IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i4p1122-1149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advertisements: The Congruity Effect with the Communion-Self and Pursuit-Self

Author

Listed:
  • Konrad Hryniewicz
  • Barbara Marciszewska
  • Aleksandra Grobelna
  • Tomasz Studzieniecki
  • Marzena Wanagos

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to present how the self-congruity mechanism is responsible for advertising evaluation processes which result from the similarity of the content in the advertisement to one's own self and goals. The importance of different content in advertisements has been the subject of numerous studies. Some of these studies have provided support for the importance of communion in the effectiveness of marketing, while others have omitted the role of agency. It is proposed that this inconsistency can be explained by taking into account the fact that people evaluate products in advertisements through self-congruity with their own communion and goals. Design/Research questions: Two questions are answered in the article: 1) What personal characteristics are related to attitudes toward agentic and communal advertisements? 2) Which mechanism mediates between these personal characteristics and attitudes toward agentic and communal advertisements? Findings: The set of three studies (N = 136, N = 163, N = 134) showed that experimental advertisements were perceived as highly agentic or highly communal. Furthermore, the experiment (N= 354) showed that the agentic advertisement influenced stronger relations between a recipient's goal and attitudes. Additionally, the communal advertisement influenced stronger relations between recipient's communion and attitudes. In both conditions, the self-congruity mechanism mediated these relations. Practical recommendations: The study shows that the valuation of products is consistent with fundamental dimensions of human life, namely pursuing personal goals and initiating and maintaining social relationships. Originality: The research is an attempt to fill the gap in the literature by contributing to measuring the self-congruity mechanism between personal dispositions and the content in product advertising. Moreover, the form of the influence of experimental advertisements on a series of measurements, verified using the SEM-PLS modeling technique, is a novelty in the field of self-congruity research and is the basis for drawing cause-and-effect conclusions. Despite the declarative measurements, the nature of the experiment allows for conclusions about the influence of its conditions on different patterns of relations and intensity of crucial measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • Konrad Hryniewicz & Barbara Marciszewska & Aleksandra Grobelna & Tomasz Studzieniecki & Marzena Wanagos, 2024. "Advertisements: The Congruity Effect with the Communion-Self and Pursuit-Self," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1122-1149.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:1122-1149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3561/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0238714 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kressmann, Frank & Sirgy, M. Joseph & Herrmann, Andreas & Huber, Frank & Huber, Stephanie & Lee, Dong-Jin, 2006. "Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 955-964, September.
    3. Richard M. Ryan & Veronika Huta & Edward Deci, 2008. "Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 139-170, January.
    4. Ned Kock, 2015. "PLS-based SEM Algorithms: The Good Neighbor Assumption, Collinearity, and Nonlinearity," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 7(2), pages 113-130.
    5. Jacoby, Jacob & Hoyer, Wayne D, 1989. "The Comprehension/Miscomprehension of Print Communication: Selected Findings," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(4), pages 434-443, March.
    6. Sirgy, M Joseph, 1982. "Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(3), pages 287-300, December.
    7. Jackaria Nazneen Carrim, 2018. "The Mediating Role of Actual Self-Congruity on the Relationship between Religion and Store Loyalty: A Case of Mauritius," GATR Journals jmmr196, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    8. Hughes, R Eugene, 1976. "Self-Concept and Brand Preference: A Partial Replication," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(4), pages 530-540, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reza Fazli-Salehi & Ivonne M. Torres & Rozbeh Madadi & Miguel Ángel Zúñiga, 2022. "The impact of interpersonal traits (extraversion and agreeableness) on consumers’ self-brand connection and communal-brand connection with anthropomorphized brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(1), pages 13-34, January.
    2. Carol Yirong Lu & Allan Cheng Chieh Lu, 2022. "Parasocial Interaction, Destination Personality Fit and Consumers’ Behavioral Intentions: The Case of TV Shopping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Massicotte, Marie-Claude & Michon, Richard & Chebat, Jean-Charles & Joseph Sirgy, M. & Borges, Adilson, 2011. "Effects of mall atmosphere on mall evaluation: Teenage versus adult shoppers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 74-80.
    4. Tom Joonhwan Kim & Youjae Yi & Jongan Choi, 2020. "The boomerang effect of brand personality congruency in a product-harm crisis," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(4), pages 645-661, November.
    5. Janssen, Catherine & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Leblanc, Sina, 2017. "Should luxury brands say it out loud? Brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 167-174.
    6. Desveaud, Kathleen & Mandler, Timo & Eisend, Martin, 2024. "A meta-model of customer brand loyalty and its antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Jörg Lindenmeier & Christian Arnold & Adnan Zogaj & Dieter K. Tscheulin, 2021. "Congruence constructs as mediators of stereotypic image perceptions’ effect on student volunteering intention," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 575-597, December.
    8. Zhu, Xiajing & Teng, Lefa & Foti, Lianne & Yuan, Yige, 2019. "Using self-congruence theory to explain the interaction effects of brand type and celebrity type on consumer attitude formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 301-309.
    9. Asma Amjad & Fiza Amjad & Khalid Jamil & Sharjeel Yousaf, 2018. "Moderating role of self-congruence: Impact of brand personality on Brand attachment through the Mediating role of Trust," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 10(1), pages 13-22.
    10. Mark Ng & Monica Law & Ka-fu Kevin Lin, 2024. "Determinants of smartphone brand switching intention of consumers in Hong Kong," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 275-289, June.
    11. Avis, Mark, 2012. "Brand personality factor based models: A critical review," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 89-96.
    12. Chebat, Jean-Charles & El Hedhli, Kamel & Sirgy, M. Joseph, 2009. "How does shopper-based mall equity generate mall loyalty? A conceptual model and empirical evidence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 50-60.
    13. Elbedweihy, Alaa M. & Jayawardhena, Chanaka & Elsharnouby, Mohamed H. & Elsharnouby, Tamer H., 2016. "Customer relationship building: The role of brand attractiveness and consumer–brand identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2901-2910.
    14. Japutra, Arnold & Ekinci, Yuksel & Simkin, Lyndon, 2019. "Self-congruence, brand attachment and compulsive buying," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 456-463.
    15. Donvito, Raffaele & Aiello, Gaetano & Grazzini, Laura & Godey, Bruno & Pederzoli, Daniele & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter & Halliburton, Chris & Chan, Priscilla & Tsuchiya, Junji & Skorobogatykh, Irina Ivanov, 2020. "Does personality congruence explain luxury brand attachment? The results of an international research study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 462-472.
    16. Bettels, Jannick & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter, 2019. "Brand logo symmetry and product design: The spillover effects on consumer inferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-9.
    17. Monika Monika & Ferdi Antonio, 2022. "How Superhero Characters Shape Brand Alliances and Leverage the Local Brand: The Evidence from Indonesia," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Matzler, Kurt & Strobl, Andreas & Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola & Bobovnicky, Artur & Bauer, Florian, 2016. "Brand personality and culture: The role of cultural differences on the impact of brand personality perceptions on tourists' visit intentions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 507-520.
    19. Shaohua Yang & Salmi Mohd Isa & T. Ramayah, 2020. "A Theoretical Framework to Explain the Impact of Destination Personality, Self-Congruity, and Tourists’ Emotional Experience on Behavioral Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    20. Ingrid Moons & Patrick De Pelsmacker, 2015. "Self-Brand Personality Differences and Attitudes towards Electric Cars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Communion; agency; advertising effectiveness; self-congruity; PLS-SEM.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising
    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:4:p:1122-1149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.