IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v175y2022ics0040162521008453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social network multiple-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating unmanned ground delivery vehicles under the Pythagorean fuzzy environment

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng, Shouzhen
  • Zhang, Na
  • Zhang, Chonghui
  • Su, Weihua
  • Carlos, Llopis-Albert

Abstract

With the rapid development of instant delivery, the shrinking labor population and prevailing contact-free economy, companies have launched unmanned ground delivery vehicles (UGDVs) to replace human distribution with machines. To meet the requirements for selecting UGDVs and achieve better applications in community delivery, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework, combining the self-confidence aggregation approach and social trust network, is proposed in this study. Based on the internal characteristics of UGDVs, a multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation system for UGDVs is constructed. Then, a trust propagation and aggregation mechanism to yield expert weights based on a social trust network is suggested. Further, a self-confidence Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operator is proposed to enhance the credibility of the decision results and compensate for the defects of existing methods. Finally, a practical case is considered to demonstrate the complete process of the MCDM model and to conduct a comparative analysis and sensitivity analysis of the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng, Shouzhen & Zhang, Na & Zhang, Chonghui & Su, Weihua & Carlos, Llopis-Albert, 2022. "Social network multiple-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating unmanned ground delivery vehicles under the Pythagorean fuzzy environment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:175:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521008453
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521008453
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Imbert, Enrica & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A Socio-economic Indicator for EoL Strategies for Bio-based Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Thomas L. Saaty, 1987. "Risk—Its Priority and Probability: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 159-172, June.
    3. Guy Desaulniers & Fausto Errico & Stefan Irnich & Michael Schneider, 2016. "Exact Algorithms for Electric Vehicle-Routing Problems with Time Windows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1388-1405, December.
    4. Ghenai, Chaouki & Albawab, Mona & Bettayeb, Maamar, 2020. "Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 580-597.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Weidinger, Felix, 2018. "Scheduling last-mile deliveries with truck-based autonomous robots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1085-1099.
    6. Lu, Xiaonong & Zhang, Qiang & Peng, Zhanglin & Shao, Zhen & Song, Hao & Wang, Wanying, 2020. "Charging and relocating optimization for electric vehicle car-sharing: An event-based strategy improvement approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    7. Mustafa Hamurcu & Tamer Eren & Ming-Sheng Liu, 2020. "Selection of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles by Using Multicriteria Decision-Making for Defence," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-11, June.
    8. Boysen, Nils & Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Weidinger, Felix, 2018. "Scheduling last-mile deliveries with truck-based autonomous robots," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 126189, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Hannan, M.A. & Hoque, M.M. & Mohamed, A. & Ayob, A., 2017. "Review of energy storage systems for electric vehicle applications: Issues and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 771-789.
    10. Lemardelé, Clément & Estrada, Miquel & Pagès, Laia & Bachofner, Mónika, 2021. "Potentialities of drones and ground autonomous delivery devices for last-mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    12. Harish Garg, 2017. "Confidence levels based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its application to decision-making process," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 546-571, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kraus, Sascha & Kumar, Satish & Lim, Weng Marc & Kaur, Jaspreet & Sharma, Anuj & Schiavone, Francesco, 2023. "From moon landing to metaverse: Tracing the evolution of Technological Forecasting and Social Change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Zeng, Shouzhen & Zhou, Jiamin & Zhang, Chonghui & Merigó, José M., 2022. "Intuitionistic fuzzy social network hybrid MCDM model for an assessment of digital reforms of manufacturing industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Rubio, Francisco & Llopis-Albert, Carlos & Besa, Antonio José, 2023. "Optimal allocation of energy sources in hydrogen production for sustainable deployment of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Yan Pan & Yanzhe Li & Shouzhen Zeng & Junfang Hu & Kifayat Ullah, 2022. "Green Recycling Supplier Selection of Shared Bicycles: Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Hybrid Weighted Methods Based on Self-Confidence Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Wu, Qun & Liu, Xinwang & Qin, Jindong & Zhou, Ligang & Mardani, Abbas & Deveci, Muhammet, 2022. "An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization model for socially responsible portfolio selection," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Zhang, Chonghui & Jiang, Nanyue & Su, Tiantian & Chen, Ji & Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2022. "Spreading knowledge and technology: Research efficiency at universities based on the three-stage MCDM-NRSDEA method with bootstrapping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Alfandari, Laurent & Ljubić, Ivana & De Melo da Silva, Marcos, 2022. "A tailored Benders decomposition approach for last-mile delivery with autonomous robots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 510-525.
    3. Heimfarth, Andreas & Ostermeier, Manuel & Hübner, Alexander, 2022. "A mixed truck and robot delivery approach for the daily supply of customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 401-421.
    4. Themistoklis Stamadianos & Nikolaos A. Kyriakakis & Magdalene Marinaki & Yannis Marinakis, 2023. "Routing Problems with Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Review and Potential for Future Research," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-34, June.
    5. Mishra, Sabyasachee & Sharma, Ishant & Pani, Agnivesh, 2023. "Analyzing autonomous delivery acceptance in food deserts based on shopping travel patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Bray, Garrett & Cebon, David, 2022. "Operational speed strategy opportunities for autonomous trucking on highways," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 75-94.
    7. Seyed Morteza Hatefi & Hamideh Asadi & Gholamreza Shams & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Zenonas Turskis, 2021. "Model for the Sustainable Material Selection by Applying Integrated Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Dumez, Dorian & Lehuédé, Fabien & Péton, Olivier, 2021. "A large neighborhood search approach to the vehicle routing problem with delivery options," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 103-132.
    9. Liu, Dan & Yan, Pengyu & Pu, Ziyuan & Wang, Yinhai & Kaisar, Evangelos I., 2021. "Hybrid artificial immune algorithm for optimizing a Van-Robot E-grocery delivery system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Baldi, Mauro Maria & Manerba, Daniele & Perboli, Guido & Tadei, Roberto, 2019. "A Generalized Bin Packing Problem for parcel delivery in last-mile logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 990-999.
    11. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Empirical investigation and validation of sustainability indicators for the assessment of energy sources in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Liu, Dan & Kaisar, Evangelos I. & Yang, Yang & Yan, Pengyu, 2022. "Physical Internet-enabled E-grocery delivery Network:A load-dependent two-echelon vehicle routing problem with mixed vehicles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    13. Thiel, Marko & Tjaden, Sandra & Schrick, Manuel & Rosenberger, Kerstin & Grote, Matthias, 2021. "Requirements for robots in combined passenger/freight transport," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 195-215, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    14. Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Boysen, Nils, 2020. "Optimizing the changing locations of mobile parcel lockers in last-mile distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1077-1094.
    15. Wang, Kai & Pesch, Erwin & Kress, Dominik & Fridman, Ilia & Boysen, Nils, 2022. "The Piggyback Transportation Problem: Transporting drones launched from a flying warehouse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 504-519.
    16. Katarzyna Kolasińska-Morawska & Łukasz Sułkowski & Piotr Buła & Marta Brzozowska & Paweł Morawski, 2022. "Smart Logistics—Sustainable Technological Innovations in Customer Service at the Last-Mile Stage: The Polish Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-33, September.
    17. Balali, Amirhossein & Yunusa-Kaltungo, Akilu & Edwards, Rodger, 2023. "A systematic review of passive energy consumption optimisation strategy selection for buildings through multiple criteria decision-making techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Chen, Cheng & Demir, Emrah & Huang, Yuan & Qiu, Rongzu, 2021. "The adoption of self-driving delivery robots in last mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Liu, Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Dong, Jingxin, 2021. "Unmanned vehicle distribution capacity sharing with demand surge under option contracts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Lemardelé, Clément & Estrada, Miquel & Pagès, Laia & Bachofner, Mónika, 2021. "Potentialities of drones and ground autonomous delivery devices for last-mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:175:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521008453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.