IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v302y2022ics0277953622002982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographic disparities in access to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder across US census tracts based on treatment utilization behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Mitchell, Penelope
  • Samsel, Steven
  • Curtin, Kevin M.
  • Price, Ashleigh
  • Turner, Daniel
  • Tramp, Ryan
  • Hudnall, Matthew
  • Parton, Jason
  • Lewis, Dwight

Abstract

Drug overdose is the leading cause of accidental death in the U.S. with deaths from opioid overdose occurring at a higher rate in rural areas. The gaps in the provision of healthcare services have been exacerbated by the opioid crisis leaving vulnerable populations without access to preventative care and education, harm reduction, both chronic and acute treatment of the symptoms of opioid use disorder (OUD), and long-term psychological support for those with OUD and their families. There has been a call in the literature -and a federal mandate-for increased access to opioid treatment facilities, but to date this access has not been operationalized using best practices in geography. Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) with FDA-approved methadone or buprenorphine has been shown to increase treatment retention, reduce opioid use and associated health and societal harms, and reduce opioid related overdose, and as such is considered the most effective treatment for OUD. The objective of this study is to examine U.S. adults' spatial access to MOUD — specifically locations of certified Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) and DATA-waived Buprenorphine providers. A gravity-based variant of the enhanced two-step floating catchment area model is employed, where friction of distance is based on previously published willingness to travel distances for patients visiting OTPs, to assess how opioid agonist treatment accessibility varies across the nation. Findings suggest that there are extensive ‘treatment deserts’ where there is little to no physical access to MOUD, especially in rural areas. The significance of this work lies in the incorporation of treatment utilization behavior in the access metric, and the continued confirmation of gaps in access to OUD services despite federal efforts to improve accessibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitchell, Penelope & Samsel, Steven & Curtin, Kevin M. & Price, Ashleigh & Turner, Daniel & Tramp, Ryan & Hudnall, Matthew & Parton, Jason & Lewis, Dwight, 2022. "Geographic disparities in access to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder across US census tracts based on treatment utilization behavior," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:302:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622002982
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622002982
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abby Alpert & David Powell & Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, 2017. "Supply-Side Drug Policy in the Presence of Substitutes: Evidence from the Introduction of Abuse-Deterrent Opioids," NBER Working Papers 23031, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Hart, L.G. & Larson, E.H. & Lishner, D.M., 2005. "Rural definitions for health policy and research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(7), pages 1149-1155.
    3. Towne, Samuel D. & Probst, Janice C. & Hardin, James W. & Bell, Bethany A. & Glover, Saundra, 2017. "Health & access to care among working-age lower income adults in the Great Recession: Disparities across race and ethnicity and geospatial factors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 30-44.
    4. Paul L. Delamater, 2018. "Comment on “A Conceptual Framework for Quality Healthcare Accessibility: a Scalable Approach for Big Data Technologies”," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 303-309, April.
    5. Tao, Zhuolin & Cheng, Yang & Du, Shishuai & Feng, Ling & Wang, Shaoshuai, 2020. "Accessibility to delivery care in Hubei Province, China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Khan, Abdullah A., 1992. "An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 275-287, October.
    7. Dasgupta, N. & Beletsky, L. & Ciccarone, D., 2018. "Opioid Crisis: No Easy Fix to Its Social and Economic Determinants," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(2), pages 182-186.
    8. Hansen, H. & Netherland, J., 2016. "Is the prescription opioid epidemic a white problem?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(12), pages 2127-2129.
    9. Abby Alpert & David Powell & Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, 2018. "Supply-Side Drug Policy in the Presence of Substitutes: Evidence from the Introduction of Abuse-Deterrent Opioids," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 1-35, November.
    10. Merzel, C., 2000. "Gender differences in health care access indicators in an urban, low- income community," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(6), pages 909-916.
    11. Paul L Delamater & Joseph P Messina & Sue C Grady & Vince WinklerPrins & Ashton M Shortridge, 2013. "Do More Hospital Beds Lead to Higher Hospitalization Rates? A Spatial Examination of Roemer’s Law," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Fitzpatrick, A.L. & Powe, N.R. & Cooper, L.S. & Ives, D.G. & Robbins, J.A. & Enright, E., 2004. "Barriers to health care access among the elderly and who perceives them," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(10), pages 1788-1794.
    13. Jones, C.M. & Campopiano, M. & Baldwin, G. & McCance-Katz, E., 2015. "National and state treatment need and capacity for opioid agonist medication-assisted treatment," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(8), pages 55-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meinhofer, Angélica & Witman, Allison E., 2018. "The role of health insurance on treatment for opioid use disorders: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 177-197.
    2. Gihleb, Rania & Giuntella, Osea & Zhang, Ning, 2020. "Prescription drug monitoring programs and neonatal outcomes," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Jörg Kalbfuß & Reto Odermatt & Alois Stutzer, 2018. "Medical marijuana laws and mental health in the United States," CEP Discussion Papers dp1546, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Matthew T. Knowles, 2022. "How access to addictive drugs affects the supply of substance abuse treatment: Evidence from Medicare Part D," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 1649-1675, August.
    5. Molly Schnell & Janet Currie, 2018. "Addressing the Opioid Epidemic: Is There a Role for Physician Education?," American Journal of Health Economics, MIT Press, vol. 4(3), pages 383-410, Summer.
    6. Deiana, Claudio & Giua, Ludovica & Nistico, Roberto, 2019. "The Economics behind the Epidemic: Afghan Opium Price and Prescription Opioids in the US," IZA Discussion Papers 12872, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Borgschulte, Mark & Corredor-Waldron, Adriana & Marshall, Guillermo, 2018. "A path out: Prescription drug abuse, treatment, and suicide," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 169-184.
    8. Boslett, Andrew & Hill, Elaine, 2022. "Mortality during resource booms and busts," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Aliprantis, Dionissi & Fee, Kyle & Schweitzer, Mark E., 2023. "Opioids and the labor market," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Suppliet, Moritz, 2020. "Umbrella branding in pharmaceutical markets," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Mark McInerney, 2017. "The Affordable Care Act, Public Insurance Expansion and Opioid Overdose Mortality," Working papers 2017-23, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    12. Shiyu Zhang & Daniel Guth, 2021. "The OxyContin Reformulation Revisited: New Evidence From Improved Definitions of Markets and Substitutes," Papers 2101.01128, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    13. Xiaoxiao Liu & Judy E. Seidel & Terrence McDonald & Alka B. Patel & Nigel Waters & Stefania Bertazzon & Rizwan Shahid & Deborah A. Marshall, 2022. "Rural–Urban Disparities in Realized Spatial Access to General Practitioners, Orthopedic Surgeons, and Physiotherapists among People with Osteoarthritis in Alberta, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Aparna Keshaviah & Editor, "undated". "Special Report: The Potential of Wastewater Testing for Public Health and Safety," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 5a867fbc382040a1af74f957b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    15. Daniele, Gianmarco & Le Moglie, Marco & Masera, Federico, 2023. "Pains, guns and moves: The effect of the U.S. opioid epidemic on Mexican migration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Gihleb, Rania & Giuntella, Osea & Zhang, Ning, 2018. "The Effects of Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs on Foster Care Admissions," IZA Discussion Papers 11470, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Shishir Shakya & Collin Hodges, 2023. "Must‐access prescription drug monitoring programs and retail opioid sales," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(1), pages 146-165, January.
    18. Justine S. Hastings & Mark Howison & Sarah E. Inman, 2020. "Predicting high-risk opioid prescriptions before they are given," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(4), pages 1917-1923, January.
    19. Christopher J. Ruhm, 2018. "Deaths of Despair or Drug Problems?," NBER Working Papers 24188, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. McMichael, Benjamin J. & Van Horn, R. Lawrence & Viscusi, W. Kip, 2020. "The impact of cannabis access laws on opioid prescribing," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:302:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622002982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.