IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Do new cohorts of family physicians work less compared to their older predecessors? The evidence from Canada

  • Sarma, Sisira
  • Thind, Amardeep
  • Chu, Man-Kee

Although demographics, cohort, and contextual factors are expected to influence physician supply at the intensive margin, much of the literature has examined the demographics and very limited cohort analysis is undertaken. This paper employs a cross-classified fixed-effects methodology to examine the importance of age, period and cohort, and contextual factors in explaining the declining work hours of Canadian family physicians. We define cohorts with five-year intervals according to year of graduation from medical school. Contrary to the previous literature, we find no evidence of reduced hours of work provided by the new cohorts of physicians. Compared to the 1995-99 cohort, older male cohorts perform similar total hours of work per week except those who graduated in the 1960's while older female cohorts consistently perform fewer total work hours in the range of 3-10Â h per week. Consistent with the literature, it is found that female and older physicians provide fewer hours of work compared to the male and younger counterparts, respectively. Although there has been a decline in total hours of work for all physicians in the range of 2-3Â h per week in each period, we find a large decline in direct patient care hours (about 4-6Â h) and a marginal increase in indirect patient care (about 2-4Â h) over the period. Having children less than 6 years and children aged 6-15 years in the physician's family reduce the work hours of female family physicians by about 7Â h and 3Â h, respectively. A number of other contextual factors influence work hours of physicians in the expected direction.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

Volume (Year): 72 (2011)
Issue (Month): 12 (June)
Pages: 2049-2058

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:12:p:2049-2058
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Postal:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:12:p:2049-2058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.