IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/social/v2y2022i3id18086.html

Institutional Rationale for Balanced Scorecard Adoption and Performance of Kenya's State Corporations

Author

Listed:
  • joseph Ouma Osewe

    (Judiciary of Kenya, Kenya)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between institutional rationale in balanced scorecard adoption and the performance of state corporations of Kenya. The research design employed in this study was an explanatory cross-sectional survey design. The research population consisted of 96 managers of state corporations in Kenya. Structured questionnaires containing closed-ended questions were administered using the drop and pick method. A total of 92 questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 96%. Statistically, this was large enough to render the results permissible and acceptable as a representation of the entire population. The results indicated that institutional rationale in balanced scorecard adoption is a good predictor of organizational performance of state corporations of Kenya supported by (F=8.824, p

Suggested Citation

  • joseph Ouma Osewe, 2022. "Institutional Rationale for Balanced Scorecard Adoption and Performance of Kenya's State Corporations," European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(3), pages 95-101, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:2:y:2022:i:3:id:18086
    DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.3.86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/view/18086
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/download/18086/4483
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.3.86?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:2:y:2022:i:3:id:18086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.