IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v66y2014icp232-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of methods for estimating energy performance of biogas production

Author

Listed:
  • Havukainen, J.
  • Uusitalo, V.
  • Niskanen, A.
  • Kapustina, V.
  • Horttanainen, M.

Abstract

This study focused on identifying various system boundaries and evaluating methods of estimating energy performance of biogas production. First, the output–input ratio method used for evaluating energy performance from the system boundaries was reviewed. Secondly, ways to assess the efficiency of biogas use and parasitic energy demand were investigated. Thirdly, an approach for comparing biogas production to other energy production methods was evaluated. Data from an existing biogas plant, located in Finland, was used for the evaluation of the methods. The results indicate that calculating and comparing the output–input ratios (Rpr1, Rpr2, Rut, Rpl and Rsy) can be used in evaluating the performance of biogas production system. In addition, the parasitic energy demand calculations (w) and the efficiency of utilizing produced biogas (η) provide detailed information on energy performance of the biogas plant. Furthermore, Rf and energy output in relation to total solid mass of feedstock (FO/TS) are useful in comparing biogas production with other energy recovery technologies. As a conclusion it is essential for the comparability of biogas plants that their energy performance would be calculated in a more consistent manner in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Havukainen, J. & Uusitalo, V. & Niskanen, A. & Kapustina, V. & Horttanainen, M., 2014. "Evaluation of methods for estimating energy performance of biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 232-240.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:232-240
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148113006757
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cao, Yucheng & Pawłowski, Artur, 2012. "Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: Brief overview and energy efficiency assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1657-1665.
    2. Djatkov, Djordje & Effenberger, Mathias & Lehner, Andreas & Martinov, Milan & Tesic, Milos & Gronauer, Andreas, 2012. "New method for assessing the performance of agricultural biogas plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 104-112.
    3. Patterson, Murray G, 1996. "What is energy efficiency? : Concepts, indicators and methodological issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 377-390, May.
    4. Lacour, S. & Chinese, T. & Alkadee, D. & Perilhon, C. & Descombes, G., 2012. "Energy and environmental balance of biogas for dual-fuel mobile applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1745-1753.
    5. Tanaka, Kanako, 2008. "Assessment of energy efficiency performance measures in industry and their application for policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2877-2892, August.
    6. Sanchez, M.E. & Otero, M. & Gómez, X. & Morán, A., 2009. "Thermogravimetric kinetic analysis of the combustion of biowastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1622-1627.
    7. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wandera, Simon M. & Qiao, Wei & Algapani, Dalal E. & Bi, Shaojie & Yin, Dongmin & Qi, Xiangyang & Liu, Yueling & Dach, Jacek & Dong, Renjie, 2018. "Searching for possibilities to improve the performance of full scale agricultural biogas plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 720-727.
    2. De Clercq, Djavan & Wen, Zongguo & Fan, Fei & Caicedo, Luis, 2016. "Biomethane production potential from restaurant food waste in megacities and project level-bottlenecks: A case study in Beijing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1676-1685.
    3. Díaz-Trujillo, Luis Alberto & Nápoles-Rivera, Fabricio, 2019. "Optimization of biogas supply chain in Mexico considering economic and environmental aspects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1227-1240.
    4. Auburger, Sebastian & Jacobs, Anna & Märländer, Bernward & Bahrs, Enno, 2016. "Economic optimization of feedstock mix for energy production with biogas technology in Germany with a special focus on sugar beets – Effects on greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Daniela Szymańska & Aleksandra Lewandowska, 2015. "Biogas Power Plants in Poland—Structure, Capacity, and Spatial Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Qian, Hongliang & Chen, Wei & Zhu, Weiwei & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Guo, Xiaojing & Huang, Dechun & Liang, Xiaodong & Kontogeorgis, Georgios M., 2019. "Simulation and evaluation of utilization pathways of biomasses based on thermodynamic data prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 610-625.
    7. Bożym, Marta & Florczak, Iwona & Zdanowska, Paulina & Wojdalski, Janusz & Klimkiewicz, Marek, 2015. "An analysis of metal concentrations in food wastes for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 467-472.
    8. Murillo-Alvarado, Pascual Eduardo & Ponce-Ortega, José María, 2022. "An optimization approach to increase the human development index through a biogas supply chain in a developing region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 347-357.
    9. Strzalka, Rafal & Schneider, Dietrich & Eicker, Ursula, 2017. "Current status of bioenergy technologies in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 801-820.
    10. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    11. Lora Grando, Rafaela & de Souza Antune, Adelaide Maria & da Fonseca, Fabiana Valéria & Sánchez, Antoni & Barrena, Raquel & Font, Xavier, 2017. "Technology overview of biogas production in anaerobic digestion plants: A European evaluation of research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 44-53.
    12. Uusitalo, V. & Havukainen, J. & Soukka, R. & Väisänen, S. & Havukainen, M. & Luoranen, M., 2015. "Systematic approach for recognizing limiting factors for growth of biomethane use in transportation sector – A case study in Finland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 479-488.
    13. Emma Lindkvist & Maria T. Johansson & Jakob Rosenqvist, 2017. "Methodology for Analysing Energy Demand in Biogas Production Plants—A Comparative Study of Two Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Djatkov, Djordje & Effenberger, Mathias & Martinov, Milan, 2014. "Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 163-175.
    15. De Meyer, Annelies & Cattrysse, Dirk & Van Orshoven, Jos, 2015. "A generic mathematical model to optimise strategic and tactical decisions in biomass-based supply chains (OPTIMASS)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 247-264.
    16. Benedikt Hülsemann & Torsten Mächtig & Marcel Pohl & Jan Liebetrau & Joachim Müller & Eberhard Hartung & Hans Oechsner, 2021. "Comparison of Biological Efficiency Assessment Methods and Their Application to Full-Scale Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katinas, Vladislovas & Marčiukaitis, Mantas & Perednis, Eugenijus & Dzenajavičienė, Eugenija Farida, 2019. "Analysis of biodegradable waste use for energy generation in Lithuania," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 559-567.
    2. Emma Lindkvist & Maria T. Johansson & Jakob Rosenqvist, 2017. "Methodology for Analysing Energy Demand in Biogas Production Plants—A Comparative Study of Two Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Djatkov, Djordje & Effenberger, Mathias & Martinov, Milan, 2014. "Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 163-175.
    4. Peng, Lihong & Zhang, Yiting & Wang, Yejun & Zeng, Xiaoling & Peng, Najun & Yu, Ang, 2015. "Energy efficiency and influencing factor analysis in the overall Chinese textile industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1222-1229.
    5. Bei He & Xiaoyun Du & Junkang Li & Dan Chen, 2023. "A Effectiveness-and Efficiency-Based Improved Approach for Measuring Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Wu, Kaiyao & Shi, Jiyuan & Yang, Tinggan, 2017. "Has energy efficiency performance improved in China?—non-energy sectors evidence from sequenced hybrid energy use tables," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 169-181.
    7. Ruzzenenti, F. & Basosi, R., 2009. "Evaluation of the energy efficiency evolution in the European road freight transport sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 4079-4085, October.
    8. Maghanaki, M. Mohammadi & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G. & Galogah, R. Janzadeh, 2013. "Potential of biogas production in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 702-714.
    9. Rui Dai & Jianxiong Zhang & Shichen Zhang, 2019. "Standard Setting with Considerations of Energy Efficiency Evolution and Market Competition," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-21, May.
    10. Roque G Stagnitta & Matteo V Rocco & Emanuela Colombo, 2020. "A Complementary Approach to Traditional Energy Balances for Assessing Energy Efficiency Measures in Final Uses: The Case of Space Heating and Cooling in Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-29, August.
    11. Proskuryakova, L. & Kovalev, A., 2015. "Measuring energy efficiency: Is energy intensity a good evidence base?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 450-459.
    12. Montorsi, L. & Milani, M. & Venturelli, M., 2018. "Economic assessment of an integrated waste to energy system for an urban sewage treatment plant: A numerical approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 105-110.
    13. Cagno, Enrico & Ramirez-Portilla, Andres & Trianni, Andrea, 2015. "Linking energy efficiency and innovation practices: Empirical evidence from the foundry sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 240-256.
    14. Moreda, Iván López, 2016. "The potential of biogas production in Uruguay," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1580-1591.
    15. Andreas Eder & Bernhard Mahlberg, 2018. "Size, Subsidies and Technical Efficiency in Renewable Energy Production: The Case of Austrian Biogas Plants," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    16. Alessandro Franco & Lorenzo Miserocchi & Daniele Testi, 2023. "Energy Indicators for Enabling Energy Transition in Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Bhadbhade, Navdeep & Yilmaz, Selin & Zuberi, Jibran S. & Eichhammer, Wolfgang & Patel, Martin K., 2020. "The evolution of energy efficiency in Switzerland in the period 2000–2016," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin, 2014. "Energy efficiency and sustainability of complex biogas systems: A 3-level emergetic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 151-163.
    19. Guilherme Fracaro & Esa Vakkilainen & Marcelo Hamaguchi & Samuel Nelson Melegari de Souza, 2012. "Energy Efficiency in the Brazilian Pulp and Paper Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Giacone, E. & Mancò, S., 2012. "Energy efficiency measurement in industrial processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 331-345.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:232-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.