IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1718-d1594327.html

The Digital Divide and the Elderly: How Urban and Rural Realities Shape Well-Being and Social Inclusion in the Sardinian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Grazia Diana

    (Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Maria Lidia Mascia

    (Department of History, Humanities and Education, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Łukasz Tomczyk

    (Institute of Education, Jagiellonian University, 31-007 Kraków, Poland)

  • Maria Pietronilla Penna

    (Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

Abstract

The Digital Grey Divide (DGD) is a phenomenon that refers to the digital inequality existing among the elderly in using digital tools. DGD could generate social exclusion and hinder elderly well-being because today many aspects of life are online. The objective of the research is to compare the urban and rural group to see if a digital divide is present and whether psychological and cognitive well-being can be predictors of usage. The research involved 100 elderly people (belonging to two different areas: one rural and one urban) aged 65 to 90 (M = 72.3; SD = 6.4) with intact cognitive functioning investigated by the MMSE test. A socio-anagraphic module to investigate digital use (DU), a questionnaire on cognitive reserve (CRIq), and a questionnaire investigating well-being (Ben-SSC) were administered. Results showed that the two groups differ in terms of access and use of digital tools (F = 28.34, p < 0.001), with the urban group reporting higher levels of access and use. Moreover, in the urban group, psychological well-being has an inverse relationship with digital, while in the rural group, the relationship between cognitive well-being and use is direct. Therefore, the study aims to highlight how even in developed countries there can be a digital divide (DD) given the risks of exclusion, particularly for the elderly population. For all these reasons, it is necessary to pursue interventions to achieve a higher level of digitalization and sustainable development among the population. Given the importance of this phenomenon, it is necessary to address the issue of DD in various spheres of life: political, social, economic and care.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Grazia Diana & Maria Lidia Mascia & Łukasz Tomczyk & Maria Pietronilla Penna, 2025. "The Digital Divide and the Elderly: How Urban and Rural Realities Shape Well-Being and Social Inclusion in the Sardinian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1718-:d:1594327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1718/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1718/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lythreatis, Sophie & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2022. "The digital divide: A review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Genghua Huang & Samuel Ampadu Oteng, 2023. "Gerontechnology for better elderly care and life quality: a systematic literature review," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    4. Alina Betlej, 2023. "Social Networks, New Technologies, and Wellbeing—An Interview Study on Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Successful Ageing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Alexander van Deursen & Jan van Dijk & Ellen Helsper, 2014. "Investigating outcomes of online engagement," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59994, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Daria A. Kashtanova & Anastasiia N. Taraskina & Veronika V. Erema & Anna A. Akopyan & Mikhail V. Ivanov & Irina D. Strazhesko & Alexandra I. Akinshina & Vladimir S. Yudin & Valentin V. Makarov & Serge, 2022. "Analyzing Successful Aging and Longevity: Risk Factors and Health Promoters in 2020 Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Marielle Schirmer & Katharina Dalko & Dietrich Stoevesandt & Denny Paulicke & Patrick Jahn, 2023. "Educational Concepts of Digital Competence Development for Older Adults—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patricio Esteban Ramírez-Correa & Ari Melo Mariano & Maíra Rocha Santos, 2025. "Digital and Sustainable Education and Social Inclusion: A Bibliometric Review with the Consolidated Meta-Analytical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Yuan & Yang, Yusen & Wang, Chun & Zou, Jianke, 2025. "Exploring the digital divide–poverty link: Roles of education and family dependency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PC).
    2. Anaraky, Reza Ghaiumy & Alsoubai, Ashwaq & Hanebutt, Rachel A. & Nov, Oded & Wisniewski, Pamela J., 2025. "Reframing the digital divide: From barriers of internet non-use to gradients of use — Case study of a Southern U.S. city," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Adina Cocu & Emilia Pecheanu & Ioan Susnea & Sandra Dingli & Adrian Istrate & Cornelia Tudorie, 2025. "Technology-Enabled Learning for Green and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Education," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Zhu, Yifeng & Li, Qinghai, 2025. "Impact of the three digital divides on residents’ commercial insurance purchase behavior: An empirical study based in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Qiu, Jiuyun & Cheng, Lei & Hu, Qiwen & Wang, Peigang, 2025. "How digital and social isolation drive frailty transitions in middle-aged and elderly adults populations: a seven-year multicohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    6. Ponzoa, José M. & Gómez, Andrés & Mas, José M., 2023. "EU27 and USA institutions in the digital ecosystem: Proposal for a digital presence measurement index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Luo, Peikun & Chen, Yongqing & Shan, Donglu & Wang, Pengcheng, 2025. "Internet use, social capital and high-quality employment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Simplice A. Asongu & Sara Roux, 2024. "The Role of Mobile Money Innovations in the Effect of Inequality on Poverty and Severity of Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1565-1579, August.
    9. Volz, Felix & Münch, Christopher & Lohmüller, Marcel & Küffner, Christoph, 2025. "From data jungle to data governance in digital ecosystems: Empirical evidence from a multiple holistic case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Sen Gao & Hao Li, 2025. "Digitalization and Carbon Performance: Structural Changes in Emerging Economies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(6), pages 17728-17754, December.
    11. Roger Enriquez & David Han & Richard Harris & Christopher Reddick, 2025. "Exploring digital access and digital engagement of senior small business owners," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 3631-3647, August.
    12. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Giulio Fusco & Mario Intini & Gianluca Monturano, 2026. "Digital divide and income inequality: causal evidence from Italian provinces," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 75(1), pages 1-45, March.
    14. Zhang, Haiyang & Wang, Lina & Song, Wenda, 2025. "Do multicultural barriers hinder fintech development? A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. P. M. Vik & D. Kamerāde & K. T. Dayson, 2024. "The Link Between Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion—Evidence from Consumers Survey Data from Low-Income Areas," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 373-393, September.
    16. Ioana Andreea Bogoslov & Sorina Corman & Anca Elena Lungu, 2024. "Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Adoption for European Union Elderly in the Context of Digital Skills Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-34, May.
    17. Yanglin Li & Yuezheng Yang & Shuyao Shi & Bin Wang & Guangquan Chen, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Seniors’ Knowledge-Based Digital Marginalization in the Era of Information Technology Advancements," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12622-12650, September.
    18. Michelle Müller, 2025. "Guardians of Giving - An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Charitable Crowdfunding and Acquisitive Crime," Working Papers Dissertations 141, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    19. Jamal, Shaila & Li, Chunjiang & Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio & Farber, Steven, 2025. "Exploring equity implications of online grocery, online restaurant delivery and e-shopping service usage in a suburban context," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. Mohsen Farhadloo & Saman Asvadi & Kash Khorasani, 2025. "Potential vulnerabilities associated with emerging technologies: insights from a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 1717-1760, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1718-:d:1594327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.