakers working to promote eco-friendly business practices. Future research should investigate the scalability of these tools across diverse educational contexts and evaluate their long-term impact on fostering sustainable entrepreneurial mindsets.

Suggested Citation

  • Adina Cocu & Emilia Pecheanu & Ioan Susnea & Sandra Dingli & Adrian Istrate & Cornelia Tudorie, 2025. "Technology-Enabled Learning for Green and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Education," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:45-:d:1584022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/2/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/2/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    2. Sichu Liu & Hongyi Sun & Jiahao Zhuang & Rui Xiong, 2023. "The Impact of E-Learning Technologies on Entrepreneurial and Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Katz, Jerome A., 2003. "The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876-1999," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 283-300, March.
    4. Lythreatis, Sophie & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2022. "The digital divide: A review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Elaine C. Rideout & Denis O. Gray, 2013. "Does Entrepreneurship Education Really Work? A Review and Methodological Critique of the Empirical Literature on the Effects of University‐Based Entrepreneurship Education," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 329-351, July.
    6. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Kusetogullari & Huseyin Kusetogullari & Martin Andersson & Tony Gorschek, 2025. "GenAI in Entrepreneurship: a systematic review of generative artificial intelligence in entrepreneurship research: current issues and future directions," Papers 2505.05523, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Yuan & Yang, Yusen & Wang, Chun & Zou, Jianke, 2025. "Exploring the digital divide–poverty link: Roles of education and family dependency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PC).
    2. Anaraky, Reza Ghaiumy & Alsoubai, Ashwaq & Hanebutt, Rachel A. & Nov, Oded & Wisniewski, Pamela J., 2025. "Reframing the digital divide: From barriers of internet non-use to gradients of use — Case study of a Southern U.S. city," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Zhu, Yifeng & Li, Qinghai, 2025. "Impact of the three digital divides on residents’ commercial insurance purchase behavior: An empirical study based in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Maria Grazia Diana & Maria Lidia Mascia & Łukasz Tomczyk & Maria Pietronilla Penna, 2025. "The Digital Divide and the Elderly: How Urban and Rural Realities Shape Well-Being and Social Inclusion in the Sardinian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    6. Qiu, Jiuyun & Cheng, Lei & Hu, Qiwen & Wang, Peigang, 2025. "How digital and social isolation drive frailty transitions in middle-aged and elderly adults populations: a seven-year multicohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    7. Messele Kumilachew Aga, 2023. "The mediating role of perceived behavioral control in the relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.
    9. Gutierrez, I. & Alcaraz, J.M. & Susaeta, L. & Suarez, E. & Pin , José Ramón, 2015. "Managing Sustainability for Competitive Advantage: Evidence From the Hospitality Industry," IESE Research Papers D/1115, IESE Business School.
    10. Saurabh A. Lall & Li-Wei Chen & Dyana P. Mason, 2023. "Digital platforms and entrepreneurial support: a field experiment in online mentoring," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 631-654, August.
    11. Olufunke P. Adebayo & Rowland E. Worlu & Chinonye L. Moses & Olaleke O. Ogunnaike, 2020. "An Integrated Organisational Culture for Sustainable Environmental Performance in the Nigerian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Catherine Le Roux & Marius Pretorius, 2016. "Conceptualizing the Limiting Issues Inhibiting Sustainability Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    13. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.
    14. Ponzoa, José M. & Gómez, Andrés & Mas, José M., 2023. "EU27 and USA institutions in the digital ecosystem: Proposal for a digital presence measurement index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Mengyu Cai & Nan Zhou, 2025. "A CEO’s Childhood Family Decline and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Mediating Role of Long-Term Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 623-648, September.
    16. Magnus Hoppe, 2016. "Policy and entrepreneurship education," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 13-29, January.
    17. Ikramul Hasan & M. Nazmul Islam, 2022. "Leadership instills organizational effectiveness: a viewpoint on business organizations," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Santiago Gutiérrez-Broncano & Jorge Linuesa-Langreo & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2025. "Exploring the reality of corporate sustainability strategy and sales performance in entrepreneurial SMEs: the mediating effect of innovation and sustainability performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-34, December.
    19. Luo, Peikun & Chen, Yongqing & Shan, Donglu & Wang, Pengcheng, 2025. "Internet use, social capital and high-quality employment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Viju Raghupathi & Jie Ren & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2020. "Identifying Corporate Sustainability Issues by Analyzing Shareholder Resolutions: A Machine-Learning Text Analytics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:45-:d:1584022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.