IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v62y2020ics0160791x20301986.html

The use of social media and perceptions of corruption within the Jordanian political elite

Author

Listed:
  • Al-Hussein, Khalid

Abstract

This paper examines the use of social media by Jordanian political elites impacting on issues relating to political decision-making and corruption. Motives of political participation are studied, scrutinizing the relationship between social media and activity, and political awareness and communication within a selected sample. Adopting Jürgen Habermas’ public sphere theory, the study addresses social communication as a core area of non-institutional interaction which is more prevalent than institutional political activities. An intentional sampling of 206 Jordanian elite, are surveyed to determine the role that social media played in providing information relating to corruption in Jordan. A comprehensive inventory method was used, and a questionnaire was analysed using SPSS, revealing a social media platform for exchange of opinions from Jordanian political hierarchy and public. Therein an illusory gap is bridged between elite and commoner highlighting issues including corruption, proving an essential tool in the fight against corruptive intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Al-Hussein, Khalid, 2020. "The use of social media and perceptions of corruption within the Jordanian political elite," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x20301986
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X20301986
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brunetti, Aymo & Weder, Beatrice, 2003. "A free press is bad news for corruption," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(7-8), pages 1801-1824, August.
    2. Jha, Chandan Kumar & Sarangi, Sudipta, 2017. "Does social media reduce corruption?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 60-71.
    3. Alma Tasevska, 2019. "The Issue of the Didactic Aspect of the Activity of Play," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 6, ejser_v6_.
    4. Taufiq Ahmad & Aima Alvi & Muhammad Ittefaq, 2019. "The Use of Social Media on Political Participation Among University Students: An Analysis of Survey Results From Rural Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zagidullin, Marat & Aziz, Nergis & Kozhakhmet, Sanat, 2021. "Government policies and attitudes to social media use among users in Turkey: The role of awareness of policies, political involvement, online trust, and party identification," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Lian, Ying & Dong, Xuefan, 2021. "Exploring social media usage in improving public perception on workplace violence against healthcare workers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bjørnskov, Christian & Freytag, Andreas & Gutmann, Jerg, 2022. "Coups and the dynamics of media freedom," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. João Martins & Linda Veiga & Bruno Fernandes, 2021. "Does electronic government deter corruption? Evidence from across the world," NIPE Working Papers 02/2021, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    3. Ali, Merima & Fjeldstad, Odd‐Helge & Shifa, Abdulaziz B., 2020. "European colonization and the corruption of local elites: The case of chiefs in Africa," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 80-100.
    4. Jha, Chandan Kumar & Panda, Bibhudutta & Sahu, Santosh Kumar, 2022. "Institutions and conflict," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. James Danowski & Aaron van Klyton & Tai-Quan Winson Peng & Siyuan Ma & Raphaël Nkakleu & Altante Désirée Biboum, 2023. "Information and communications technology development, interorganizational networks, and public sector corruption in Africa," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3285-3304, August.
    6. Jha, Chandan Kumar, 2023. "Condoning corruption: Who votes for corrupt political parties?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 74-88.
    7. João Martins & Linda Veiga & Bruno Fernandes, 2023. "Are electronic government innovations helpful to deter corruption? Evidence from across the world," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 1177-1203, November.
    8. Saranjam Baig & Cuneyt Yenigun & Khalid Mehmood Alam, 2022. "Political Capacity and Corruption Nexus: Re-Examining Evidence for Developing Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Aaron Soans & Masato Abe, 2015. "Bribery, Corruption and Bureaucratic Hassle: Evidence from Myanmar," ARTNeT Working Papers 152, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    10. Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar & Pensiero, Domenico & Velayutham, Eswaran, 2021. "Corruption risk and stock market effects: Evidence from the defence industry," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Chowdhury, Shyamal K., 2004. "The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: an empirical test," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 93-101, October.
    12. Huther, Jeff & Shah, Anwar, 2000. "Anti-corruption policies and programs : a framework for evaluation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2501, The World Bank.
    13. Pal Sudeshna, 2011. "Media Freedom and Socio-Political Instability," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Bin Dong & Benno Torgler, 2010. "The Causes of Corruption: Evidence from China," Working Papers 2010.72, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    15. Canh Phuc Nguyen & Nadia Doytch & Christophe Schinckus & Thanh Dinh Su, 2024. "Mobile and internet usage, institutions and the trade balance: Evidence from African countries," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2230-2264, April.
    16. Graziella Bonanno & Lucia Errico & Nadia Fiorino & Roberto Ricciuti, 2025. "The impact of government size on corruption: A meta‐regression analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1727-1757, September.
    17. Massimo Buscema & Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli, 2016. "Multidimensional Similarities at a Global Scale: An Approach to Mapping Open Society Orientations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1239-1258, September.
    18. Lahiri, Bidisha & Ali, Haider, 2022. "Inspections, informal payments and tax payments by firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).
    19. Yan Leung Cheung & P. Raghavendra Rau & Aris Stouraitis, 2012. "How much do firms pay as bribes and what benefits do they get? Evidence from corruption cases worldwide," NBER Working Papers 17981, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. López-Cazar, Ibeth & Papyrakis, Elissaios & Pellegrini, Lorenzo, 2021. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and corruption in Latin America: Evidence from Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x20301986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.