Expatriate assignment versus overseas experience: Contrasting models of international human resource development
Expatriate assignment (EA) and overseas experience (OE) models of international career experience are compared. Analysis of recent case study data suggests OE's advantages over EA for people's development and its consequences. In turn, the analysis suggests both human resource management and national policy-making shift from planning toward knowledge-centered approaches.
Volume (Year): 32 (1997)
Issue (Month): 4 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620401/description#description |
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620401/bibliographic|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Oddou, Gary R. & Mendenhall, Mark E., 1991. "Succession planning for the 21st century: How well are we grooming our future business leaders?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 26-34.
- Mendenhall, Mark E. & Oddou, Gary, 1988. "The overseas assignment: A practical look," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 78-84.
- Meg G Birdseye & John S Hill, 1995. "Individual, Organizational/Work and Environmental Influences on Expatriate Turnover Tendencies: An Empirical Study," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 787-813, December.
- Michael G Harvey, 1989. "Repatriation of Corporate Executives: An Empirical Study," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 131-144, March.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worbus:v:32:y:1997:i:4:p:351-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.