IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v114y2025ics0739885925001593.html

Revisiting the Transantiago reform: were all the lessons learned?

Author

Listed:
  • Gómez-Lobo, Andrés

Abstract

In Santiago, the capital of Chile, an ambitious reform of the public transport system, named Transantiago, was introduced in February 2007. Serious design and implementation problems were immediately evident, creating a major social and political crisis. In this paper we revisit this experience and argue that one of the main ―if not the main― design errors behind the initial failure was the lack of funding for infrastructure and operational subsidies. The higher cost of the new system was implicitly funded through a decrease in the fleet size and network coverage, as well as an excessive trunk-feeder service configuration. This ultimately led to an increase in the generalized cost of transit and a significant reduction in users’ welfare. We argue that this same issue is apparent in other problematic transit reforms in the region, including Mibus in Panama, SITP in Bogota and the SITM experience in intermediate cities of Colombia. The main lesson for policymakers is that if public funds are not available then the pace and ambitions of a transit reform need to be scaled back.

Suggested Citation

  • Gómez-Lobo, Andrés, 2025. "Revisiting the Transantiago reform: were all the lessons learned?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:114:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925001593
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925001593
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María Yáñez & Patricio Mansilla & Juan de Ortúzar, 2010. "The Santiago Panel: measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 125-149, January.
    2. Patricia Yañez-Pagans & Daniel Martinez & Oscar A. Mitnik & Lynn Scholl & Antonia Vazquez, 2019. "Urban transport systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: lessons and challenges," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Hidalgo, Darío & Pereira, Liliana & Estupiñán, Nicolás & Jiménez, Pedro Luis, 2013. "TransMilenio BRT system in Bogota, high performance and positive impact – Main results of an ex-post evaluation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 133-138.
    4. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Daniel Rosas-Satizábal & Darío Hidalgo, 2023. "Big effort, little gain for users: lessons from the public transport system reform in Bogotá," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 411-433, June.
    5. Leonardo J. Basso & Hugo E. Silva, 2014. "Efficiency and Substitutability of Transit Subsidies and Other Urban Transport Policies," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 6(4), pages 1-33, November.
    6. Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Batarce, Marco & Hidalgo, Dario, 2014. "Transantiago, five years after its launch," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 184-193.
    7. Andrés Gómez-Lobo & Julio Briones, 2014. "Incentives in Bus Concession Contracts: A Review of Several Experiences in Latin America," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 246-265, March.
    8. Beltrán, Pablo & Gschwender, Antonio & Palma, Carolina, 2013. "The impact of compliance measures on the operation of a bus system: The case of Transantiago," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 79-89.
    9. Ian W. H. Parry & Kenneth A. Small, 2009. "Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(3), pages 700-724, June.
    10. Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Gschwender, Antonio, 2008. "Transantiago: A tale of two cities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 45-53, January.
    11. Sergio Jara-Díaz & Antonio Gschwender, 2009. "The effect of financial constraints on the optimal design of public transport services," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 65-75, January.
    12. Sun, Yanshuo & Guo, Qianwen & Schonfeld, Paul & Li, Zhongfei, 2016. "Implications of the cost of public funds in public transit subsidization and regulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 236-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    2. Sheng, Dian & Meng, Qiang, 2020. "Public bus service contracting: A critical review and future research opportunities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Batarce, Marco & Ávila, Franco, 2020. "Misguided quality incentives: The case of the Santiago bus system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 376-399.
    4. Vigren, Andreas & Pyddoke, Roger, 2020. "The impact on bus ridership of passenger incentive contracts in public transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 144-159.
    5. Tirachini, Alejandro & Proost, Stef, 2021. "Transport taxes and subsidies in developing countries: The effect of income inequality aversion," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    6. Godachevich, Javiera & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "Does the measured performance of bus operators depend on the index chosen to assess reliability in contracts? An analysis of bus headway variability," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Sunio, Varsolo & Gaspay, Sandy & Guillen, Marie Danielle & Mariano, Patricia & Mora, Regina, 2019. "Analysis of the public transport modernization via system reconfiguration: The ongoing case in the Philippines," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-19.
    8. Xuto, Praj & Anderson, Richard J. & Graham, Daniel J. & Hörcher, Daniel, 2021. "Optimal infrastructure reinvestment in urban rail systems: A dynamic supply optimisation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 251-268.
    9. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Fielbaum, Andrés & Gschwender, Antonio, 2020. "Strategies for transit fleet design considering peak and off-peak periods using the single-line model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-18.
    10. González, Felipe & Silva, Hugo E., 2025. "JUE insight: Efficiency of bus priority infrastructure," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Ihab Kaddoura & Benjamin Kickhöfer & Andreas Neumann & Alejandro Tirachini, 2015. "Agent-based optimisation of public transport supply and pricing: impacts of activity scheduling decisions and simulation randomness," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1039-1061, November.
    12. Ramos, Raúl & Silva, Hugo E., 2023. "Fare evasion in public transport: How does it affect the optimal design and pricing?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Gómez-Lobo, Andrés, 2020. "Transit reforms in intermediate cities of Colombia: An ex-post evaluation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 349-364.
    14. Martin W Adler & Federica Liberini & Antonio Russo & Jos N. van Ommeren, 2021. "The congestion relief benefit of public transit: evidence from Rome," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 397-431.
    15. Hörcher, Daniel & De Borger, Bruno & Seifu, Woubit & Graham, Daniel J., 2020. "Public transport provision under agglomeration economies," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. García-Herrera, Alisson & Basso, Leonardo J. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2024. "Microeconomic analysis of ridesourcing market regulation policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    17. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2021. "On employer-paid parking and parking (cash-out) policy: A formal synthesis of different perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 499-516.
    18. Börjesson, Maria & Fung, Chau Man & Proost, Stef & Yan, Zifei, 2018. "Do buses hinder cyclists or is it the other way around? Optimal bus fares, bus stops and cycling tolls," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 326-346.
    19. Samuel Heroy & Isabella Loaiza & Alex Pentland & Neave O’Clery, 2023. "Are neighbourhood amenities associated with more walking and less driving? Yes, but predominantly for the wealthy," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(4), pages 958-982, May.
    20. Bull, Owen & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Silva, Hugo E., 2021. "The impact of fare-free public transport on travel behavior: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • N76 - Economic History - - Economic History: Transport, International and Domestic Trade, Energy, and Other Services - - - Latin America; Caribbean
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:114:y:2025:i:c:s0739885925001593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.