IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v83y2025ics0160791x25001733.html

Reframing the digital divide: From barriers of internet non-use to gradients of use — Case study of a Southern U.S. city

Author

Listed:
  • Anaraky, Reza Ghaiumy
  • Alsoubai, Ashwaq
  • Hanebutt, Rachel A.
  • Nov, Oded
  • Wisniewski, Pamela J.

Abstract

Prior studies on the digital divide have focused on different aspects of digital inequity but have yet to develop a cohesive framework to methodologically examine the digital divide at multiple levels. Recognizing the need for a more integrated approach, our work first synthesizes three levels of the digital divide into a cohesive framework ranging from non-use to gradients of use and maps these dimensions to socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, race) to identify digital inequities. Second, we demonstrate the applicability of our framework by operationalizing each level using a novel statistical approach to create profiles of internet non-users and users based on the dimensions of divide. Finally, we present a case study based on survey responses from 2186 adults, primarily from underserved urban communities in Nashville, a large Southeastern U.S. city, to show how the empirical results from this approach can inform actionable interventions and policy changes that promote digital inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Anaraky, Reza Ghaiumy & Alsoubai, Ashwaq & Hanebutt, Rachel A. & Nov, Oded & Wisniewski, Pamela J., 2025. "Reframing the digital divide: From barriers of internet non-use to gradients of use — Case study of a Southern U.S. city," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25001733
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001733
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gallardo, Roberto & Whitacre, Brian, 2024. "An unexpected digital divide? A look at internet speeds and socioeconomic groups," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6).
    2. Lythreatis, Sophie & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2022. "The digital divide: A review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Sadowski, Bert M., 2017. "Advanced users and the adoption of high speed broadband: Results of a living lab study in the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    5. Eaton, Jonathan & Kortum, Samuel, 1999. "International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 40(3), pages 537-570, August.
    6. Mohammad Afshar Ali & Khorshed Alam & Brad Taylor, 2020. "Do social exclusion and remoteness explain the digital divide in Australia? Evidence from a panel data estimation approach," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 643-659, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adina Cocu & Emilia Pecheanu & Ioan Susnea & Sandra Dingli & Adrian Istrate & Cornelia Tudorie, 2025. "Technology-Enabled Learning for Green and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Education," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, February.
    2. Zhu, Yifeng & Li, Qinghai, 2025. "Impact of the three digital divides on residents’ commercial insurance purchase behavior: An empirical study based in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Maria Grazia Diana & Maria Lidia Mascia & Łukasz Tomczyk & Maria Pietronilla Penna, 2025. "The Digital Divide and the Elderly: How Urban and Rural Realities Shape Well-Being and Social Inclusion in the Sardinian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Zeng, Yuan & Yang, Yusen & Wang, Chun & Zou, Jianke, 2025. "Exploring the digital divide–poverty link: Roles of education and family dependency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PC).
    5. Qiu, Jiuyun & Cheng, Lei & Hu, Qiwen & Wang, Peigang, 2025. "How digital and social isolation drive frailty transitions in middle-aged and elderly adults populations: a seven-year multicohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    6. Seong-Sang Lee & Yeonbae Kim, 2009. "The Impact of Efficiency Parameters on Firms Innovative Activities: Evidence from Korean Firm-level data," TEMEP Discussion Papers 200924, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Nov 2009.
    7. Wu, Mingran & Zhao, Min & Wu, Zhaodan, 2019. "Evaluation of development level and economic contribution ratio of science and technology innovation in eastern China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Krzysztof Klincewicz & Szymon Szumiał, 2022. "Successful patenting—not only how, but with whom: the importance of patent attorneys," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5111-5137, September.
    9. Crafts, Nicholas & Toniolo, Gianni, 2008. "European Economic Growth, 1950-2005: An Overview," CEPR Discussion Papers 6863, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    10. Lythreatis, Sophie & Acikgoz, Fulya & Yassine, Noura, 2026. "Artificial intelligence in humanitarian aid: A review and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Ponzoa, José M. & Gómez, Andrés & Mas, José M., 2023. "EU27 and USA institutions in the digital ecosystem: Proposal for a digital presence measurement index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Alessandri, Enrico, 2023. "Identifying technological trajectories in the mining sector using patent citation networks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Giammario Impullitti, 2007. "International Schumpeterian Competition and Optimal R&D subsidies," Economics Working Papers ECO2007/55, European University Institute.
    14. Luo, Peikun & Chen, Yongqing & Shan, Donglu & Wang, Pengcheng, 2025. "Internet use, social capital and high-quality employment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Martin Andersson & Sara Johansson & Hans Lööf, 2012. "Firm Performance and International Trade – Evidence from a Small Open Economy," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Roger R. Stough (ed.), The Regional Economics of Knowledge and Talent, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Krammer, Marius Sorin, 2008. "International R&D spillovers in transition countries: the impact of trade and foreign direct investment," Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers 446, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    17. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2013. "Globalization Localized Technological Change and the Knowledge Economy," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201325, University of Turin.
    18. Wolfgang Keller & Stephen R. Yeaple, 2009. "Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-Level Evidence from the United States," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(4), pages 821-831, November.
    19. Thomas Sampson, 2023. "Technology Gaps, Trade, and Income," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(2), pages 472-513, February.
    20. Dominique Guellec & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2004. "From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 66(3), pages 353-378, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25001733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.