IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v169y2026ics0264837726002309.html

Land use transformations and tenure conflicts in the Cerrado-Caatinga frontier: Evidence from Piauí, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Espindola, Giovana Mira de
  • Camara, Gilberto
  • Sousa Júnior, Vicente de Paula
  • Argibay, Daihana Soledad
  • Simões, Rolf

Abstract

Brazil’s Rural Environmental Registry (CAR), established in 2012 under the Forest Code, is a mandatory environmental cadastral system based on self-declaration of property boundaries that plays a central role in environmental enforcement, rural credit allocation, and land-use monitoring. This study develops and applies a hierarchical conflict-resolution framework to systematically identify which portions of the CAR are procedurally reliable and analytically usable for deforestation attribution and regulatory enforcement. We analyzed 310,657 CAR registrations recorded in 2025 in Piauí, Brazil, integrating them with official tenure datasets through a sequence of hierarchical rules for the Cerrado-Caatinga transition, one of the most active agribusiness frontiers. The reconstructed tenure map, derived from the hierarchical framework representing the accumulated state of all property registrations and boundary rectifications, was applied to attribute deforestation recorded between 2013 and 2023. The primary findings indicate that intra-CAR spatial overlaps were detected nearly one-third of the registered area, with boundary conflicts concentrated among larger properties along the Cerrado agribusiness frontier. In terms of deforestation, 94.20% of vegetation loss (1236,100 ha) can be attributable to identifiable actors, of which 86.60% is associated with private properties registered in CAR and official tenure datasets. The top 1% of properties ranked by cumulative deforestation account for 71.50% of total vegetation loss between 2013 and 2023, indicating a pronounced concentration of clearing among a numerically small set of landowners. Of the deforestation associated with private properties, 73.40% is classified as illegal under the Forest Code mandates applied in this analysis, with Legal Forest Reserve deficit violations representing the dominant source of non-compliance. Although over 13 million ha of native vegetation remains on private lands, Legal Reserve deficits are concentrated among large properties in the Cerrado biome, while small properties show the largest number of individual deficit records. These results demonstrate that a hierarchical analytical framework can extract procedurally reliable information from a self-declared registry, providing a scalable basis for spatially targeted enforcement, deforestation attribution, and Forest Code compliance monitoring at the subnational level.

Suggested Citation

  • Espindola, Giovana Mira de & Camara, Gilberto & Sousa Júnior, Vicente de Paula & Argibay, Daihana Soledad & Simões, Rolf, 2026. "Land use transformations and tenure conflicts in the Cerrado-Caatinga frontier: Evidence from Piauí, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002309
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726002309
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.