IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v216y2025ics1364032125003600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key aspects and challenges for successful energy communities: A comparative analysis between Latin America and developed countries

Author

Listed:
  • Galindo Noguera, Ana Lisbeth
  • Mendoza Castellanos, Luis Sebastián
  • Ardila Cruz, Sebastian
  • Osorio-Gómez, Gilberto

Abstract

Energy communities (ECs) represent a crucial component of the fair and sustainable energy transition paradigm. The objective of this research is to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of critical elements in the development of ECs in Latin America and developed nations, with the objective of discerning challenges and advancements within each region. A systematic review was conducted to examine the socio-cultural, economic, technological, environmental, legal, and political factors that influence the implementation and adoption of these initiatives of ECs in both regions. The findings indicate that, despite high-income nations having well-defined policies and regulatory frameworks for EC development, they continue to encounter challenges across the examined dimensions. In addition to the issues common to high-income countries, Latin America is confronted with obstacles pertaining to education, infrastructure, and regulatory frameworks. It is therefore imperative that both governmental entities and local communities play a more active role to facilitate the effective advancement of these energy initiatives. This research presents a novel and well-informed perspective, offering essential guidance to accelerate the energy transition in the Latin American context.

Suggested Citation

  • Galindo Noguera, Ana Lisbeth & Mendoza Castellanos, Luis Sebastián & Ardila Cruz, Sebastian & Osorio-Gómez, Gilberto, 2025. "Key aspects and challenges for successful energy communities: A comparative analysis between Latin America and developed countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:216:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125003600
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003600
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:216:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125003600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.