IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v72y2011i1p39-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: Decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Bossert, Thomas John
  • Mitchell, Andrew David

Abstract

Health sector decentralization has been widely adopted to improve delivery of health services. While many argue that institutional capacities and mechanisms of accountability required to transform decentralized decision-making into improvements in local health systems are lacking, few empirical studies exist which measure or relate together these concepts. Based on research instruments administered to a sample of 91 health sector decision-makers in 17 districts of Pakistan, this study analyzes relationships between three dimensions of decentralization: decentralized authority (referred to as "decision space"), institutional capacities, and accountability to local officials. Composite quantitative indicators of these three dimensions were constructed within four broad health functions (strategic and operational planning, budgeting, human resources management, and service organization/delivery) and on an overall/cross-function basis. Three main findings emerged. First, district-level respondents report varying degrees of each dimension despite being under a single decentralization regime and facing similar rules across provinces. Second, within dimensions of decentralization--particularly decision space and capacities--synergies exist between levels reported by respondents in one function and those reported in other functions (statistically significant coefficients of correlation ranging from [rho] = 0.22 to [rho] = 0.43). Third, synergies exist across dimensions of decentralization, particularly in terms of an overall indicator of institutional capacities (significantly correlated with both overall decision space ([rho] = 0.39) and accountability ([rho] = 0.23)). This study demonstrates that decentralization is a varied experience--with some district-level officials making greater use of decision space than others and that those who do so also tend to have more capacity to make decisions and are held more accountable to elected local officials for such choices. These findings suggest that Pakistan's decentralization policy should focus on synergies among dimensions of decentralization to encouraging more use of de jure decision space, work toward more uniform institutional capacity, and encourage greater accountability to local elected officials.

Suggested Citation

  • Bossert, Thomas John & Mitchell, Andrew David, 2011. "Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: Decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 39-48, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:1:p:39-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(10)00755-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anwar Shah, 2006. "Local Governance in Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7192, December.
    2. Shah, Anwar, 2004. "Fiscal decentralization in developing and transition economies: progress, problems, and the promise," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3282, The World Bank.
    3. Serdar Yilmaz & Varsha Venugopal, 2008. "Local Government Discretion and Accountability in Ethiopia," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0838, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    4. Newell, James Nicholas & Collins, Charles D & Baral, Sushil C & Omar, Maye A & Pande, Shanta B, 2005. "Decentralisation and TB control in Nepal: understanding the views of TB control staff," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 212-227, August.
    5. Homedes, Nuria & Ugalde, Antonio, 2005. "Why neoliberal health reforms have failed in Latin America," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 83-96, January.
    6. Bossert, Thomas, 1998. "Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1513-1527, November.
    7. World Bank, 2004. "Devolution in Pakistan : Annex 1. Recent History," World Bank Publications - Reports 14571, The World Bank Group.
    8. John Akin & Paul Hutchinson & Koleman Strumpf, 2005. "Decentralisation and government provision of public goods: The public health sector in Uganda," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1417-1443.
    9. Khaleghian, Peyvand, 2004. "Decentralization and public services: the case of immunization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 163-183, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Rohregger & Katja Bender & Bethuel Kinuthia & Esther Schüring & Grace Ikua & Nicky Pouw, 2018. "The politics of implementation or why institutional interaction matters: The role of traditional authorities in delivering pro-poor social policies in Kenya," IZNE Working Paper Series 18/2, International Centre for Sustainable Development (IZNE), Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences.
    2. Feldhaus, Isabelle & Chatterjee, Susmita & Clarke-Deelder, Emma & Brenzel, Logan & Resch, Stephen & Bossert, Thomas J., 2023. "Examining decentralization and managerial decision making for child immunization program performance in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    3. Zacharia S. Masanyiwa & Anke Niehof & Catrien J. A. M. Termeer, 2015. "A gendered users′ perspective on decentralized primary health services in rural Tanzania," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 285-306, July.
    4. Park, Sungchul & Lee, Jason & Ikai, Hiroshi & Otsubo, Tetsuya & Imanaka, Yuichi, 2013. "Decentralization and centralization of healthcare resources: Investigating the associations of hospital competition and number of cardiologists per hospital with mortality and resource utilization in ," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 100-109.
    5. Harvy Joy Liwanag & Kaspar Wyss, 2018. "What conditions enable decentralization to improve the health system? Qualitative analysis of perspectives on decision space after 25 years of devolution in the Philippines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Muhammad Arshad & Faisal Abbas & Harald Kächele & Yasir Mehmood & Nasir Mahmood & Klaus Mueller, 2022. "Analyzing the Impact of Government Social Spending, Population Growth and Foreign Remittances on Human Development in Pakistan: Implications for Policy," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(3), pages 1607-1626, June.
    7. Ngwira, Chikosa & Mayhew, Susannah H. & Hutchinson, Eleanor, 2021. "Community-level integration of health services and community health workers’ agency in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    8. Jiménez-Rubio, Dolores & García-Gómez, Pilar, 2017. "Decentralization of health care systems and health outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 69-81.
    9. Smith, Stephanie L., 2014. "Political contexts and maternal health policy: Insights from a comparison of south Indian states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 46-53.
    10. Soto, Victoria Eugenia & Farfan, Maria Isabel & Lorant, Vincent, 2012. "Fiscal decentralisation and infant mortality rate: The Colombian case," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(9), pages 1426-1434.
    11. London, Jonathan D., 2013. "The promises and perils of hospital autonomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 232-240.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khaleghian, Peyvand & Gupta, Monica Das, 2005. "Public management and the essential public health functions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1083-1099, July.
    2. Vargas Bustamante, Arturo, 2010. "The tradeoff between centralized and decentralized health services: Evidence from rural areas in Mexico," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 925-934, September.
    3. Makokha, Racheal Omukhulu, 2017. "Does Decentralization Improve Provision of Health Services? Evidence from Kisumu and Makueni Counties in Kenya," Thesis Commons xef7a, Center for Open Science.
    4. Chunli Shen & Jing Jin & Heng-fu Zou, 2012. "Fiscal Decentralization in China: History, Impact, Challenges and Next Steps," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 13(1), pages 1-51, May.
    5. Ramadhani Kigume & Stephen Maluka, 2019. "Health sector decentralisation in Tanzania: Analysis of decision space in human resources for health management," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1265-1276, October.
    6. World Bank, 2008. "Serbia : Decentralization and Local Service Delivery," World Bank Publications - Reports 8099, The World Bank Group.
    7. Anila Channa & Jean-Paul Faguet, 2016. "Decentralization of Health and Education in Developing Countries: A Quality-Adjusted Review of the Empirical Literature," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 31(2), pages 199-241.
    8. London, Jonathan D., 2013. "The promises and perils of hospital autonomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 232-240.
    9. Yue Dong & Dipanwita Sarkar & Jayanta Sarkar, 2021. "Decentralization and health resource allocation: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," QuBE Working Papers 060, QUT Business School.
    10. World Bank & European Commission & Food and Agriculture Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund & United Nations Development Program & World Health Organization, 2007. "Angola : Public Expenditure Review, Volume 2. Sectoral Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 7648, The World Bank Group.
    11. Feldhaus, Isabelle & Chatterjee, Susmita & Clarke-Deelder, Emma & Brenzel, Logan & Resch, Stephen & Bossert, Thomas J., 2023. "Examining decentralization and managerial decision making for child immunization program performance in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    12. Joseph J. Capuno & Stella A. Quimbo & Aleli D. Kraft & Carlos Antonio R. Tan, Jr., 2012. "The effects of term limits and yardstick competition on local government provision of health insurance and other public services : The Philippine case," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 201201, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
    13. Arturo Vargas Bustamante & Claudio A. Méndez, 2016. "Regulating self-selection into private health insurance in Chile and the United States," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 219-234, July.
    14. María Orduz, 2022. "Effect of educational spending on academic performance under different institutional arrangements," Documentos CEDE 20224, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    15. Ramiro Guerrero & Sergio I. Prada & Dov Chernichovsky, 2014. "La doble descentralización en el sector salud: evaluación y alternativas de política pública," Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo 12019, Fedesarrollo.
    16. Thierry Madiès & Jean-Jacques Dethier, 2012. "Fiscal Competition In Developing Countries: A Survey Of The Theoretical And Empirical Literature," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-31.
    17. Song, Yang, 2013. "Rising Chinese regional income inequality: The role of fiscal decentralization," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 294-309.
    18. International Monetary Fund, 2015. "Mali: Technical Assistance Report - Local Taxation and Decentralization," IMF Staff Country Reports 2015/291, International Monetary Fund.
    19. Ali, Amin Masud & Savoia, Antonio, 2023. "Decentralisation or patronage: What determines government's allocation of development spending in a unitary country? Evidence from Bangladesh," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Kis-Katos, Krisztina & Sjahrir, Bambang Suharnoko, 2017. "The impact of fiscal and political decentralization on local public investment in Indonesia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 344-365.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:1:p:39-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.