IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubeco/v252y2025ics0047272725002178.html

The role of unrealized gains and borrowing in the taxation of the rich

Author

Listed:
  • Fox, Edward
  • Liscow, Zachary

Abstract

As deficits rise and concerns about tax avoidance by the rich increase, we study how unrealized gains and borrowing affect Americans’ income taxes. We have four main findings: First, measuring “economic income” as currently-taxed income plus new unrealized gains, the income tax base captures 60 % of economic income of the top 1 % of wealth-holders (and 71 % adjusting for inflation) and the vast majority of income for lower wealth groups. Second, adjusting for unrealized gains substantially lessens the degree of progressivity in the income tax, although it remains largely progressive. Third, we quantify for the first time the amount of borrowing across the full wealth distribution. Focusing on the top 1 %, while total borrowing is substantial, new borrowing each year is fairly small (1–2 % of economic income) compared to their new unrealized gains, suggesting that “buy, borrow, die” is not a dominant tax avoidance strategy for the rich. Fourth, consumption is less than liquid income for rich Americans, partly because the rich have a large amount of liquid income, and partly because their savings rates are high, suggesting that the main tax avoidance strategy of the super-rich is “buy, save, die.”

Suggested Citation

  • Fox, Edward & Liscow, Zachary, 2025. "The role of unrealized gains and borrowing in the taxation of the rich," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:252:y:2025:i:c:s0047272725002178
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272725002178
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alice Henriques Volz & Elizabeth Llanes & Jeffrey P. Thompson, 2025. "Do the Rich Really Save More? Answering an Old Question Using the SCF with Direct Measures of Lifetime Earnings and an Expanded Wealth Concept," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2025-097, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Dustin L. Swonder & Damián Vergara, 2025. "A Sufficient Statistics Approach to Optimal Corporate Taxes," NBER Working Papers 34517, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:252:y:2025:i:c:s0047272725002178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505578 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.