IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v208y2025ics136403212400786x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing technology assessment in energy transitions: A semi-systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Musango, J.K.

Abstract

Technology assessment is evolving and becoming more relevant in evaluating energy transitions. Climate change, energy security, energy justice and sustainability challenges dominate energy transition debates. As technology continues to advance, improving methods to assess energy transitions is crucial. However, limited studies explore assessment methods applicable to energy transitions. This study reviews the literature on energy technology assessment using a semi-systematic review, to understand the state of technology assessment methods and identify areas for improving the assessment practices. The study organised the review into five themes: characteristics of technology assessments, energy transition technologies assessed, the purpose of assessment, methods and tools applied, and emerging issues and their implications. The results revealed that conventional technology assessment methods still dominate in the literature. At the same time, six assessment methods are emerging. These are technology acceptance analysis, hybrid analysis, institutional analysis, visioning analysis, integrated assessment and ethical analysis. The study posits three areas for improvement. First, technology assessment can advance transdisciplinary practice and theory. Second, it can develop comprehensive assessments. Third, it can foster sustainability as a foundation for assessing energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Musango, J.K., 2025. "Advancing technology assessment in energy transitions: A semi-systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:208:y:2025:i:c:s136403212400786x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400786X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adriana Marcucci & Socrates Kypreos & Evangelos Panos, 2017. "The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: energy transition and the role of direct air capture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 181-193, September.
    2. Armin Grunwald, 2019. "The inherently democratic nature of technology assessment," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(5), pages 702-709.
    3. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    4. Gallo, A.B. & Simões-Moreira, J.R. & Costa, H.K.M. & Santos, M.M. & Moutinho dos Santos, E., 2016. "Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 800-822.
    5. Emmerich, Philip & Hülemeier, Anna-Gesina & Jendryczko, David & Baumann, Manuel Johann & Weil, Marcel & Baur, Dorothee, 2020. "Public acceptance of emerging energy technologies in context of the German energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Musango, Josephine K. & Brent, Alan C., 2011. "Assessing the sustainability of energy technological systems in Southern Africa: A review and way forward," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 145-155.
    7. Dumbrell, Nikki P. & Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Zuo, Alec & Adamson, David, 2022. "Public willingness to make trade-offs in the development of a hydrogen industry in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Jürgen Kopfmüller & Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle & Tobias Naegler & Jens Buchgeister & Klaus-Rainer Bräutigam & Volker Stelzer, 2021. "Integrative Scenario Assessment as a Tool to Support Decisions in Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, March.
    9. Rafaela Hillerbrand & Christine Milchram & Jens Schippl, 2021. "Using the Capability Approach as a normative perspective on energy justice: Insights from two case studies on digitalisation in the energy sector," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 336-359, April.
    10. Truffer, Bernhard & Schippl, Jens & Fleischer, Torsten, 2017. "Decentering technology in technology assessment: prospects for socio-technical transitions in electric mobility in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 34-48.
    11. Truong, An Ha & Ha-Duong, Minh & Tran, Hoang Anh, 2022. "Economics of co-firing rice straw in coal power plants in Vietnam," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Sebastian Schär & Jutta Geldermann, 2021. "Adopting Multiactor Multicriteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Energy Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Gabrielli, Paolo & Charbonnier, Flora & Guidolin, Annalisa & Mazzotti, Marco, 2020. "Enabling low-carbon hydrogen supply chains through use of biomass and carbon capture and storage: A Swiss case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    14. Leonhard Späth & Elisa Amodeo & Alessandro Luè & Simona Muratori & Anna Scolobig & Anthony Patt, 2018. "Stakeholder engagement and multi-criteria decision aiding in the electricity transmission grid reinforcement: evidence from a role-playing game," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(13), pages 2378-2395, November.
    15. Binod Prasad Koirala & Ellen van Oost & Henny van der Windt, 2020. "Innovation Dynamics of Socio-Technical Alignment in Community Energy Storage: The Cases of DrTen and Ecovat," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Man Yu & Anthony Halog, 2015. "Solar Photovoltaic Development in Australia—A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-35, January.
    17. Yasmin, Nazia & Grundmann, Philipp, 2019. "Adoption and diffusion of renewable energy – The case of biogas as alternative fuel for cooking in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 255-264.
    18. Musango, Josephine Kaviti & Ouma-Mugabe, John, 2024. "A generic technology assessment framework for sustainable energy transitions in African contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    19. Dirk Scheer & Maike Schmidt & Marion Dreyer & Lisa Schmieder & Annika Arnold, 2022. "Integrated Policy Package Assessment (IPPA): A Problem-Oriented Research Approach for Sustainability Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Dolf Gielen & Deger Saygin & Emanuele Taibi & Jean‐Pierre Birat, 2020. "Renewables‐based decarbonization and relocation of iron and steel making: A case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1113-1125, October.
    21. John Ouma Mugabe & Josephine Kaviti Musango, 2024. "Technology assessment in Africa: capacity needs and opportunities," Chapters, in: Armin Grunwald (ed.), Handbook of Technology Assessment, chapter 23, pages 228-236, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    22. Bögel, Paula Maria & Upham, Paul & Shahrokni, Hossein & Kordas, Olga, 2021. "What is needed for citizen-centered urban energy transitions: Insights on attitudes towards decentralized energy storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    23. Upham, Paul & Virkamäki, Venla & Kivimaa, Paula & Hildén, Mikael & Wadud, Zia, 2015. "Socio-technical transition governance and public opinion: The case of passenger transport in Finland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 210-219.
    24. Plum, Christiane & Olschewski, Roland & Jobin, Marilou & van Vliet, Oscar, 2019. "Public preferences for the Swiss electricity system after the nuclear phase-out: A choice experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 181-196.
    25. Berjawi, A.E.H. & Walker, S.L. & Patsios, C. & Hosseini, S.H.R., 2021. "An evaluation framework for future integrated energy systems: A whole energy systems approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valsan, Vipina & Vuppala, Naga Sushanth Kumar & Koganti, Sri Sai Harshith & Kalla, Likhit Sai Eswar & Pappala, Kumar Aditya & P., Kanakasabapathy & Ramesh, Maneesha V., 2025. "Conceptual study—Artificial intelligence-integrated blockchain micromarkets for sustainable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Mączka, Krzysztof & Bodnar-Potopnyk, Olena & Matczak, Piotr & Takacs, Viktoria, 2025. "Are Poland and Hungary pushed toward or pulled by energy transition? A narrative analysis of experts' views," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Musango, Josephine Kaviti & Ouma-Mugabe, John, 2024. "A generic technology assessment framework for sustainable energy transitions in African contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Buchner, Johannes & Menrad, Klaus & Decker, Thomas, 2025. "Keep it local and safe: Which system of green hydrogen production in Germany is accepted by citizens?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Hannah Kosow & Sandra Wassermann & Stephan Bartke & Paul Goede & Detlef Grimski & Ines Imbert & Till Jenssen & Oliver Laukel & Matthias Proske & Jochen Protzer & Kim Philip Schumacher & Stefan Siedent, 2022. "Addressing Goal Conflicts: New Policy Mixes for Commercial Land Use Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Dev, Dhairya, 2025. "Crude oil Price forecasting: Leveraging machine learning for global economic stability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Ayami Hayashi & Fuminori Sano & Takashi Homma & Keigo Akimoto, 2023. "Mitigating trade-offs between global food access and net-zero emissions: the potential contribution of direct air carbon capture and storage," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(5), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    10. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    11. Ni, Ji-Qin, 2024. "A review of household and industrial anaerobic digestion in Asia: Biogas development and safety incidents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    14. Amal Almansour & Reem Alotaibi & Hajar Alharbi, 2022. "Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): an integrative review and implications for research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Pomerlyan, Evgeniya & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "Integration - Growth relationship: A literature review and future research agenda using a TCCM approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1106-1118.
    16. Švarc, Jadranka & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Transformative innovation policy or how to escape peripheral policy paradox in European research peripheral countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Alexandru Ciocan & Cosmin Ungureanu & Alin Chitu & Elena Carcadea & George Darie, 2020. "Electrical Longboard for Everyday Urban Commuting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, September.
    18. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    19. Meng, Zhiyi & Li, Eldon Y. & Qiu, Rui, 2020. "Environmental sustainability with free-floating carsharing services: An on-demand refueling recommendation system for Car2go in Seattle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    20. Mukisa, Nicholas & Zamora, Ramon & Lie, Tek Tjing, 2020. "Assessment of community sustainable livelihoods capitals for the implementation of alternative energy technologies in Uganda – Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 886-902.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:208:y:2025:i:c:s136403212400786x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.