IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/quaeco/v92y2023icp274-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Party direct control and corporate fraud: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Quanxi
  • Wang, Zhimin
  • Guan, Xin
  • Qin, Wei

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the involvement of Party committees of the Communist Party of China in the decision-making process of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China on fraudulent activities. Based on a sample of 1180 listed SOEs covering the period 2004–2019, we present empirical evidence of a negative relationship between Party direct control and the likelihood of corporate fraud, mainly driven by the effect of Party participation in the board of directors. Additional evidence suggests that Party direct control raises the anticipated costs associated with fraud by facilitating the exposure of fraudulent activities and enhancing the likelihood of CEO dismissal upon the detection of wrongdoing. Furthermore, we observe that the negative association between party direct control and corporate fraud is weakened in firms with robust external monitoring mechanisms and significant levels of state ownership. Additionally, our findings reveal that the deterrent effect of Party direct control on corporate fraud is enhanced following the implementation of the 2015 “Discussion Precedence” reform, which bestowed Party committee members with increased decision-making authority in SOEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Quanxi & Wang, Zhimin & Guan, Xin & Qin, Wei, 2023. "Party direct control and corporate fraud: Evidence from China," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 274-290.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:92:y:2023:i:c:p:274-290
    DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2023.10.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976923001199
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.qref.2023.10.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:92:y:2023:i:c:p:274-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620167 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.