IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i4p144-d953144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Digitalization on Innovation Capabilities through the Lenses of the Knowledge Management Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Sánchez Ramírez

    (Department of Business Management, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

  • Fátima Guadamillas Gómez

    (Department of Business Management, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

  • Mª Isabel González Ramos

    (Department of Business Management, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

  • Olga Grieva

    (Department of Business Management, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

Abstract

In recent years, the knowledge management approach of the firm has emerged as the central theoretical perspective intended to address the question of adaptation to technological change. As for theoretical and practical implications, we proposed a comprehensive model that provides an integrative outlook on how the relationships between digitalization and knowledge management strategy predetermine the business results of the firm. To this purpose, we empirically analyzed the effect of digitalization on knowledge management, and how this contributes to the improvement of the company’s results in the IT, technology, consulting, and programming sectors by testing the hypotheses through the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). A group of 620 companies was targeted for collecting the data by quantitative means of analysis—a questionnaire. The final sample was composed of 78 companies, which corresponds to 12.58% (response rate). The research findings offer an explicit foundation, on which to base future research efforts in evaluating the ways companies should approach digital transformation, strengthen the knowledge management role in this process, develop the digital and innovation capabilities, and finally, ameliorate the effects on business performance, what also represents a certain value for the executives or individuals in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Sánchez Ramírez & Fátima Guadamillas Gómez & Mª Isabel González Ramos & Olga Grieva, 2022. "The Effect of Digitalization on Innovation Capabilities through the Lenses of the Knowledge Management Strategy," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:144-:d:953144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/4/144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hani El-Chaarani & Zouhour El-Abiad, 2020. "Knowledge Management and Job Performance: The Case of Lebanese Banking Sector," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 91-98.
    2. Abdul Karim Feroz & Hangjung Zo & Ananth Chiravuri, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Donald C. Hambrick & Ian C. MacMillan & Ricardo R. Barbosa, 1983. "Business Unit Strategy and Changes in the Product R&D Budget," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(7), pages 757-769, July.
    4. Escribano, Alvaro & Fosfuri, Andrea & Tribó, Josep A., 2009. "Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 96-105, February.
    5. Ira Puspitasari & Ferry Jie, 2020. "Making the information technology-business alignment works: a framework of IT-based competitive strategy," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 34(1), pages 59-82.
    6. Michael H. Zack, 2005. "The strategic advantage of knowledge and learning," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20.
    7. Mathias Eggert & Jens Alberts, 2020. "Frontiers of business intelligence and analytics 3.0: a taxonomy-based literature review and research agenda," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 685-739, July.
    8. Jörg Henseler & Marko Sarstedt, 2013. "Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 565-580, April.
    9. Benn Lawson & Danny Samson, 2001. "Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 377-400.
    10. Uma Gunasilan, 2019. "Entrepreneurship as a Driver of the Digital Transformation," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 23-29.
    11. Di Vaio, Assunta & Palladino, Rosa & Pezzi, Alberto & Kalisz, David E., 2021. "The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 220-231.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omar Belkhodja, 2022. "Managing Knowledge Resources in Family Firms: Opportunity or Challenge?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Donate, Mario J. & González-Mohíno, Miguel & Paolo Appio, Francesco & Bernhard, Fabian, 2022. "Dealing with knowledge hiding to improve innovation capabilities in the hotel industry: The unconventional role of knowledge-oriented leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 572-586.
    3. repec:hal:journl:hal-03650216 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Iva Gregurec & Martina Tomičić Furjan & Katarina Tomičić-Pupek, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Sustainable Business Models in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Long Xue & Qianyu Zhang & Xuemang Zhang & Chengyu Li, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Sikandar Ali Qalati & Dragana Ostic & Gu Shuibin & Fan Mingyue, 2022. "A mediated–moderated model for social media adoption and small and medium‐sized enterprise performance in emerging countries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 846-861, April.
    7. Martin Heidenreich (ed.), 2012. "Innovation and Institutional Embeddedness of Multinational Companies," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14459.
    8. Caroline Danièle Mothe & Thuc Uyen Nguyen-Thi, 2017. "Persistent openness and environmental innovation: An empirical analysis of French manufacturing firms," Post-Print hal-01609129, HAL.
    9. RAJI, Ismaheel Adewumi & Ladan, Sahnun & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Idris, Isma’il Tijjani, 2021. "Organisational Commitment, Work Engagement and Job Performance: Empirical Study on Nigeria’s Public Healthcare System," OSF Preprints 6v9jw, Center for Open Science.
    10. Daniele Schiliro, 2015. "Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises in the United Arab Emirates," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(5), pages 148-160, September.
    11. Wang, Yonggui & Hong, Aoran & Li, Xia & Gao, Jia, 2020. "Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 214-220.
    12. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Carmen Serrano-Valdecillos & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán, 2022. "Analysis of the Dialogue with Stakeholders by the IBEX 35 Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Ruxandra DINULESCU & Laura Violeta VOICU, 2014. "Quality Management In Romania’S Private And State Hospitals," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(3), pages 45-53, September.
    14. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    15. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    16. Danai Christopoulou & Nikolaos Papageorgiadis & Chengang Wang & Georgios Magkonis, 2021. "IPR Law Protection and Enforcement and the Effect on Horizontal Productivity Spillovers from Inward FDI to Domestic Firms: A Meta-analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 235-266, April.
    17. Osama Sohaib & Kyeong Kang & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2018. "Gender-Based iTrust in E-Commerce: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Agata Sudolska & Justyna Łapińska, 2020. "Exploring Determinants of Innovation Capability in Manufacturing Companies Operating in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Taheri, Mozhdeh & van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2019. "Knowledge relationships of university spin-off firms: Contrasting dynamics in global reach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 193-204.
    20. Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci & Marco Pontis, 2012. "Intangible capital and firms' productivity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(2), pages 377-402, April.
    21. Hossein Rahnama & Kerstin Johansen & Lisa Larsson & Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck, 2022. "Collaboration in Value Constellations for Sustainable Production: The Perspective of Small Technology Solution Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:144-:d:953144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.