IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v131y2018icp49-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Daim, Tugrul U.
  • Yoon, Byung-Sung
  • Lindenberg, John
  • Grizzi, Robert
  • Estep, Judith
  • Oliver, Terry

Abstract

This paper presents an application of a strategic technology management tool in the power sector. Technology Development Envelope is an extension of hierarchical decision modeling and Analytical Hierarchy Process into the future. The process yields multiple paths for technology development enabling organizations to build roadmaps depicting their strategies. The focus of this paper is robotics technologies and their applications in the power sector. As robotics technologies advance, they replace humans in very critical areas such as maintenance of transmission lines or hydro dams as well as operations in nuclear power plants. A decision model was developed and quantified through this study. It is validated with a case study from Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) reflecting their priorities. The model establishes a framework that any other organization can adopt and use to evaluate any emerging robotics technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Daim, Tugrul U. & Yoon, Byung-Sung & Lindenberg, John & Grizzi, Robert & Estep, Judith & Oliver, Terry, 2018. "Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 49-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:131:y:2018:i:c:p:49-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517307734
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cinar, Didem & Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Daim, Tugrul, 2010. "Development of future energy scenarios with intelligent algorithms: Case of hydro in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1724-1729.
    2. Karvonen, Matti & Kässi, Tuomo, 2013. "Patent citations as a tool for analysing the early stages of convergence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(6), pages 1094-1107.
    3. Abbasi, Alireza & Altmann, Jörn & Hossain, Liaquat, 2011. "Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 594-607.
    4. McDowall, Will, 2012. "Technology roadmaps for transition management: The case of hydrogen energy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 530-542.
    5. Lee, Jung Hoon & Phaal, Robert & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2013. "An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 286-306.
    6. Francisco José Acedo & Carmen Barroso & Cristóbal Casanueva & José Luis Galán, 2006. "Co‐Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 957-983, July.
    7. Geum, Youngjung & Lee, HyeonJeong & Lee, Youngjo & Park, Yongtae, 2015. "Development of data-driven technology roadmap considering dependency: An ARM-based technology roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 264-279.
    8. Ávila-Robinson, Alfonso & Miyazaki, Kumiko, 2013. "Dynamics of scientific knowledge bases as proxies for discerning technological emergence — The case of MEMS/NEMS technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(6), pages 1071-1084.
    9. Lee, Jung Hoon & Kim, Hyung-il & Phaal, Robert, 2012. "An analysis of factors improving technology roadmap credibility: A communications theory assessment of roadmapping processes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 263-280.
    10. Kennedy, Elizabeth & Daim, Tugrul U., 2010. "A strategy to assist management in workforce engagement and employee retention in the high tech engineering environment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 468-476, November.
    11. Martin, Hilary & Daim, Tugrul U., 2012. "Technology roadmap development process (TRDP) for the service sector: A conceptual framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 94-105.
    12. N. Gerdsri, 2007. "An Analytical Approach To Building A Technology Development Envelope (Tde) For Roadmapping Of Emerging Technologies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02), pages 121-135.
    13. Toro-Jarrín, Miguel Angel & Ponce-Jaramillo, Idalia Estefania & Güemes-Castorena, David, 2016. "Methodology for the of building process integration of Business Model Canvas and Technological Roadmap," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 213-225.
    14. Hansen, Christoph & Daim, Tugrul & Ernst, Horst & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2016. "The future of rail automation: A scenario-based technology roadmap for the rail automation market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 196-212.
    15. Jeffrey, Henry & Sedgwick, Jonathan & Robinson, Charles, 2013. "Technology roadmaps: An evaluation of their success in the renewable energy sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(5), pages 1015-1027.
    16. Wang, Bing & Kocaoglu, Dundar F. & Daim, Tugrul U. & Yang, Jiting, 2010. "A decision model for energy resource selection in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7130-7141, November.
    17. Paliokaitė, Agnė & Martinaitis, Žilvinas & Sarpong, David, 2016. "Implementing smart specialisation roadmaps in Lithuania: Lost in translation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 143-152.
    18. Bo-Christer Björk & Patrik Welling & Mikael Laakso & Peter Majlender & Turid Hedlund & Guðni Guðnason, 2010. "Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-9, June.
    19. Ying Guo & Xiao Zhou & Alan L. Porter & Douglas K. R. Robinson, 2015. "Tech mining to generate indicators of future national technological competitiveness: Nano-Enhanced Drug Delivery (NEDD) in the US and China," Post-Print hal-01276911, HAL.
    20. Domenico De Stefano & Giuseppe Giordano & Maria Vitale, 2011. "Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1091-1107, August.
    21. Vishnevskiy, Konstantin & Karasev, Oleg & Meissner, Dirk, 2016. "Integrated roadmaps for strategic management and planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 153-166.
    22. Cowan, Kelly & Daim, Tugrul & Anderson, Tim, 2010. "Exploring the impact of technology development and adoption for sustainable hydroelectric power and storage technologies in the Pacific Northwest United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4771-4779.
    23. Sakata, Ichiro & Sasaki, Hajime & Akiyama, Masanori & Sawatani, Yuriko & Shibata, Naoki & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2013. "Bibliometric analysis of service innovation research: Identifying knowledge domain and global network of knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(6), pages 1085-1093.
    24. Vishnevskiy, Konstantin & Karasev, Oleg & Meissner, Dirk, 2015. "Integrated roadmaps and corporate foresight as tools of innovation management: The case of Russian companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 433-443.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coccia, Mario, 2019. "The theory of technological parasitism for the measurement of the evolution of technology and technological forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 289-304.
    2. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & A. Sharma & Nripendra P. Rana & M. Giannakis & P. Goel & Vincent Dutot, 2023. "Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Research Topics, Trends, and Future Directions," Post-Print hal-04292607, HAL.
    3. Garza Ramos, Alejandro & Daim, Tugrul & Gaats, Lukas & Hutmacher, Dietmar W. & Hackenberger, David, 2022. "Technology roadmap for the development of a 3D cell culture workstation for a biomedical industry startup," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Zhang, Yi & Huang, Ying & Porter, Alan L. & Zhang, Guangquan & Lu, Jie, 2019. "Discovering and forecasting interactions in big data research: A learning-enhanced bibliometric study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 795-807.
    5. Kim, Junhan & Geum, Youngjung, 2021. "How to develop data-driven technology roadmaps:The integration of topic modeling and link prediction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Ballestar, María Teresa & Díaz-Chao, Ángel & Sainz, Jorge & Torrent-Sellens, Joan, 2020. "Knowledge, robots and productivity in SMEs: Explaining the second digital wave," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 119-131.
    7. Nazarenko, Anastasia & Vishnevskiy, Konstantin & Meissner, Dirk & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Applying digital technologies in technology roadmapping to overcome individual biased assessments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Katarzyna Halicka, 2020. "Technology Selection Using the TOPSIS Method," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 85-96.
    9. Marek Jemala, 2019. "Problematic Roadmapping for Companies in Less Developed Regions of Slovakia," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Maria Tokareva & Konstantin Vishnevskiy & Anton Zarubin, 2019. "Technology Assessment Of Iot Wireless Network Technologies For The Telecommunication Sector," HSE Working papers WP BRP 94/STI/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Paul Weigel & Manfred Fischedick & Peter Viebahn, 2021. "Holistic Evaluation of Digital Applications in the Energy Sector—Evaluation Framework Development and Application to the Use Case Smart Meter Roll-Out," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    12. Carayannis, Elias G. & Ferreira, João J.M. & Jalali, Marjan S. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F., 2018. "MCDA in knowledge-based economies: Methodological developments and real world applications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-3.
    13. Parolin, Giácomo & McAloone, Tim C. & Pigosso, Daniela C.A., 2024. "How can technology assessment tools support sustainable innovation? A systematic literature review and synthesis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    14. Park, Hyunkyu & Phaal, Rob & Ho, Jae-Yun & O'Sullivan, Eoin, 2020. "Twenty years of technology and strategic roadmapping research: A school of thought perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Chakraborty, Swagata & Nijssen, Edwin J. & Valkenburg, Rianne, 2022. "A systematic review of industry-level applications of technology roadmapping: Evaluation and design propositions for roadmapping practitioners," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Sharma, Mahak & Sehrawat, Rajat & Daim, Tugrul & Shaygan, Amir, 2021. "Technology assessment: Enabling Blockchain in hospitality and tourism sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Kayabay, Kerem & Gökalp, Mert Onuralp & Gökalp, Ebru & Erhan Eren, P. & Koçyiğit, Altan, 2022. "Data science roadmapping: An architectural framework for facilitating transformation towards a data-driven organization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Zhang, Hao & Daim, Tugrul & Zhang, Yunqiu (Peggy), 2021. "Integrating patent analysis into technology roadmapping: A latent dirichlet allocation based technology assessment and roadmapping in the field of Blockchain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Zhu, Lin & Cunningham, Scott W., 2022. "Unveiling the knowledge structure of technological forecasting and social change (1969–2020) through an NMF-based hierarchical topic model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hao & Daim, Tugrul & Zhang, Yunqiu (Peggy), 2021. "Integrating patent analysis into technology roadmapping: A latent dirichlet allocation based technology assessment and roadmapping in the field of Blockchain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Saba Sareminia & Alireza Hasanzadeh & Shaaban Elahi & Gholamali Montazer, 2019. "Developing Technology Roadmapping Combinational Framework by Meta Synthesis Technique," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-36, April.
    3. Park, Hyunkyu & Phaal, Rob & Ho, Jae-Yun & O'Sullivan, Eoin, 2020. "Twenty years of technology and strategic roadmapping research: A school of thought perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Hansen, Christoph & Daim, Tugrul & Ernst, Horst & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2016. "The future of rail automation: A scenario-based technology roadmap for the rail automation market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 196-212.
    5. Nazarenko, Anastasia & Vishnevskiy, Konstantin & Meissner, Dirk & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Applying digital technologies in technology roadmapping to overcome individual biased assessments," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. de Alcantara, Douglas Pedro & Martens, Mauro Luiz, 2019. "Technology Roadmapping (TRM): a systematic review of the literature focusing on models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 127-138.
    7. Yu, Xiang & Zhang, Ben, 2019. "Obtaining advantages from technology revolution: A patent roadmap for competition analysis and strategy planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 273-283.
    8. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2016. "Emerging economies, emerging challenges: Mobilising and capturing value from big data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 167-174.
    9. Chi-Yo Huang & Jih-Jeng Huang & You-Ning Chang & Yen-Chu Lin, 2021. "A Fuzzy-MOP-Based Competence Set Expansion Method for Technology Roadmap Definitions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Garza Ramos, Alejandro & Daim, Tugrul & Gaats, Lukas & Hutmacher, Dietmar W. & Hackenberger, David, 2022. "Technology roadmap for the development of a 3D cell culture workstation for a biomedical industry startup," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Iskin, Ibrahim & Daim, Tugrul & Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Altuntas, Mehmet, 2012. "Exploring renewable energy pricing with analytic network process — Comparing a developed and a developing economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 882-891.
    12. Noh, Heeyong & Kim, Kyuwoong & Song, Young-Keun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2021. "Opportunity-driven technology roadmapping: The case of 5G mobile services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Kim, Junhan & Geum, Youngjung, 2021. "How to develop data-driven technology roadmaps:The integration of topic modeling and link prediction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    14. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2016. "Emerging economies, emerging challenges: Mobilising and capturing value from big data," MPRA Paper 85625, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Etienne Farvaque & Frédéric Gannon, 2018. "Profiling giants: the networks and influence of Buchanan and Tullock," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 277-302, June.
    16. Yuskevich, Ilya & Hein, Andreas Makoto & Amokrane-Ferka, Kahina & Doufene, Abdelkrim & Jankovic, Marija, 2021. "A metamodel of an informational structure for model-based technology roadmapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Bloem da Silveira Junior, Luiz A. & Vasconcellos, Eduardo & Vasconcellos Guedes, Liliana & Guedes, Luis Fernando A. & Costa, Renato Machado, 2018. "Technology roadmapping: A methodological proposition to refine Delphi results," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 194-206.
    18. Cho, Yonghee & Yoon, Seong-Pil & Kim, Karp-Soo, 2016. "An industrial technology roadmap for supporting public R&D planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-12.
    19. Zhou, Xiao & Huang, Lu & Porter, Alan & Vicente-Gomila, Jose M., 2019. "Tracing the system transformations and innovation pathways of an emerging technology: Solid lipid nanoparticles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 785-794.
    20. Alireza Abbasi & Liaquat Hossain & Shahadat Uddin & Kim J. R. Rasmussen, 2011. "Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(2), pages 687-710, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:131:y:2018:i:c:p:49-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.