IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v311y2022ics0277953622006104.html

Essential for society but not equally deserving of preferential treatment? A discrete-choice experiment regarding COVID-19 healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Heusler, Anna
  • Osiander, Christopher
  • Schmidtke, Julia

Abstract

Workers' risks of contracting COVID-19 vary according to individual behaviors, occupations and job characteristics. Therefore, persons may consider different groups of workers more or less deserving of COVID-19 healthcare. To evaluate such preferences, we conducted an online conjoint experiment on the precedence of ICU treatment and COVID-19 vaccination. Our results demonstrate that working in essential occupations increases the likelihood of being considered deserving of vaccination and ICU treatment. We also find differences in how essential workers are prioritized, yet these differences cannot be clearly attributed to risk exposure or occupational prestige. Furthermore, we show that age, asthma, household context and compliance with COVID-19 measures significantly affect respondents’ choices, while weight matters only for vaccination priority. Our results therefore contribute to research regarding the characteristics that are salient to fair distributions of scarce resources among workers during a health crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Heusler, Anna & Osiander, Christopher & Schmidtke, Julia, 2022. "Essential for society but not equally deserving of preferential treatment? A discrete-choice experiment regarding COVID-19 healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:311:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622006104
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622006104
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bargain, Olivier & Aminjonov, Ulugbek, 2020. "Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Georg-Christoph Haas & Bettina Müller & Christopher Osiander & Julia Schmidtke & Annette Trahms & Marieke Volkert & Stefan Zins, 2021. "Development of a new COVID-19 panel survey: the IAB high-frequency online personal panel (HOPP)," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 55(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Ganzeboom, H.B.G. & de Graaf, P.M. & Treiman, D.J. & de Leeuw, J., 1992. "A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status," WORC Paper 92.01.001/1, Tilburg University, Work and Organization Research Centre.
    4. Hainmueller, Jens & Hopkins, Daniel J. & Yamamoto, Teppei, 2014. "Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-30, January.
    5. repec:iab:iabjlr:v:55:i::p:art.16 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Sekou Keita & Jérôme Valette, 2019. "Natives’ Attitudes and Immigrants’ Unemployment Durations," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(3), pages 1023-1050, June.
    7. Ole F Norheim & Joelle Abi-Rached & Liam K Bright & Kristine Bærøe & Octávio L. M Ferraz & Siri Gloppen & Alex Voorhoeve, 2021. "Difficult trade-offs in response to COVID-19. The case for open and inclusive decision making," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03566528, HAL.
    8. Yuan, Hang & Long, Qinyi & Huang, Guanglv & Huang, Liqin & Luo, Siyang, 2022. "Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in COVID-19 pandemic control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    9. Ole F Norheim & Joelle Abi-Rached & Liam K Bright & Kristine Bærøe & Octávio L. M Ferraz & Siri Gloppen & Alex Voorhoeve, 2021. "Difficult trade-offs in response to COVID-19. The case for open and inclusive decision making," Post-Print hal-03566528, HAL.
    10. Marianne Bertrand & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 991-1013, September.
    11. repec:iab:iabjlr:v:55:p:art.16 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Liyin Jin & Yunhui Huang & Yongheng Liang & Qiang Zhang, 2021. "Who Gets the Ventilator? Moral Decision Making Regarding Medical Resource Allocation in a Pandemic," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(1), pages 159-167.
    13. Karla Romero Starke & Gabriela Petereit-Haack & Melanie Schubert & Daniel Kämpf & Alexandra Schliebner & Janice Hegewald & Andreas Seidler, 2020. "The Age-Related Risk of Severe Outcomes Due to COVID-19 Infection: A Rapid Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-24, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Perna, Roberta & Umpierrez de Reguero, Sebastián, 2025. "Intra-EU migration and healthcare deservingness: A conjoint experiment in Belgium and Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dale, Elina & Peacocke, Elizabeth F. & Movik, Espen & Voorhoeve, Alex & Ottersen, Trygve & Kurowski, Christoph & Evans, David B. & Norheim, Ole Frithjof & Gopinathan, Unni, 2023. "Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119799, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Michael Rochlitz & Evgeniya Mitrokhina & Irina Nizovkina, 2020. "Bureaucratic Discrimination in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes: Experimental Evidence from Russia," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2010, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    3. Sokolov, Boris, 2025. "Causal Estimands for Policy Evaluation and Beyond," SocArXiv 4vtpk_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:j43tn_v2 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Cornago Bonal, Luis & Raffaelli, Francesco, 2024. "Political Identities and the Politics of Workplace Cooperation," OSF Preprints j43tn, Center for Open Science.
    6. Yuan, Yuan & Liu, Xiao & Zhang, Shunyuan & Srinivasan, Kannan, 2025. "Gender and racial price disparities in the NFT marketplace," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 644-667.
    7. World Bank, 2023. "Open and Inclusive," World Bank Publications - Reports 39953, The World Bank Group.
    8. repec:osf:osfxxx:j43tn_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Gosciak, Jennah & Molitor, Daniel & Lundberg, Ian, 2025. "Adaptive Randomization in Conjoint Survey Experiments," SocArXiv 69y2j_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. repec:osf:socarx:7ady6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Jürgen Gerhards & Julia Tuppat, 2018. "„Boundary Maintenance“ oder „Boundary Crossing“? Symbolische Grenzarbeit bei der Vornamenvergabe bei Migrantinnen," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 996, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    12. Esmonde, Katelyn & Jones, Jeff & Johns, Michaela & Hutler, Brian & Faden, Ruth & Barnhill, Anne, 2024. "“Lives versus livelihoods”: Conflict and coherence between policy objectives in the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    13. Carol Bibiana Colonia & Rosanna Camerano-Ruiz & Andrés Felipe Mora-Salamanca & Ana Beatriz Vásquez-Rodríguez & Camilo Alberto Pino-Gutiérrez & Luz Amparo Pérez-Fonseca & Deidamia García-Quintero & Jen, 2021. "SARS-CoV-2 Infection among School Population of One Developing Country. Do School Closures Protect Students and Teachers against SARS-CoV-2 Infection?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Umer, Hamza, 2022. "Does pro-sociality or trust better predict staying home behavior during the Covid-19?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    15. Chowdhury, Shyamal & Ooi, Evarn & Slonim, Robert, 2017. "Racial discrimination and white first name adoption: a field experiment in the Australian labour market," Working Papers 2017-15, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    16. Mujcic, Redzo & Frijters, Paul, 2013. "Still Not Allowed on the Bus: It Matters If You're Black or White!," IZA Discussion Papers 7300, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Daniela Del Boca & Chiara Monfardini & Sarah Grace See, 2022. "Early Childcare Duration and Student' Later Outcomes in Europe," Working Papers 2022-021, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    18. Anthony Edo & Nicolas Jacquemet & Constantine Yannelis, 2019. "Language skills and homophilous hiring discrimination: Evidence from gender and racially differentiated applications," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 349-376, March.
    19. Lisanne de Blok & Max Heermann & Julian Schuessler & Dirk Leuffen & Catherine E. de Vries, 2024. "All on board? The role of institutional design for public support for differentiated integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 593-604, September.
    20. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    21. Olga Khokhlova & Nishtha Lamba & Aditi Bhatia & Marina Vinogradova, 2021. "Biowarfare conspiracy, faith in government, and compliance with safety guidelines during COVID-19: an international study," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 20(2), pages 235-251, November.
    22. Kevin Lang & Ariella Kahn-Lang Spitzer, 2020. "Race Discrimination: An Economic Perspective," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 68-89, Spring.
    23. Catherine E De Vries & Simon Hix & Miriam Sorace, 2025. "Reforming supranational institutions: Insights from a conjoint experiment in 16 countries," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(4), pages 649-666, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:311:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622006104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.