IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v97y2025ics095717872500181x.html

Effects of relaxing South Korea's increasing-block electricity pricing structure on residential consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Soim
  • Hong, Jong Ho

Abstract

During the extreme heatwaves of 2016, the South Korean government temporarily modified the increasing-block rate (IBR) pricing structure by expanding the usage thresholds for each pricing tier to reduce the burden of electricity bills. This study examines the effects of this adjustment on residential electricity consumption. Using a quasi-experimental approach with household survey data, the analysis reveals that households increase their electricity consumption after receiving bills with reduced charges, undermining the energy conservation goals of the original IBR structure. Specifically, middle-income households show a statistically significant increase in electricity usage, whereas the other groups exhibit negligible changes. The summer IBR relaxation primarily benefits middle-income households, leaving low-income households largely unaffected in terms of affordability. These findings highlight the policy challenges of trying to target and protect vulnerable households during periods of extreme heat.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Soim & Hong, Jong Ho, 2025. "Effects of relaxing South Korea's increasing-block electricity pricing structure on residential consumers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s095717872500181x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.102066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872500181X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Chuanwang & Lin, Boqiang, 2013. "Reforming residential electricity tariff in China: Block tariffs pricing approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 741-752.
    2. Sun, Chuanwang, 2015. "An empirical case study about the reform of tiered pricing for household electricity in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 383-389.
    3. Alberini, Anna & Gans, Will & Velez-Lopez, Daniel, 2011. "Residential Consumption of Gas and Electricity in the U.S.: The Role of Prices and Income," Sustainable Development Papers 99637, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    4. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D’Haultfœuille, 2023. "Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: a survey," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(3), pages 1-30.
    5. Hung, Ming-Feng & Huang, Tai-Hsin, 2015. "Dynamic demand for residential electricity in Taiwan under seasonality and increasing-block pricing," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 168-177.
    6. Imai, Kosuke & Kim, In Song, 2021. "On the Use of Two-Way Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Panel Data," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 405-415, July.
    7. Halicioglu, Ferda, 2007. "Residential electricity demand dynamics in Turkey," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 199-210, March.
    8. Alberini, Anna & Gans, Will & Velez-Lopez, Daniel, 2011. "Residential consumption of gas and electricity in the U.S.: The role of prices and income," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 870-881, September.
    9. Severin Borenstein, 2012. "The Redistributional Impact of Nonlinear Electricity Pricing," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 56-90, August.
    10. Kim, Jihyo & Lee, Soomin & Jang, Heesun, 2022. "Lessons from residential electricity demand analysis on the time of use pricing experiment in South Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    11. Du, Gang & Lin, Wei & Sun, Chuanwang & Zhang, Dingzhong, 2015. "Residential electricity consumption after the reform of tiered pricing for household electricity in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 276-283.
    12. Wichman, Casey J., 2014. "Perceived price in residential water demand: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PA), pages 308-323.
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Chen, Xing, 2018. "Is the implementation of the Increasing Block Electricity Prices policy really effective?--- Evidence based on the analysis of synthetic control method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 734-750.
    14. Campbell, Alrick, 2018. "Price and income elasticities of electricity demand: Evidence from Jamaica," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 19-32.
    15. He, Xiaoping & Reiner, David, 2016. "Electricity demand and basic needs: Empirical evidence from China's households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 212-221.
    16. Jones, Rory V. & Fuertes, Alba & Lomas, Kevin J., 2015. "The socio-economic, dwelling and appliance related factors affecting electricity consumption in domestic buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 901-917.
    17. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    18. Zhang, Zibin & Cai, Wenxin & Feng, Xiangzhao, 2017. "How do urban households in China respond to increasing block pricing in electricity? Evidence from a fuzzy regression discontinuity approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 161-172.
    19. Huebner, Gesche & Shipworth, David & Hamilton, Ian & Chalabi, Zaid & Oreszczyn, Tadj, 2016. "Understanding electricity consumption: A comparative contribution of building factors, socio-demographics, appliances, behaviours and attitudes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 692-702.
    20. Hong, Sanghyun & Bradshaw, Corey J.A. & Brook, Barry W., 2013. "Evaluating options for sustainable energy mixes in South Korea using scenario analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 237-244.
    21. Jang, Heesun & Moon, Seongman & Kim, Jihyo, 2024. "Effects of time-of-use pricing for residential customers and wholesale market consequences in South Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    22. Li, Lanlan & Yuan, Xiaomeng & Li, Jingjing & Li, Ke, 2024. "Assessing the effect of increasing block tariffs for residential natural gas in Hefei City, China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    23. Liu, Chang & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Is increasing-block electricity pricing effectively carried out in China? A case study in Shanghai and Shenzhen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    24. Jia, Jun-Jun & Guo, Jin & Wei, Chu, 2021. "Elasticities of residential electricity demand in China under increasing-block pricing constraint: New estimation using household survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    25. Cardenas, Helena & Whittington, Dale, 2019. "The consequences of increasing block tariffs on the distribution of residential electricity subsidies in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 783-795.
    26. Kim, Hyun-gyu, 2019. "Estimating demand response in an extreme block pricing environment: Evidence from Korea's electricity pricing system, 2005–2014," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1076-1086.
    27. Hong, Jong Ho & Kim, Jitae & Son, Wonik & Shin, Heeyoung & Kim, Nahyun & Lee, Woong Ki & Kim, Jintae, 2019. "Long-term energy strategy scenarios for South Korea: Transition to a sustainable energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 425-437.
    28. Sungheum Cho & Hana Kim & Sanghoon Lee & Sangil Kim & Eui-Chan Jeon, 2020. "Optimal energy mix for greenhouse gas reduction with renewable energy – The case of the South Korean electricity sector," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(6), pages 1055-1076, September.
    29. Martins, Luís Oscar Silva & Amorim, Inara Rosa & Mendes, Vinícius de Araújo & Silva, Marcelo Santana & Freires, Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça & Teles, Eduardo Oliveira & Torres, Ednildo Andrade, 2021. "Price and income elasticities of residential electricity demand in Brazil and policy implications," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    30. Sanquist, Thomas F. & Orr, Heather & Shui, Bin & Bittner, Alvah C., 2012. "Lifestyle factors in U.S. residential electricity consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 354-364.
    31. Guo, Zhifeng & Zhou, Kaile & Zhang, Chi & Lu, Xinhui & Chen, Wen & Yang, Shanlin, 2018. "Residential electricity consumption behavior: Influencing factors, related theories and intervention strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 399-412.
    32. Nataraj, Shanthi & Hanemann, W. Michael, 2011. "Does marginal price matter? A regression discontinuity approach to estimating water demand," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 198-212, March.
    33. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    34. Feehan, James P., 2018. "The long-run price elasticity of residential demand for electricity: Results from a natural experiment," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 12-17.
    35. Ayertey, Winfred & Sharifi, Ayyoob & Yoshida, Yuichiro, 2024. "The impact of increase in block pricing on electricity demand responsiveness: Evidence from Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    36. Roth, Jonathan & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Bilinski, Alyssa & Poe, John, 2023. "What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2218-2244.
    37. Koichiro Ito, 2014. "Do Consumers Respond to Marginal or Average Price? Evidence from Nonlinear Electricity Pricing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 537-563, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayertey, Winfred & Sharifi, Ayyoob & Yoshida, Yuichiro, 2024. "The impact of increase in block pricing on electricity demand responsiveness: Evidence from Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    2. Li, Chuang & Yang, Xiaofan & Wang, Liping, 2025. "Public energy conservation behavior and the impact of tiered pricing: Based on water, electricity and gas consumption measurements in typical urban households in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Wang, Xiaolei & Wei, Chunxin & Wang, Yanhua, 2022. "Does the current tiered electricity pricing structure still restrain electricity consumption in China's residential sector?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Zheng Fang & Thai‐Ha Le & Jiang Yu & Manyi Fan, 2025. "Evaluating Causal Effects of Increasing Block Pricing Policy on Residential Electricity Consumption in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 1661-1676, April.
    5. Wang, Zhaohua & Sun, Yefei & Wang, Bo, 2020. "Policy cognition is more effective than step tariff in promoting electricity saving behaviour of residents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Lin, Boqiang & Chen, Xing, 2018. "Is the implementation of the Increasing Block Electricity Prices policy really effective?--- Evidence based on the analysis of synthetic control method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 734-750.
    7. Liu, Chang & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Is increasing-block electricity pricing effectively carried out in China? A case study in Shanghai and Shenzhen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Li, Lanlan & Yuan, Xiaomeng & Li, Jingjing & Li, Ke, 2024. "Assessing the effect of increasing block tariffs for residential natural gas in Hefei City, China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Li, Lanlan & Luo, Xuan & Zhou, Kaile & Xu, Tingting, 2018. "Evaluation of increasing block pricing for households' natural gas: A case study of Beijing, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 162-172.
    10. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Yao, 2020. "Analyzing the elasticity and subsidy to reform the residential electricity tariffs in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 189-206.
    11. Luo, Bei & Lyu, Xueying & Song, Ze, 2025. "Efficiency and equity of electricity pricing: Evidence from family-size-based IBP in Shanghai, China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Hung, Ming-Feng & Chie, Bin-Tzong, 2017. "The long-run performance of increasing-block pricing in Taiwan's residential electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 782-793.
    13. Muktarbek kyzy, Akylai & Alfnes, Frode, 2025. "Household energy responses to the introduction of increasing block tariffs on residential electricity in Kyrgyzstan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Gechert, Sebastian & Mey, Bianka & Prante, Franz & Schäfer, Teresa, 2025. "The Price Elasticity of Heating and Cooling Energy Demand," OSF Preprints 4sjy5_v2, Center for Open Science.
    15. Jia, Jun-Jun & Guo, Jin & Wei, Chu, 2021. "Elasticities of residential electricity demand in China under increasing-block pricing constraint: New estimation using household survey data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Lin, Hongyang & Jia, Huanyu & Ye, Yingjin & Shen, Yu & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "Is cognition of residential tiered pricing policy effective in reducing electricity consumption in China?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Lin, Boqiang & Lan, Tianxu, 2023. "Progress of increasing-block electricity pricing policy implementation in China's first-tier cities and the impact of resident policy perception," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Wang, Yao & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Performance of alternative electricity prices on residential welfare in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Khanna, Nina Zheng & Guo, Jin & Zheng, Xinye, 2016. "Effects of demand side management on Chinese household electricity consumption: Empirical findings from Chinese household survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 113-125.
    20. Kuang, Yunming & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Performance of tiered pricing policy for residential natural gas in China: Does the income effect matter?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s095717872500181x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.