IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiy2018i3p77-89.html

Network Economy as a New Economic System

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Ustyuzhanina
  • Sergey Evsukov
  • Irina Komarova

Abstract

his work deals with the study of new socio-economic relations, which are established due to the introduction of information and communication technologies. Associated problems are currently widely discussed in the scientific literature primarily from a technological point of view. Moreover, the attention is paid to ongoing and future changes in various markets, including the labor market. The article proposes to distinguish the concepts of digital revolution and digital economy. It is maintained that the digital revolution is not a technological revolution, but a social revolution that is comparable in importance to the Neolithic, Class and Industrial revolutions. It is grounded that the digital revolution results in the formation of a new economic system, which can be called the network economy. The research objective is to determine the key features of a new type of economy, namely, the forms of the division of labor peculiar to this system, the types of transactions, the ways of coordination of activities and the foundations of power. The scientific hypothesis of the work is the following one: the digital revolution leads not just to structural shifts in the economy and modification of the ways of market interaction, but to a fundamental change in the economic system. The research is based on the methodology of institutional theory. The result of the study is the substantiation of the statement about the change of the paradigm of economic development - the gradual replacement of the market economy by the network economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Ustyuzhanina & Sergey Evsukov & Irina Komarova, 2018. "Network Economy as a New Economic System," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 77-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxi:y:2018:i:3:p:77-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2018_XXI_3_6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Nagurney & June Dong & Ding Zhang, 2002. "Supply Chain Networks with Electronic Commerce," Computing in Economics and Finance 2002 371, Society for Computational Economics.
    2. Peter Nijkamp, 2003. "Entrepreneurship in a Modern Network Economy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 395-405.
    3. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    4. Anna Nagurney & Jon Loo & June Dong & Ding Zhang, 2002. "Supply Chain Networks and Electronic Commerce: A Theoretical Perspective," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 187-220, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elzbieta Szaruga & Elzbieta Zaloga, 2021. "Global Network Economy Society: Information Needs on the Ethical Framework and Trust in Transportation and Logistics Business among Users of the Google Search Engine," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 835-849.
    2. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:989-1009 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:835-849 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Jun & Nault, Barrie R. & Tu, Yiliu (Paul), 2023. "Customer segmentation, pricing, and lead time decisions: A stochastic-user-equilibrium perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Hsueh, Che-Fu & Chang, Mei-Shiang, 2008. "Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 116-129, October.
    3. Dana Hassani & Anna Nagurney & Oleg Nivievskyi & Pavlo Martyshev, 2025. "A Multiperiod, Multicommodity, Capacitated International Agricultural Trade Network Equilibrium Model with Applications to Ukraine in Wartime," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 143-164, January.
    4. Charles Angelucci & Julia Cagé & Michael Sinkinson, 2024. "Media Competition and News Diets," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 62-102, May.
    5. Jeitschko, Thomas D. & Kim, Soo Jin & Yankelevich, Aleksandr, 2018. "A cautionary note on using hotelling models in platform markets," DICE Discussion Papers 286, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    6. Nijkamp, P. & Stough, R. & Sahin, M., 2009. "Impact of social and human capital on business performance of migrant entrepreneurs - a comparative dutch-us study," Serie Research Memoranda 0017, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    7. Zinman, Jonathan, 2009. "Debit or credit?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 358-366, February.
    8. Estelle Malavolti, 2016. "Single Till or Dual Till at airports: a Two-Sided Market Analysis," Post-Print hal-01406372, HAL.
    9. Kummer, Michael & Schulte, Patrick, 2014. "Money and privacy: Android market evidence," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-131, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Wilfred Amaldoss & Jinzhao Du & Woochoel Shin, 2024. "Pricing Strategy of Competing Media Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 488-505, May.
    11. Büch, Martin-Peter & Maennig, Wolfgang & Schulke, Hans-Jürgen (ed.), 2012. "Sport und Sportgroßveranstaltungen in Europa - zwischen Zentralstaat und Regionen," Edition HWWI, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI), volume 4, number 4.
    12. Nagler Matthew G., 2007. "Understanding the Internet's Relevance to Media Ownership Policy: A Model of Too Many Choices," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, June.
    13. Bohan Zhang, 2025. "Platform Competition with User-Generated Content," Papers 2512.08876, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    14. Yang, Hai & Shao, Chaoyi & Wang, Hai & Ye, Jieping, 2020. "Integrated reward scheme and surge pricing in a ridesourcing market," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 126-142.
    15. Alejandro Castañeda & Cesar Martinelli, 2015. "Political Economics of Broadcast Media," Working Papers 1055, George Mason University, Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science.
    16. Tetsuya Shinkai & Naoshi Doi, 2023. "Menu-pricing and Quality Decisions of a Platform Monopolist," Discussion Paper Series 252, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
    17. Martin Peitz & Sven Rady & Piers Trepper, 2017. "Experimentation in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 128-172.
    18. Stijn Claessens & Tara Rice, 2026. "Cross-border payment technologies: innovations and challenges," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 167.
    19. Stefan Behringer & Lapo Filistrucchi, 2015. "Areeda–Turner in Two-Sided Markets," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 46(3), pages 287-306, May.
    20. Lam, W., 2015. "Switching Costs in Two-sided Markets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015024, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxi:y:2018:i:3:p:77-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.