IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4579-d1403840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Adoption for European Union Elderly in the Context of Digital Skills Development

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana Andreea Bogoslov

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550324 Sibiu, Romania)

  • Sorina Corman

    (Center for Social Research, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania)

  • Anca Elena Lungu

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, 700506 Iași, Romania)

Abstract

In today’s digitalized era, embracing new and emerging technologies is a requirement to remain competitive. The present research investigates the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) by the elderly in the European landscape, emphasizing the importance of individuals’ digital skills. As has already been globally recognized, the most imminent demographic challenge is no longer represented by the rapid growth of the population but by its aging. Thus, the paper initially analyzed European perspectives on AI adoption, also discussing the importance of focusing on seniors. A bibliometric analysis was required afterward, and the review of the resulting relevant scientific publications uncovered gaps in understanding the relationship between older individuals and AI, particularly in terms of digital competence. Further exploration considered the EU population’s digital literacy and cultural influences using Hofstede’s model, while also identifying potential ways to improve the elderly’s digital skills and promote the adoption of AI. Results indicate a growing interest in AI adoption among the elderly, underscoring the urgent need for digital skills development. The imperative of personalized approach implementations, such as specialized courses, personalized training sessions, or mentoring programs, was underscored. Moreover, the importance of targeted strategies and collaborative efforts to ensure equitable participation in the digital age was identified as a prerequisite for AI adoption by seniors. In terms of potential implications, the research can serve as a starting point for various stakeholders in promoting an effective and sustainable adoption of AI among older citizens in the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana Andreea Bogoslov & Sorina Corman & Anca Elena Lungu, 2024. "Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Adoption for European Union Elderly in the Context of Digital Skills Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-34, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4579-:d:1403840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4579/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4579/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert Haque & Arnold Milstein & Li Fei-Fei, 2020. "Illuminating the dark spaces of healthcare with ambient intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 585(7824), pages 193-202, September.
    2. Erumban, Abdul Azeez & de Jong, Simon B., 2006. "Cross-country differences in ICT adoption: A consequence of Culture?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 302-314, December.
    3. Serge-Lopez Wamba-Taguimdje & Samuel Fosso Wamba & Jean Robert Kala Kamdjoug & Chris Emmanuel Tchatchouang Wanko, 2020. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Firm Performance: Exploring the Mediating Effect of Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Rocco Agrifoglio & Rita Lamboglia & Daniela Mancini & Francesca Ricciardi (ed.), Digital Business Transformation, pages 3-18, Springer.
    4. Scott McCoy & Dennis F Galletta & William R King, 2007. "Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 81-90, February.
    5. Marielle Schirmer & Katharina Dalko & Dietrich Stoevesandt & Denny Paulicke & Patrick Jahn, 2023. "Educational Concepts of Digital Competence Development for Older Adults—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-18, June.
    6. James Love-Koh & Alison Peel & Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla & Kate Ennis & Rosemary Lovett & Andrea Manca & Anastasia Chalkidou & Hannah Wood & Matthew Taylor, 2018. "The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(12), pages 1439-1451, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlo Drago & Alberto Costantiello & Marco Savorgnan & Angelo Leogrande, 2025. "Macroeconomic and Labor Market Drivers of AI Adoption in Europe: A Machine Learning and Panel Data Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-62, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2022. "Designing AI‐augmented healthcare delivery systems for physician buy‐in and patient acceptance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4443-4451, December.
    2. Alexander Zuber & Kerstin Rubarth & Frank Förster & Felix Balzer & Claudia Spies & Daniel Fürstenau & Oliver Kumpf, 2024. "The impact of adhering to a quality indicator for sedation, analgesia, and delirium management on costs, revenues, and clinical outcomes in intensive care in Germany: A retrospective observational stu," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Ana León-Gómez & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of ICT adoption on SMEs performance: the mediating roles of corporate social responsibility and innovation," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 831-866, September.
    4. repec:ddj:parsro:y:2013:i:2:p:53-61 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Garg, Vipul & Gabaldon, Janeth & Niranjan, Suman & Hawkins, Timothy G., 2025. "Impact of strategic performance measures on performance: The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Uzuegbunam, Ikenna & Geringer, J. Michael, 2021. "Culture, connectedness, and international adoption of disruptive innovation," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    7. Qu, Wen Guang & Yang, Zhiyong & Wang, Zhongming, 2011. "Multi-level framework of open source software adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 997-1003, September.
    8. Humphrey M. Sabi & Faith-Michael E. Uzoka & Kehbuma Langmia & Felix N. Njeh & Clive K. Tsuma, 0. "A cross-country model of contextual factors impacting cloud computing adoption at universities in sub-Saharan Africa," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    9. Armenia ANDRONICEANU & Oana-Matilda SABIE & Irina GEORGESCU & Andreea-Ligia DRUGAU-CONSTANTIN, 2023. "Main Factors And Causes That Are Influencing The Digital Competences Of Human Resources," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2023(41), pages 26-53.
    10. Md Billal Hossain & Nargis Dewan & Aslan Amat Senin & Csaba Balint Illes, 2025. "Evaluating the utilization of technological factors to promote e-commerce adoption in small and medium enterprises," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 349-368, February.
    11. Emmanuel Senior Tenakwah & Emmanuel Junior Tenakwah & Mary Amponsah & Sarah Eyaa & Elliot Boateng & Nekpen Okhawere, 2022. "Adoption of Sustainable Technologies during Crisis: Examining Employees’ Perception and Readiness across Cultures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Hernan G. Roxas & Val Lindsay & Nicholas Ashill & Antong Victorio, 2007. "Institutional analysis of strategic choice of micro, small, and medium enterprises : a conceptual framework," Philippine Review of Economics, University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society, vol. 44(1), pages 151-186, June.
    13. Lavezzolo, Sebastián & Rodríguez-Lluesma, Carlos & Elvira, Marta M., 2018. "National culture and financial systems: The conditioning role of political context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 60-72.
    14. Guerzoni, Marco & Jordan, Alexander, 2016. "“Cursed is the ground because of you”: Religion, Ethnicity, and the Adoption of Fertilizers in Rural Ethiopia," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201605, University of Turin.
    15. Urvashi Tandon & Ravi Kiran & Ash N. Sah, 2018. "The influence of website functionality, drivers and perceived risk on customer satisfaction in online shopping: an emerging economy case," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 57-91, February.
    16. Han, Yilong & Li, Yinbo & Li, Yongkui & Yang, Bin & Cao, Lingyan, 2023. "Digital twinning for smart hospital operations: Framework and proof of concept," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Sanguineti, Francesca & Maran, Thomas, 2024. "Navigating the clouds: Cultural influences on technology acceptance in the workplace," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Laura Lucia-Palacios & Victoria Bordonoba-Juste & Raúl Pérez-López, 2021. "Consumer-to-consumer reselling adoption among European countries: differences between old and young millennials," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(2), pages 253-279, June.
    19. Galang, Roberto Martin N., 2014. "Divergent diffusion: Understanding the interaction between institutions, firms, networks and knowledge in the international adoption of technology," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 512-521.
    20. Pancs Romans, 2017. "Tight and Loose Coupling in Organizations," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-33, January.
    21. Faqih, Khaled M.S. & Jaradat, Mohammed-Issa Riad Mousa, 2015. "Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 37-52.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4579-:d:1403840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.