IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v381y2025ics0277953625006458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doctors as system leaders: medical professionalism and ‘making a stand’

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, Lorelei
  • Armit, Kirsten

Abstract

Regional collaborative networks are an important focus of healthcare policy around the world. Doctors are increasingly taking up roles as ‘system leaders’ in these networks. These roles are seen as important for facilitating collaboration between stakeholders to coordinate services and foster innovation. Drawing from a study of 12 senior medical leaders who have taken on the new role of ‘Chief Medical Officer’ in the Integrated Care Systems in England, we explore how they understand and enact these new system leadership roles. We develop a novel theoretical perspective on medical professionalism as a mode of governance. We contribute original insights on new forms of solidarity and collective action that have important governing mechanisms and effects, such as engaging intrinsic motivation, countering coercive management hierarchies to advance the interests of patients; and ‘making a stand’ on moral issues. Our analysis rebalances the focus on knowledge in the sociology of the professions. The profession remains an important sociological category because professional ethics continue to furnish meaning and guide action. A professional concern for quality, intrinsic motivation, and professional integrity can promote population health and health equity and uphold the quality and safety of patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, Lorelei & Armit, Kirsten, 2025. "Doctors as system leaders: medical professionalism and ‘making a stand’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006458
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625006458
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.