IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v49y2025i7s030859612500093x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do digital platform's unethical behaviors influence users' trust and intention to use alternative platforms?

Author

Listed:
  • Ahn, Jungyong
  • Kim, Seongcheol

Abstract

This study elucidates factors associated with consumers' continued engagement with digital platforms despite declining trust related to unethical behavior. The influence of platforms' unethical behavior on consumers' trust and their intention to use alternative platforms were assessed using a survey. Unethical behavior by CEOs or management was found to negatively affect consumer trust in platforms, with CEO misconduct exerting a more pronounced negative effect. Switching costs moderated trust's influence on alternative platform usage intentions, with higher perceived learning and relationship costs weakening the negative effect of consumer trust on alternative platform usage intentions. Theoretical significance was underscored by introducing switching costs as a potential moderator between consumer trust and alternative platform usage intentions. Furthermore, the significance of effectively managing learning and relationship switching costs was highlighted. This study offers practical implications and indicates that failure to manage these costs may result in consumers switching to competitors due to unethical behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahn, Jungyong & Kim, Seongcheol, 2025. "Do digital platform's unethical behaviors influence users' trust and intention to use alternative platforms?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:49:y:2025:i:7:s030859612500093x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030859612500093X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102996?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:49:y:2025:i:7:s030859612500093x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.