IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eph/journl/v4y2009i3n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the mood for a commercial break? A model of consumer response to television commercials during sensitive news

Author

Listed:
  • Anca C. MICU

    (Sacred Heart University)

  • Esther THORSON

    (Missouri School of Journalism)

  • Michael ANTECOL

    (Pollara, Inc.)

Abstract

Marketers decided to pull over $100 million worth of commercials from network, cable, local and syndicated TV outlets on the United States market in the first 48 hours of the 2003 Iraq war. Given this loss to advertisers and media, we looked at how consumers respond to commercials during wartime. Would they change their attitude towards products that are advertised during war coverage? Would they consider advertising during such coverage inappropriate? Consistent with previous mood theory study findings, the results suggest a positive relationship between the mood generated by the interest in the program content and support for advertisements during the program. We also found that factors influencing the mood induced by war coverage were support for the President’s decisions and for the war. These findings open the door to a completely new line of research on attitudes towards media contents. Future research could explore the relationship between political ideology of viewers and their mood when watching sensitive news content.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca C. MICU & Esther THORSON & Michael ANTECOL, 2009. "In the mood for a commercial break? A model of consumer response to television commercials during sensitive news," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 4(3), Autumn.
  • Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:3:n:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/149.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantin BRATIANU & Georgiana Victoria BALANESCU, 2008. "Vision, mission and corporate values. A comparative analysis of the top 50 U.S. companies," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 3(3), Autumn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:3:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.