IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v133y2020ics1364032120305840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sugarcane for bioethanol production: Potential of bagasse in Chinese perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Jiangfeng
  • Khan, Muhammad Tahir
  • Perecin, Danilo
  • Coelho, Suani T.
  • Zhang, Muqing

Abstract

Being a massive grower of sugarcane, China could use this crop in the biofuel sector. However, this critical aspect of the sugarcane crop in China has not been extensively explored. Therefore, this review analyzed the country's potential, bottlenecks, and a critical analysis of policies vs. the Brazilian model of sugarcane derived biofuels. The study determined that Brazilian sugarcane production significantly varied from Chinese conditions regarding first-generation ethanol production. The first-generation ethanol production is also constrained due to high domestic demands of sugar. However, sugarcane bagasse showed higher theoretical yield potential, density distribution, and cost-efficiency for disintegration in this study. Therefore, it was inferred that bagasse-based (second-generation) ethanol has excellent prospects as it does not obligate any separate transportation costs like other lignocellulosic resources and have relatively less cell wall recalcitrance requirements. Moreover, already available vast quantities of bagasse and backing from government policies also make it the right choice for engendering fuel ethanol. Although cost-effectiveness of second-generation ethanol of sugarcane introduces a hurdle, recent developments in process efficiency, as well as genetic manipulation of sugarcane for cell-wall digestibility, can play a paramount role in augmenting sugarcane's role in this sector. Furthermore, the improvement of sugarcane varieties, the adoption of mechanized production, and the exploration of germplasm resources for energy traits are ascertained as crucial factors for augmenting the commercial aptness of sugarcane bioethanol. The enhanced role of sugarcane in China's biofuels sector would contribute to energy security, sustainable sugarcane production, industrial development, and socioeconomic betterment of the sugarcane farming areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Jiangfeng & Khan, Muhammad Tahir & Perecin, Danilo & Coelho, Suani T. & Zhang, Muqing, 2020. "Sugarcane for bioethanol production: Potential of bagasse in Chinese perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:133:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120305840
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120305840
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Restrepo-Valencia & Arnaldo Walter, 2019. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage Systems in a Typical Sugarcane Mill in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Ulaganathan, Kandasamy & Goud, Sravanthi & Reddy, Madhavi & Kayalvili, Ulaganathan, 2017. "Genome engineering for breaking barriers in lignocellulosic bioethanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1080-1107.
    3. Carminati, Hudson Bolsoni & Milão, Raquel de Freitas D. & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F., 2019. "Bioenergy and full carbon dioxide sinking in sugarcane-biorefinery with post-combustion capture and storage: Techno-economic feasibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    4. Monika Yadav & Kunwar Paritosh & Aakash Chawade & Nidhi Pareek & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2018. "Genetic Engineering of Energy Crops to Reduce Recalcitrance and Enhance Biomass Digestibility," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Wang, Lei & Quiceno, Raul & Price, Catherine & Malpas, Rick & Woods, Jeremy, 2014. "Economic and GHG emissions analyses for sugarcane ethanol in Brazil: Looking forward," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 571-582.
    6. Moraes, Bruna S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Pavanello, Lucas G. & Cavalett, Otávio & Mantelatto, Paulo E. & Bonomi, Antonio & Zaiat, Marcelo, 2014. "Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 825-835.
    7. Luciano Rodrigues & Mirian Rumenos Piedade Bacchi, 2016. "Light fuel demand and public policies in Brazil, 2003–2013," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(54), pages 5300-5313, November.
    8. Mohr, Alison & Raman, Sujatha, 2013. "Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 114-122.
    9. Pereira, L.G. & Cavalett, O. & Bonomi, A. & Zhang, Y. & Warner, E. & Chum, H.L., 2019. "Comparison of biofuel life-cycle GHG emissions assessment tools: The case studies of ethanol produced from sugarcane, corn, and wheat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-12.
    10. De Oliveira, Fernando C. & Coelho, Suani T., 2017. "History, evolution, and environmental impact of biodiesel in Brazil: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 168-179.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Haiyan & Han, Lujia & Dong, Hongmin, 2021. "An insight to pretreatment, enzyme adsorption and enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: Experimental and modeling studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Tamás Mizik, 2021. "Economic Aspects and Sustainability of Ethanol Production—A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Melendez, Jesus R. & Mátyás, Bence & Hena, Sufia & Lowy, Daniel A. & El Salous, Ahmed, 2022. "Perspectives in the production of bioethanol: A review of sustainable methods, technologies, and bioprocesses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Liu, Yao & Zheng, Xiaojie & Tao, Shunhui & Hu, Lei & Zhang, Xiaodong & Lin, Xiaoqing, 2021. "Process optimization for deep eutectic solvent pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse for cellulosic ethanol fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 259-267.
    5. Jain, Sanyam & Kumar, Shushil, 2024. "A comprehensive review of bioethanol production from diverse feedstocks: Current advancements and economic perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    6. Shen, Guannan & Yuan, Xinchuan & Chen, Sitong & Liu, Shuangmei & Jin, Mingjie, 2022. "High titer cellulosic ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse via DLCA pretreatment and process development without washing/detoxifying pretreated biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 904-913.
    7. Yang, Linsheng & Zhou, Yifan & Meng, Bo & Li, Haojie & Zhan, Jian & Xiong, Huaye & Zhao, Huanyu & Cong, Wenfeng & Wang, Xiaozhong & Zhang, Wushuai & Lakshmanan, Prakash & Deng, Yan & Shi, Xiaojun & Ch, 2022. "Reconciling productivity, profitability and sustainability of small-holder sugarcane farms: A combined life cycle and data envelopment analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Adilson João Matias & Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira & Eric Alberto Ocampo Batlle, 2024. "An Evaluation of the Land Available for Sustainable Sugarcane Cultivation and Potential for Producing Ethanol and Bioelectricity in Angola," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Guga, Suri & Ma, Yining & Riao, Dao & Zhi, Feng & Xu, Jie & Zhang, Jiquan, 2023. "Drought monitoring of sugarcane and dynamic variation characteristics under global warming: A case study of Guangxi, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brenda H. M. Silveira & Hirdan K. M. Costa & Edmilson M. Santos, 2023. "Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in Brazil: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Silalertruksa, Thapat & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Pongpat, Patcharaporn, 2015. "Sustainability assessment of sugarcane biorefinery and molasses ethanol production in Thailand using eco-efficiency indicator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 603-609.
    3. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Lauermann, Carlos H. & Hayashi, Thamy C. & Mariños, Diego J. & Rodrigues da Costa, Roberto Berlini & Coronado, Christian J.R. & Roberts, Justo J. & de Carvalho, João A., 2022. "Ethanol as a renewable biofuel: Combustion characteristics and application in engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Silva-Martínez, Rodolfo Daniel & Sanches-Pereira, Alessandro & Ortiz, Willington & Gómez Galindo, Maria Fernanda & Coelho, Suani Teixeira, 2020. "The state-of-the-art of organic waste to energy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Challenges and opportunities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 509-525.
    5. Bello, Sara & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Moreira, Maria Teresa & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "BECCS based on bioethanol from wood residues: Potential towards a carbon-negative transport and side-effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Pereira, L.G. & Cavalett, O. & Bonomi, A. & Zhang, Y. & Warner, E. & Chum, H.L., 2019. "Comparison of biofuel life-cycle GHG emissions assessment tools: The case studies of ethanol produced from sugarcane, corn, and wheat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Canabarro, N.I. & Silva-Ortiz, P. & Nogueira, L.A.H. & Cantarella, H. & Maciel-Filho, R. & Souza, G.M., 2023. "Sustainability assessment of ethanol and biodiesel production in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Guatemala," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Danilo Arcentales-Bastidas & Carla Silva & Angel D. Ramirez, 2022. "The Environmental Profile of Ethanol Derived from Sugarcane in Ecuador: A Life Cycle Assessment Including the Effect of Cogeneration of Electricity in a Sugar Industrial Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Natalia Stefania Piotrowska & Stanisław Zbigniew Czachorowski & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2020. "Ground Beetles ( Carabidae ) in the Short-Rotation Coppice Willow and Poplar Plants—Synergistic Benefits System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Raquel de Souza Deuber & Jéssica Marcon Bressanin & Daniel Santos Fernandes & Henrique Real Guimarães & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Antonio Bonomi & Leonardo Vasconcelos Fregolente & Marcos Djun Barbosa , 2023. "Production of Sustainable Aviation Fuels from Lignocellulosic Residues in Brazil through Hydrothermal Liquefaction: Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Mahlia, T.M.I. & Syazmi, Z.A.H.S. & Mofijur, M. & Abas, A.E. Pg & Bilad, M.R. & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Silitonga, A.S., 2020. "Patent landscape review on biodiesel production: Technology updates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Ribeiro, Barbara E. & Quintanilla, Miguel A., 2015. "Transitions in biofuel technologies: An appraisal of the social impacts of cellulosic ethanol using the Delphi method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 53-68.
    14. Gamborg, Christian & Anker, Helle Tegner & Sandøe, Peter, 2014. "Ethical and legal challenges in bioenergy governance: Coping with value disagreement and regulatory complexity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 326-333.
    15. Fedorova, Elena & Pongrácz, Eva, 2019. "Cumulative social effect assessment framework to evaluate the accumulation of social sustainability benefits of regional bioenergy value chains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1073-1088.
    16. Nariê Rinke Dias de Souza & Bruno Colling Klein & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Otavio Cavalett & Antonio Bonomi, 2021. "Towards Comparable Carbon Credits: Harmonization of LCA Models of Cellulosic Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Lorenzo Di Lucia & Barbara Ribeiro, 2018. "Enacting Responsibilities in Landscape Design: The Case of Advanced Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Arodudu, Oludunsin Tunrayo & Helming, Katharina & Voinov, Alexey & Wiggering, Hubert, 2017. "Integrating agronomic factors into energy efficiency assessment of agro-bioenergy production – A case study of ethanol and biogas production from maize feedstock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 426-439.
    19. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of PLA Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Nicodème, Thibault & Berchem, Thomas & Jacquet, Nicolas & Richel, Aurore, 2018. "Thermochemical conversion of sugar industry by-products to biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 151-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:133:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120305840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.