IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v192y2025ics0965856424004117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The pandemic is over but riders still fear infection − An extended behavioural model explaining post-pandemic transit avoidance related to perceived infection fear

Author

Listed:
  • Sarker, Rumana
  • Currie, Graham
  • Reynolds, James

Abstract

In 2023, transit ridership in most global cities is still below pre-COVID levels. While transit avoidance due to perceived infection fear is a key issue affecting patronage recovery, behavioural models to explain post-pandemic transit use and perceived infection fear are very limited and have not been widely adopted in research. This paper develops an extended theoretical model of transit avoidance from perceived infection fear that integrates Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) with normative influences; namely personal norm and social norm, as well as a measure of infection anxiety. This extended model is measured with a structural equation model (SEM) using data collected from a large online survey in Melbourne, Australia. Additionally, the mediating effects of personal norm, social influence and infection anxiety on transit avoidance is explored and the impact of home relocation is analysed. Results show that higher protection motivation is strongly related to post-COVID transit avoidance. Moreover, personal norm is a stronger predictor of protection motivation compared to threat appraisal and coping appraisal. Infection anxiety also has a significant positive relationship with protection motivation, suggesting that perceived infection fear is still affecting transit avoidance. Comparing the model results, it is evident that while the conventional PMT is effective in predicting long-term transit avoidance, the extended PMT model shows a better goodness-of-fit and explanatory power. Therefore, the extended PMT model developed for this study provides a deeper understanding of the relationships between protection motivation and post-COVID transit avoidance. Several implications for research and practice are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarker, Rumana & Currie, Graham & Reynolds, James, 2025. "The pandemic is over but riders still fear infection − An extended behavioural model explaining post-pandemic transit avoidance related to perceived infection fear," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0965856424004117
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004117
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0965856424004117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.