IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v48y2024i10s0308596124001605.html

Why do users perceive digital platforms as indispensable to their lives?: A study on KakaoTalk in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Jaeyoung
  • Kim, Seongcheol

Abstract

Contemporary daily life heavily relies on a few dominant digital platforms. Despite their pervasive integration into users’ daily routines, scholarly research has primarily focused on assessing the utility of digital platforms rather than on understanding why users perceive them as indispensable. To address this gap, we developed a structural model to examine the factors influencing users’ perceptions of digital platform indispensability, specifically focusing on perceived benefits, perceived risks, and platform habits. We also explored how platform characteristics impact these factors. This study targeted regular KakaoTalk users who utilize multiple Kakao services, given its dominant role in the Korean market. We collected 208 valid responses through an online survey in Korea and analyzed the data using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results show that users’ perceived benefits and platform habits strongly contribute to perceived digital platform indispensability, while perceived risks have an insignificant impact. Furthermore, platform characteristics such as comprehensiveness and sociability positively influence perceived benefits and platform habits. This study introduces the concept of indispensability in digital platform research and highlights a dual pathway of perceived benefits and platform habits, offering strategic insights for platform providers, regulatory considerations for policymakers, and practical advice for users.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Jaeyoung & Kim, Seongcheol, 2024. "Why do users perceive digital platforms as indispensable to their lives?: A study on KakaoTalk in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:48:y:2024:i:10:s0308596124001605
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596124001605
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ha, Seungyeon & Park, Yujun & Kim, Jongpyo & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Research trends of digital platforms: A survey of the literature from 2018 to 2021," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).
    2. Afilipoaie, Adelaida & Donders, Karen & Ballon, Pieter, 2022. "The European Commission's approach to mergers involving software-based platforms: Towards a better understanding of platform power," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    3. Jenny Preece, 2001. "Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 347-356.
    4. Kevin Boudreau, 2010. "Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(10), pages 1849-1872, October.
    5. Justus Haucap & Ulrich Heimeshoff, 2014. "Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 49-61, February.
    6. Igbaria, M, 1993. "User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 73-90, January.
    7. Carliss Y. Baldwin & C. Jason Woodard, 2009. "The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View," Chapters, in: Annabelle Gawer (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    9. Peter, J Paul & Tarpey, Lawrence X, Sr, 1975. "A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(1), pages 29-37, June.
    10. Ron Adner & Phanish Puranam & Feng Zhu, 2019. "What Is Different About Digital Strategy? From Quantitative to Qualitative Change," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 253-261, December.
    11. Yongrok Choi & Hua Wen & Ming Chen & Fan Yang, 2021. "Sustainable Determinants Influencing Habit Formation among Mobile Short-Video Platform Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 268-283.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jang, Chaeyun & Kim, Seongcheol, 2026. "Factors influencing the export of cultural and artistic copyright in the Korean media industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    2. Ahn, Jungyong & Kim, Seongcheol, 2025. "Do digital platform's unethical behaviors influence users' trust and intention to use alternative platforms?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Dyck, Marc & Lüttgens, Dirk & Diener, Kathleen & Piller, Frank & Pollok, Patrick, 2024. "From product to platform: How incumbents' assumptions and choices shape their platform strategy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    2. Hyuck David Chung & Yue Maggie Zhou & Sendil Ethiraj, 2024. "Platform Governance in the Presence of Within-Complementor Interdependencies: Evidence from the Rideshare Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 799-814, February.
    3. Schmück, Kilian & Schückes, Magnus & Gutmann, Tobias & Gassmann, Oliver, 2025. "Less trust, more truth: Implications and design choices for business models and platform ecosystems in the age of Web3," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Christian Bartelheimer, Philipp zur Heiden, Hedda Lüttenberg, Daniel Beverungen, 2021. "Systematizing the Lexicon of Platforms in Information Systems: A Data-Driven Study," Working Papers Dissertations 79, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    5. Mendieta-Aragón, Adrián & Rodríguez-Fernández, Laura & Navío-Marco, Julio, 2025. "Tourism usage of digital collaborative economy platforms in Europe: Situation, behaviours, and implications for the digital policies," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    6. Teo, Thompson S. H. & Lim, Vivien K. G. & Lai, Raye Y. C., 1999. "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 25-37, February.
    7. repec:dgr:rugsom:04f04 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    9. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis & Vallderama-Venegas, E, 2020. "Platforms as service ecosystems: lessons from social media," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101474, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    11. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J., 1995. "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 587-605, December.
    12. Yali Zhang & Haixin Zhang & Zhaojun Yang & Jun Sun & Chrissie Diane Tan, 2019. "Snowball Effect of User Participation in Online Environmental Communities: Elaboration Likelihood under Social Influence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Mauricio S. Featherman & Nick Hajli, 2016. "Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 251-269, December.
    14. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    15. Frambach, Ruud T. & Schillewaert, Niels, 2002. "Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-176, February.
    16. Erika Lázár & Krisztián Szűcs, 2024. "Measuring Customer Experience in Mobile Apps: A Systematic Literature Review," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 36(2), pages 247-266.
    17. Elizabeth J. Altman & Mary Tripsas, 2013. "Product to Platform Transitions: Organizational Identity Implications," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-045, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2014.
    18. Mosterd, Lars & Sobota, Vladimir C.M. & van de Kaa, Geerten & Ding, Aaron Yi & de Reuver, Mark, 2021. "Context dependent trade-offs around platform-to-platform openness: The case of the Internet of Things," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Yuzong Zhao & Hui Wang & Zhen Guo & Mingli Huang & Yongtao Pan & Yongrui Guo, 2022. "Online Reservation Intention of Tourist Attractions in the COVID-19 Context: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Michael G. Jacobides & Stefano Brusoni & Francois Candelon, 2021. "The Evolutionary Dynamics of the Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 412-435, December.
    21. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:48:y:2024:i:10:s0308596124001605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.