IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v174y2025ics0967070x25003981.html

Coordinating connected practices: A social practice perspective on sustainable commuting

Author

Listed:
  • Bøyum, Live
  • Southerton, Dale
  • Tangeland, Torvald

Abstract

The reliance on cars for everyday mobility creates a significant barrier to reducing transport emissions, and existing policy measures have been inadequate in promoting sufficient sustainable private mobility. Drawing on social practice theory, and with parallels to the concept of trip chaining, this article argues that the gap between current policy measures and sustainable mobility stems from neglecting the coordination of connected practices. Using survey data on commuting practices in Oslo, designed to focus on practice connections, we employ logistic regression analysis to identify connections between commuting and other everyday practices. Our findings reveal that commuting practices are positioned within a nexus of coordinated practices embedded in material and spatial-temporal arrangements. Specifically, commuting practices connected with shopping, childcare, and leisure activities foster car dependencies. Material and spatial-temporal arrangements of different work practices foster car dependency for the work commute: those working shift hours, that needed to transport work equipment, and who had work tasks across multiple geographical locations were more dependent on commuting by car. The results suggest that car commuting offers greater scope for negotiating the coordination of connected practices. We discuss the implications of our findings for policy approaches for sustainable mobility, arguing that cross-sectoral policy initiatives focused on the ways in which practice connections are coordinated are necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Bøyum, Live & Southerton, Dale & Tangeland, Torvald, 2025. "Coordinating connected practices: A social practice perspective on sustainable commuting," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003981
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003981
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103855?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chai, Andreas & Bradley, Graham & Lo, Alex & Reser, Joseph, 2015. "What time to adapt? The role of discretionary time in sustaining the climate change value–action gap," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 95-107.
    2. Spurling, Nicola, 2020. "Parking futures: The relationship between parking space, everyday life and travel demand in the UK," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Jennifer L. Kent, 2022. "The use of practice theory in transport research," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 222-244, March.
    4. Frank Primerano & Michael Taylor & Ladda Pitaksringkarn & Peter Tisato, 2008. "Defining and understanding trip chaining behaviour," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-72, January.
    5. Mirijam Mock, 2023. "Making and breaking links: the transformative potential of shared mobility from a practice theories perspective," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 374-390, May.
    6. Cass, Noel & Faulconbridge, James, 2016. "Commuting practices: New insights into modal shift from theories of social practice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Daisy, Naznin Sultana & Millward, Hugh & Liu, Lei, 2018. "Trip chaining and tour mode choice of non-workers grouped by daily activity patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 150-162.
    8. Camilleri, Rosalie & Attard, Maria & Hickman, Robin, 2022. "Understanding barriers to modal shift in Malta: A practice-theoretical perspective of everyday mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Huang, Yuqiao & Gao, Linjie & Ni, Anning & Liu, Xiaoning, 2021. "Analysis of travel mode choice and trip chain pattern relationships based on multi-day GPS data: A case study in Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Köhler, Jonathan & Turnheim, Bruno & Hodson, Mike, 2020. "Low carbon transitions pathways in mobility: Applying the MLP in a combined case study and simulation bridging analysis of passenger transport in the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Ye, Xin & Pendyala, Ram M. & Gottardi, Giovanni, 2007. "An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 96-113, January.
    12. Mattioli, Giulio & Anable, Jillian & Vrotsou, Katerina, 2016. "Car dependent practices: Findings from a sequence pattern mining study of UK time use data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 56-72.
    13. Dong Lin & Andrew Allan & Jianqiang Cui, 2015. "The impacts of urban spatial structure and socio-economic factors on patterns of commuting: a review," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 238-255, July.
    14. Melina Stein & Luca Nitschke & Laura Trost & Ansgar Dirschauer & Jutta Deffner, 2022. "Impacts of Commuting Practices on Social Sustainability and Sustainable Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maeder, Stefanie & Stauffacher, Michael & Knaus, Florian, 2023. "Zooming in and out on everyday mobility practices in a rural, mountainous area of Switzerland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Kevin Maréchal, 2018. "Recasting the understanding of habits for behaviour-oriented policies in transportation," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/270475, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Harsh Shah & Andre L. Carrel & Huyen T. K. Le, 2024. "Impacts of teleworking and online shopping on travel: a tour-based analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 99-127, February.
    4. Schneider, Paul R., 2023. "From elements to policies: A Shovian social practice perspective on pathways to facilitate daily E-bike commuting," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 36-45.
    5. Sunio, Varsolo & Fillone, Alexis & Abad, Raymund Paolo & Rivera, Joyce & Guillen, Marie Danielle, 2023. "Why does demand-based transport planning persist? Insights from social practice theory," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Bautista-Hernández, Dorian Antonio, 2022. "Individual, household, and urban form determinants of trip chaining of non-work travel in México City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Kevin Marechal, 2018. "Recasting the Understanding of Habits for Behaviour-Oriented Policies in Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Wan, Li & Tang, Junqing & Wang, Lihua & Schooling, Jennifer, 2021. "Understanding non-commuting travel demand of car commuters – Insights from ANPR trip chain data in Cambridge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 76-87.
    9. João De Abreu e Silva, 2018. "The Effects of Land-Use Patterns on Home-Based Tour Complexity and Total Distances Traveled: A Path Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Budnitz, Hannah & Jaskólski, Marek & Knapskog, Marianne & Lis-Plesińska, Aleksandra & Schmidt, Filip & Szymanowski, Rafał & der Craats, Jasmijn van & Schwanen, Tim, 2025. "Multi-level governance and modal thinking: Tensions in electric mobility transitions in European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 63-72.
    11. Paula Quentin & Jost Buscher & Thomas Eltner, 2023. "Transport Planning beyond Infrastructural Change: An Empirical Analysis of Transport Planning Practices in the Rhine-Main Region in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Florian Schneider & Danique Ton & Lara-Britt Zomer & Winnie Daamen & Dorine Duives & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2021. "Trip chain complexity: a comparison among latent classes of daily mobility patterns," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 953-975, April.
    13. Adsule, Poonam & Manoj, M., 2025. "A stated choice study to assess charging and travel decisions of electric car users considering car attributes and trip chaining complexity – Case New Delhi, India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Michael Duncan, 2016. "How much can trip chaining reduce VMT? A simplified method," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 643-659, July.
    15. Huwe, Vera, 2021. "Whose streets? Justice in transport decarbonization and gender," ifso working paper series 13, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    16. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T. PhD, 2024. "Is Micromobility Being Used in Place of Car Trips in Daily Travel (or “Trip Chains”)?," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2r66k788, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Camilleri, Rosalie & Attard, Maria & Hickman, Robin, 2022. "Understanding barriers to modal shift in Malta: A practice-theoretical perspective of everyday mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    18. Van Eenoo, Eva & Boussauw, Kobe, 2023. "“That's not feasible without a car”: An exploration of car-dependent practices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Brand, C. & Marsden, G. & Anable, J.L. & Dixon, J. & Barrett, J., 2025. "Achieving deep transport energy demand reductions in the United Kingdom," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    20. Günter Wallner & Simone Kriglstein & Edward Chung & Syeed Anta Kashfi, 2018. "Visualisation of trip chaining behaviour and mode choice using household travel survey data," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 427-453, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.